NEWS

Boston Red Sox are 2007 World Series Champions

October 29, 2007
smallsquirrel

For only the eighth time in club history (but thankfully the second time in four years) the Boston Red Sox have clinched the title of World Series Champion. They beat the Colorado Rockies in a series sweep, four games to none. I won't say they were the most exciting games I have ever watched, but they were good enough.

Being a baseball fan overseas is no easy feat. The only channel that carries baseball is ESPN, and my cable operator feels the need to switch the channels around every other day. This necessitates me having to tune the channels in while trying to follow the game online until I can track it down. The other irritating thing is that because the World Series games are always played at night in the US, they come on early morning in India. It just doesn't seem right to be drinking tea and eating flakes while watching a ball game. I should have a beer in one hand and chips or something handy to throw at the screen when someone misses an easy catch or strikes out.

Well, I won't pretend that I don't miss the 2004 team. Now that was a series. The Sox came back from a serious three game deficit to win the series. And I miss Garciaparrra, Pedro Martinez, and even that man whose name I swore I would never speak again after he defected to the Yankees (for those of you in India, it's like your favorite Indian cricketer leaving and playing for Pakistan).

But hey, we did it again. And even though I am not at home, I yelled just as loudly over here in Bangalore. Maybe even a little louder.

Thanks boys, you made a hometown girl proud.

Smallsquirrel is a born ranter. She is an Italian who moved to India by way of the US to be with her husband, a native Bangalorean. She loves bacon and rava masala dosa in equal measure, but certainly not in the same meal.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Boston Red Sox are 2007 World Series Champions

Article

Author: smallsquirrel

 

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
04:24 AM

ss:

since the jays and boston are in ALE...if the jays could not win (there is always next year) i'd rather boston win than the yankees

;)

#2
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
04:35 AM

I would go for an EXPANSION team over the Yanks...

ugh!

but seriously, you're a Jay's fan? wow. that takes resolve, I bet! :)

#3
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
04:46 AM

ss:

and not to mention the redskins

yeah yeah... another perennial no-shows:)

#4
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
04:55 AM

yes, as a former resident of DC I can vouch for that. yikes... and are you a Hawks fan or something just so you've got a trifecta?

#5
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
05:02 AM

nah!

raptors

and though not a fan...in the leafs we have the mother/father of all perennial losers

;)

#6
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
05:07 AM

LOL...

awww... don't mention ice hockey. I miss Caps games. And I really miss when the Bruins used to have a great team. And let's not forget the season that never was....

see, I am such a big sports fan! so tell me, why is it that I can't get with cricket?

#7
Jawahara
URL
October 29, 2007
07:06 AM

I was still living in Boston when the Sox won in 2004. It was incredible. Go Sox!

#8
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
01:49 PM

ss:

will answer your query if you answer mine in the same vein

i cannot get a feel for hockey:(

#9
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
01:52 PM

OK, I will admit something bad... I like hockey only for a few small reasons... the greatest of which is that they have the BEST fights... have you seen a game where they clear the benches? I cannot watch hockey on TV, but in person it's great. the players are always such brawlers! :)

cricket bores me to tears. it seems so slow to me.. there is no rhythm I can hook onto!

#10
bob
October 29, 2007
02:25 PM

"american" football, hockey, basketball, and (yawn) baseball...There is only one truly 'beautiful game'.

temporal-

do you not find the name "redskins" offensive? why not call the next expansion team the "niggers" or "spics" or "chinks"?...only in america

#11
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
02:34 PM

bob, don't use racial slurs on my post dude...

and we were not talking about the names of teams joker... we were nicely talking about sports... so take your politics and your agenda the @*#^@(# outta my thread.

#12
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
02:51 PM

bob:

if you have the time and motivation take this up with NFL

;)

#13
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
02:54 PM

ss:

likewise baseball use to have the same effect;)

then sat down with a friend and watched a few games where he showed me the finer points of the game



#14
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
03:04 PM

yes I can see where baseball might bore someone, but the games are shorter than cricket :))

and now that I know all the minutia of cricket I am still not wild about it. tell me something to make me at least like it, can't you?

#15
bob
October 29, 2007
03:30 PM

smallsquirrel

the racial terms were used in a context to show the hypocrisy of American and Canadian (the CFL's Edmonton Eskimos) society that permits sports teams to use nicknames that denigrate the Aboriginal/ First Nations peoples. Why is it acceptable to use "redskins" or "blackhawks" AND not acceptable to use the names that I mentioned above!? All of which, by the way, (as a real Indian) I find repulsive.
clearly I have offended you by writing these names. but you accept the use of (a highly offensive) word like "redskin"- why?

temporal

the people that find these nicknames offensive have tried to persuade the NFL to force the 'skins to change their name, but to no avail.

#16
smallsquirrel
October 29, 2007
03:38 PM

I don't condone them at all and I do find them offensive. but I just don't want to get into it here. it's a blog about the sox, and partially about other sports. I just did not want it to get political. you assumed both temporal and I supported the names and we don't, we are just talking sports.

not everything has to be political and I felt you came on here looking for a fight when this was just about baseball. if you find baseball boring then why in hell did you read the post to begin with?

#17
temporal
URL
October 29, 2007
03:38 PM

ss:

do you like or play chess? a good bowler bowling to a good batsman is a fluid chess match

focus on a good bowler...does not matter which team

evaluate and discern him the same way you'd an all star pitcher

curve ball, fast ball, sinking ball...

run up, grip, fluidity and grace of the delivery action, where the ball ends on the pitch....full short, yorker, in swinger, out swinger, reverse swinger, chinaman, googly, leg break, off break, yorker

then

there are pitches...slow and dead where the ball does not bounce in the sub continent (with a couple of exceptions)... the bouncy pitches of south africa

then

back to the same bowler...see the poetry in his run-up...see what he does to adjust

adjust to the pitch, the weather, the playing condition...

and

the batsman he is facing

a smart bowler like the recently retired mcgrath is a veritable chess player...he knows the condition of the pitch, the weather and he plays chess with the batsman's mind to get his wicket

i could write in the same vein from a batsman's vantage

:)

#18
ipot
October 29, 2007
09:53 PM

I was in Boston when the RedSox won in 2004. My office was in a building right across fenway at kenmore square. I don't follow baseball at all but it was hard not to celebrate that night, it was crazy!

#19
temporal
URL
October 30, 2007
05:18 PM

ss:

thanks

so you will give this a try?

#20
temporal
URL
October 30, 2007
05:19 PM

ss:

thanks

so you will give this a try?

Add your comment



Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!