<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Condoms - For Men Only?</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:42:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by reader</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326207</link>
<description>Amirta,

Well said....hehehee :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326207@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:42:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Amrita</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326193</link>
<description>Ravi - I think testers are being given the big bucks or latex or what have you to bring their own partner. :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326193@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:52:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ravi Kulkarni</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326168</link>
<description>I am just wondering how do they test them, without the second party involvement? Sakshi, your concern may be misplaced after all, they must have invited an equal number of eligible women as well, just a little more discretely.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326168@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:05:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ms. Anona</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326111</link>
<description>Yeh, whisper some applied physics in my ear, baby!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326111@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:20:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by All-night-long</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326073</link>
<description>Durex says..&quot;What one gets in return besides the products is a gift hamper and other incentives. One lucky Condom Tester will bag the employee bonus of an all expenses paid holiday for two at a romantic getaway. Other bonus prizes include iPODs and gift vouchers. Company officials add that all Condom Testers would be provided with a certificate that endorses their participation in the programme and gives them the status of a good lover!&quot;

I agree COMPLETELY with you Sakshi...lets test it TOGETHER...lets be very thorough....we&#039;ll measure the co-efficient of thermal expansion,viscosity,density to penetration ratio,fatigue under multiple orgasms,the inverse of the lubrication value divided by the passion/emotion parameter multiplied by the penis/envy ratio....C&#039;mon Sakshi..don&#039;t hesitate..You&#039;ve stiffened my resolve already;)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326073@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:09:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ms. Anona</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326058</link>
<description>Welcome to the electronic equivalent of Communist China, where the qualifications to become a DC writer are kept secret and confidential.  You are constantly monitored and may be edited or banned at any time.  Maybe you should send in some greenbacks, that&#039;ll do it!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326058@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:35:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vardhan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326051</link>
<description>with due respect, I am commenting on topics with a header line.

The heder line spoke about &quot;Men condoms&quot;. I have spoken about &quot;women condoms&quot;. If this is a debate, please bring two sides to the coin. I am saying with due respect.

I don&#039;t spew. I am telling the truth.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326051@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:46:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326050</link>
<description>You are spewing irrelevant stuff on multiple threads - cease and desist</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326050@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:43:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326049</link>
<description>You are spewing irrelevant stuff on multiple threads - cease and desist</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326049@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:43:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vardhan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326045</link>
<description>I just said that Renuka Chowdhury has introduced condoms for women? why should the IP be banned?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326045@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:33:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vardhan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-326041</link>
<description>[EDITED - IP BANNED]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">326041@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:21:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kerty</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-325901</link>
<description>Lots of men do not like rubber because it makes sex feel so artificial, unnatural to them. Rubbers during Nirodh era came with sizes that could not fit all individuals with their unique sizes and contours - so it turned off lots of men from using condoms. So it makes sense to direct the awareness and education for rubber use to be aimed at men. Women have traditionally borne the consequences of unprotected sex and lack of contraception. So this is positive development that rubber awareness is directed at men and women should welcome it.      </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">325901@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:07:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by perihelionflux</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-325896</link>
<description>would you be equally aghast if some company just scouted for women to try their new IUD or pills or &#039;whatever &#039; contraceptive used by females?since it is men whose precious, golden semen would be pulverized by such devices?

and maybe we should thank gay men for turning the pardigm of &#039;man-inserts-foreign-objects-into- women&#039;s-extremely-private-space&#039; on its head by inserting their foreign objects into men&#039;s not-meant-to-be-inserted-into private space? we have to be thankful for whatever little change we can get into our edict-comandeered societies, even if it comes from gay men..</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">325896@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepti Lamba</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/03/19/083625.php#comment-325820</link>
<description>Have you noticed even in the IPill ad they show married couples always. They don&#039;t want to be lynched, right?;)

They should do research on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/femalebarrier1.html&quot;&gt;Female condoms&lt;/a&gt;- seem to be far more inconvenient than the male condoms</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">325820@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:30:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>