OPINION

California is Becoming the Pakistan of the USA

January 25, 2009
Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta

I read on a hedge fund report which said that California is the Pakistan of USA, the idea being that it is becoming seriously economically mismanaged and is in danger of imploding. This comparison with a country is not too far fetched, whatever you say. You hear statement after statement that California, if an independent country, would be the 6th or 8th biggest country in the world in terms of economic metrics. Since then, I have been keeping an eye on that state.

But this state is peculiarly badly governed. Its brand of democracy, the demographics of the state, the high reliance on income taxes, the way the political parties have carved up the state with the constituency units, all combine to make it a fascinatingly amazing place. Because of the fact that the boundaries of the electoral seats are carved out in such a way that they appeal to the extremist wings of the two political parties, the idea of appealing to the centre and doing bi-partisan work is strangely missing. Consequently, the parties are not willing to compromise. Add the "proposition" business and what you end up with is a stream of dollars which are tied ruthlessly to single spending streams. And let us not forget the public sector which is, simultaneously pathetic in terms of efficiency and horribly expensive.

So when faced with a huge economic slowdown, the republicans are refusing to let the governor raise taxes while the democrats are refusing to cut spending. And the credit crunch means that trying to raise money from the markets is nearly impossible because the markets fear the state will not be able to honour its rapidly rising debt. Result? Deadlock. Let me quote some results of this stupid set of circumstances:

California’s state controller said he won’t make $3.7 billion of payments due next month, cutting off income-tax refunds and money for welfare programs amid a record budget shortfall battering the most-populous U.S. state

And from here,

To conserve cash, Schwarzenegger has ordered state offices shut for two days a month and all workers to take two days of unpaid leave each month. The impasse forced a state panel on Dec. 18 to halt funding for $3.8 billion of construction on schools, roads and other public works, a decision officials said might cost tens of thousands of jobs.

And here:

The governor also said he and lawmakers should go without pay for every day they fail to enact a budget past its due date.

(Which might not be such a bad idea).

Schwarzenegger, a multimillionaire, has declined his $212,179 a year salary since he was elected. Lawmakers each make at least $116,208 a year plus $162 per day per diem; legislative leaders make more depending upon their position.

So the bunch of girly men and manly women have effectively driven the state to near fiscal disaster. Some say that people get the leaders they deserve, but surely this isn't the case here? Not sure what is the future of this problem nor the solution, but I can see muchas problemo's in this fiscal train crash of a state.

What do the resident Californians think?

Technorati Tags: ,

Dr. Bhaskar Dasgupta works in the city of London in various capacities in the financial sector. He has worked and travelled widely around the world. The articles in here relate to his current studies and are strictly his opinion and do not reflect the position of his past or current employer(s). If you do want to blame somebody, then blame my sister and editor, she is responsible for everything, the ideas, the writing, the quotes, the drive, the israeli-palestinian crisis, global warming, the ozone layer depletion and the argentinian debt crisis.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Aditi N
January 25, 2009
08:44 PM

"So the bunch of girly men and manly women have effectively driven the state to near fiscal disaster."

What precisely do you mean by girly men and manly women?

#2
BD
URL
January 26, 2009
12:42 AM

Hi Aditi

That was a reference to the governor's considered opinion (See the hyperlink) of the californian legislators followed by a gender equalisation statement made by me, I am sure California has female legislators as well.

Why? What did you think I meant?

#3
kerty
January 26, 2009
03:38 AM

BD

Just because the Governor is a manly man, rolled out from reel life, he can't talk reality in real life about real people, unless he is making movies(about India), than he would have creative license to generalize and offend as he pleases. The reel life terminator has incapacitated the state in real life, but why is he trying to incapacitate men by calling them girlie men, and incapacitate women by calling them manly women? Sure, there are girlie men and manly women in California, but that is no reason to depict reality in such offensive manner(unless it is about India). Sorry, no Oscars to Con, the Vulgarian.

Danny Bloyd is taking applications if foreclosed California would like to settle in Dharavi. There is never a housing crisis in Dharavi, so no bubbles ever get created or get burst there. Out of gratitude towards India, Danny Blyod has his own TV game show dedicated to participants from Dharavi - 'Who wants to be Slumdog Jamal', running twice a week. The Terminator II should seriously think about Danny's rescue plan for California.

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/8696)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!