OPINION

Too Much Tweeting? Mum Tweeting Son's Death Causes Uproar

December 21, 2009
DesiGirl

By day singing praises of social media and the latest wonder it is capable of and by night, decrying those who use the power of the same to reach out towards some support and solace. The media, the blogosphere, everyone is at it again. Shellie Ross, aka Twitterer Military_Mom, finds herself the latest victim of a modified witch hunt, wherein she is being pilloried for tweeting about her two year old son's fatal pool accident.

Shocked gasps must have resonated across cyberspace when, at 11.08 pm on Monday, Ross tweeted "Remembering my million dollar baby". So of course this makes her fair game as "which mother will calmly sit and type when such a calamity has befallen her?"

What does one do when a loved one passes away? Ring close friends and relatives and pass on the message, who in turn do the same. When my baby cousin passed away suddenly in 2008, my mother and I rang many relatives to pass on the message. In fact, one of the first things we did on receiving the news, apart from falling apart crying, was ring one of my grandma's closest friends, who lives next door, asking her to go and sit with my inconsolable grandma. Not once did we pause to think: "why are we sitting here with a phone in our hand when such a horrible fate has befallen us?" Because that is what you do - in times of grief, and of course joy, we want our loved ones around us, to comfort us and grieve with us. In order to do so, news must be passed.

In the modern world, where social media gains more and more importance by the day, what is so astounding that Ross tweeted the worst news a mother can hear? Didn't that tweet cause her friends to rally around and support her in her darkest hour? What is so shocking that despite losing her son, she could sit and type out 140 characters to spell out the disaster of her life? How different is it from picking up a phone, dialing numbers and verbalising the disaster?

Poor Shellie Ross - not only must she come to terms with the loss of her two-year-old, she must first defend herself against people who cannot believe she used the latest technology to let the world know of what is happening in her life. If you can use Twitter or Facebook to tomtom your latest achievement, post photos of your children and even moan your migraine, what is wrong from using it to gain some much-needed support?

Some people should get a life. And leave the grieving ones to their grief.

Writing is my passion and music is my soulmate. When I have a book in my hand and my music blasting in my ears, I am on top of the world. I would love to be a published author someday. But till then, I shall enthrall you all with my creative genius. :)
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Too Much Tweeting? Mum Tweeting Son's Death Causes Uproar

Article

Author: DesiGirl

 

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Aaman
URL
December 21, 2009
12:25 PM

Well said. It is indeed the individual's emotion at work, and not some sort of exhibitionism at play in this case.

BTW, welcome back!

#2
Desigirl
URL
December 21, 2009
12:45 PM

:D Thanks, Aaman. It is good to be back! Missed the old joint!

And yeah, imagine saying "Thou shalt use twitter for this and FB for that but NOT for the other". pish posh!

#3
J Srinivasan
URL
December 21, 2009
12:55 PM

I couldnt agree more with your views. Twitter et al have replaced the old cell, let alone landline! And I think its become an unusual space to make "real" connections with "virtual" people.

You may want to check the url; it's about the loos of one of my Twitter friends.

JS

#4
Desigirl
URL
December 21, 2009
01:06 PM

@JS

I wouldn't exactly say REPLACED but social media IS there to connect with tons of people in real time so what is wrong in harnessing its power to spread the word? Aren't we doing every min in cyberspace anyway?

#5
smallsquirrel
December 21, 2009
04:39 PM

yes and no. some people abuse social media in the form of exhibitionism that they would not normally engage in. there actually is a difference between picking up a cell phone, which is a private act, and twitter, which is a public act. we can assume that this woman had not restricted her tweets to friends only, as other people had seen it and then reacted...

I cannot condemn her for anything, because I do not know her and I do not know the circumstances. I do not think any of us know if it was exhibitionism or not. But as a mother, I find it odd. If any of my friends has twittered the death of her child in that way, I think I might find it disturbing.

#6
Tanay
URL
December 22, 2009
01:17 AM

if someone is tweeting or posting on facebook, most of the time unless one has defined the boundaries, it is no longer personal, it is public and the online world has full rights to post their views: good, bad or ugly.

in this case DG argues that the telephone has replaced twitter and that's fine if the individual, i.e. ross is OK with it. i am no one to comment on that but still i agree with the comment that smallsquirrel has posted in #5. even i would find it a bit disturbing if someone posts the demise of a close one on twitter. i am fine picking up the phone and talking to the person on the other end.

#7
Desigirl
URL
December 22, 2009
03:34 AM

@SS & Tanay

Yes of course, a phone is a private thing. BUT - this is my view of course - if the lady has a massive support system online, isn't tweeting about it the best way to let them know? I know I depend a lot on my group of mates with whom I send mails / gab on fb with etc. When my son was ill, I messaged them and asked them for tips / prayers etc. So this is just an extension of it, no?

#8
Ledzius
December 22, 2009
05:34 AM

Going by this logic, publishing an obit ad in the newspaper amounts to exhibitionism as well..

#9
smallsquirrel
December 22, 2009
07:59 AM

ledz, be serious... there is not all the emotionally-laden wording in obits, just the facts. not the same thing.

DG... I am not saying it is wrong, and god knows I FBed the living hell out of my husband's recent travel woes. I am just saying, well, some things (to me) are sacred, and I would never do it. Would it be OK for someone else? Yeah, sure it might be. I could only judge on a case by case basis.

#10
Desigirl
URL
December 22, 2009
08:25 AM

@SS

Of course I get where you are coming from and yes, had I seen it in my twitter followers' feeds, I would probably be taken aback too. But at the same time, I cannot judge her harshly for that, you know. She is going through some tough shit and who's to say how to react in such a time.

#11
Deepti Lamba
December 22, 2009
11:32 AM

I reserve judgement on this matter. Maybe this was her cry for help and comfort. RIP for her baby and I hope the grief gets easier to bear.

Add your comment



Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!