Doctors As Killers - God's Representatives on Earth?
Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta
The United Kingdom was attacked recently by a group of terrorists. Ho-Hum, you say, so what’s new? Well, the new angle was that most of the terrorists were doctors. Terrorism is shocking anyway. Then the gruesome and incendiary images of two men in a burning Jeep rammed into the door of Glasgow airport terminal were displayed. And finally the horrifying realisation that these men who wanted to kill so many other human beings by burning them (one of the most painful ways to die) were actually doctors. Why did this cause such a huge adverse reaction?
As usual, several factors came together for this essay. The first was a book which I picked up at Hong Kong Airport by Atul Gawande, Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance. It’s a fascinating book, all about how surgeons see the world: why they are overconfident, how they are determined in fighting off the grim reaper. It describes how the American Armed forces doctors managed to bring the casualty rate in Iraq down to 10% and how polio is near wiped out. It also explains why medical malpractice kills the doctors and criticises the bizarre medical insurance system in USA. And so on and so forth. I strongly recommend this book for anybody who is interested in how doctors perform. The reason this is so interesting is because when you and I make a mistake, all we get is a bollocking, but when doctors make a mistake, it can, at best ruin you or at worst, make you push up daisies. This sort of puts things into perspective, doesn’t it? But still, how doctors refuse to wash their hands and allow MRSA to explode. Why all the patients and public think of doctors as very high skilled people. Yes, they are, but they are just like any other professional person, with some very good doctors, a great mass of middling doctors and then a bunch of frankly bungling idiots. But Gawande talks about how even good doctors make mistakes. All in all, it is a good book.
My own GP was the second cause. He is a tyrant. First he got on my case about my smoking, and when I stopped that, he is now after my weight. I told him that I am special, for everybody else, their bodies are their temples, me – my body is a rotunda. But displaying a regrettable lack of humour and understanding, he has medicated me, scared me, poked me, prodded me and I am shedding pounds faster than Osama Bin Laden is setting up the USA Appreciation Society in Afghanistan. But he is a nice chap and I am grateful for all his attention and advice. The third and main factor was of course the terrorist doctors. The fact that some of them were from India shocked me deeply, but that is going to be explored in another essay.
I had written about two groups of doctors before, one group who operated on my father for his second heart bypass surgery), and how they are treated like Gods. With due reason, their skills and expertise help people to extend and improve their lives and they steal living days away from death. The more complicated the operation is, the more lethal the disease, the more the doctor will fight to save his patient. And the more they fight, when they finally succeed, you see the patient and relatives treating the doctors as if they are divine. And from time immemorial, the oaths that doctors take, the principles that they live by all rely on one shining rule, not to harm anybody. This is what humans believe, and for a doctor to violate this, causes shock and horror.
Now killing for a political or religious reason? That’s worse. Why? We had doctors who were murderers, such as Dr. Harold Shipman here in the UK who was convicted of killing fifteen of his elderly patients and was given fifteen life sentences. The police suspect he was responsible for more than 150 another patients in his thirty-year career. Nobody is clear about his motives still, as there wasn’t much motive involved, although the reason he was caught was his bungled attempt to forge one patient’s will. But that was just one patient, what about all the others? Dr Michael Swango of the USA was sentenced on the crime of murdering three patients and suspected of killing up to sixty more. Both seem to be driven by the power they had over life-and-death. But while these incidents were shocking, they were written off as individuals going off the rails and being bad eggs. Mental problems, drug addiction, etc. was to blame.
We also excuse bungling and inept doctors. If they are not excused, at least we try to understand what happened and fine them, launch malpractice legal cases against them, and the worst they suffer is prison. An example would be the conviction of Dr David Benjamin of NY for causing the death of a patient because of a bungled abortion. Or the seven (two doctors among them) at the Al-Fateh Hospital in Benghazi, Libya who are on trial in Tripoli, charged with murder of 393 children by injecting them with HIV. There are huge numbers of other cases where doctors have been successfully prosecuted and punished in various ways for making mistakes, making wrong judgements, being incompetent or causing harm. Again, while it is surprising, it is not that shocking, as people are reasonably accepting the fact that people can be incompetent and can make mistakes.
But to go back to the original question about doctors who cause death because of ideological or religious reasons? How about the doctors in the USA who help out in the executions of death row prisoners? Whether they pushed the needle in or signed the death certificate, they are still involved in the process. Despite the fact the prisoner might be a mass murderer or a child rapist/murderer, a doctor is supposed to treat them irrespective. So it is not surprising there is a tense relationship between the doctors who help out on the executions and the general medical community. Nobody thinks about these doctors. See the Gawande book, it delves deep into this. But people will not recognise this in the UK, as we don’t have the death penalty. But we do have legal abortion.
Now that’s a fair complicated aspect and it all revolves around when you believe life begins. Legally and, it is only when the foetus has been born (or thereabouts – the exceptions and exclusions around this issue are gobsmacking). But there are people who think that life begins at conception and therefore an abortion is an act of open murder. Dr John Nyamu of Kenya was hauled before a judge charged with murder because of abortion. Abortion doctors in most of the western world, where abortion is allowed, are careful, because they have been attacked in many places, some have been killed, abortion clinics attacked, etc. While people believe in the right to choose, I will bet that if a doctor admits to being an abortion doctor on the dinner table in front of guests, there will be an uncomfortable silence before people will resume eating and talking. So it is understandable and not so shocking.
No? You don’t believe that it is shocking? How about euthanasia? What are your thoughts about mercy killing, living wills and the rest of it? What do you think of Dr. Kevorkian, Dr Michael Irwin, Dr David Moor, Dr Wilfred van Oijen, etc. all who have been accused of hastening death, albeit at the patient’s request? If you were going to go through severe endless pain and know there is no cure, would you ask for your death to be carried out so you can avoid unnecessary pain? And what would you think of the doctor? What will you think of the doctor if you were the patient’s father or mother, who has to impotently witness the pain of your child? Or a pro-life activist? This is also explainable and to a certain extent understandable, if surprising behaviour from doctors. Again, the doctor will do it out conviction that they are helping their patients avoid pain.
But the line seems to be drawn firmly when one inflicts pain because of ideological or religious reasons. After the horrors of the Nazi medical experiments, the World Medical Association was set up to make sure this was not ever going to be repeated. The Tokyo Declaration of 1975 codified the principles on doctors and torture and urges doctors even under threat to use their skills to heal and comfort. But this is a dicey complicated area (see the Amnesty International article on Doctors and Torture here. For more specifics, take a look at the New England Journal of Medicine here. This flat out accuses the US doctors in the armed forces of torture. Or see the famous article in the Lancet by Steven Miles about Abu Gharib’s doctors (Military medicine and human rights, The Lancet, Volume 364, Issue 9448, 20 November 2004-26 November 2004, Page 1852). Or see what I had written about doctors who violate their oaths here.
The storm of vituperation which broke over the USA is, in my opinion, partially because of the shocking news that some doctors were complicit in the torture of the prisoners. This was a step too far. But even so, ignorance of the boundary between torture and medical assistance is rife (many medical schools and army medical schools teach this topic because of this reason), and the criticism is slightly muted (wrongly again in my opinion), because the torture doctors are ours, while the prisoners, well, are prisoners anyway regardless of their origins.
This brings us to the doctors in the United Kingdom and Australia, who would presumably have carried out the attack for a variety of reasons, ranging from protesting against British foreign policy or how the Christian crusaders are rampaging in Iraq and Afghanistan or how Britain supports Israel and oppresses Palestinians. A whole bunch of reasons (some of which I have explored before here).
But then as in now, these doctors have no fig leaf to hide behind. They violated every law, ethic, principle, moral, feeling, emotion and rule about doctors not causing pain and suffering. It is also not like it was a spur of a moment decision in a moment of madness. It was well-planned and very much deliberate, even if badly executed. They actually wanted to kill people by burning them. It was by design. For some medieval, bizarre, barbaric religious and/or political faulty ideology, they were no longer doctors, but plain and simple barbaric murderers. They gave up their humanity and turned into butchers. And that is what put them beyond the pale.
All this to be taken with a grain of piquant salt!
Doctors As Killers - God's Representatives on Earth?
Article
- » Published on July 14, 2007
- » Type: Opinion
- » Filed under: .
- » This is part of a regular feature, With a Grain of Salt.
Author: Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » With a Grain of Salt
- » Comments on this article
- » Politics
- » Desicritics.org articles by Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta
- » All Opinion articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles













Steve Miles
July 14, 2007
05:03 PM
I am curious why you think that the "The storm of vituperation which broke over the USA is, in my opinion, partially because of the shocking news that some doctors were complicit in the torture of the prisoners. This was a step too far."
These doctors designed torture, concealed it, failed to record torture, and returned tortured prisoners to their torturers. (See Miles SH, Torture Medical Complicity and the War on Terror, Random House 2006.) Do you think that this just bad manners or boorish behavior? Seems to me that vituperation rather than a war crimes indictment is great plea bargaining.
Steve Miles
bd
July 14, 2007
05:07 PM
Steve
the idea being that doctors have done wrong, in abu gharib as well, but torture and terrorism is beyond the pale. See?
dan
URL
July 15, 2007
09:44 AM
Hi Bhaskar,
That was a funny piece and yet opened the eyes too. I wanted you to know, however, that Americans Have Friends In India
Three Americans living in Mumbai (Bombay), India for 20+ years formed a company called Americas's Medical Solutions www.americasmedicalsolutions.com . There are no fees as the Indian hospitals pay them to hold your hand from getting the necessary passport or visa to seeing that your every comfort is met while having major surgery. They can even plan an excursion for you, if you're up to it, either before or after the surgery. No medical need is too sophisticated, from in vitro fertilization with long term stays, to in and out dental veneers or implants in one day. LASIK surgery to hip resurfacing is all available by the most experienced doctors and sterile hospitals in the world. They are Joint Commission International Accredited and Harvard Medical International associates, etc., with unbelievably affordable prices for those with or without insurance. These Americans know exactly what Americans need and expect, but as one of their directors said, "Americans can't believe what they get, as our surgeons and technologies are the finest and most experienced in the world. It's a pity the US hasn't had the equipment and technology as long as India has, and the US has simply priced themselves out of the market." They are negotiating health plans with major insurers and employers. Most credit card limits will allow a person to get on a plane and get all his medical needs solved within the time of a vacation.
smallsquirrel
July 15, 2007
11:34 AM
The medical profession will have the same percentage of unethical people as the general population. They will have their foibles, their problems, their addictions, their delusions, their attitude problems, etc. I think certain professions do tend to foster a "god complex" more than others, but others feed into that as much as not.
I do not know why we'd even expect doctors to be any better/worse than the rest of us. Coming from a long line of them, I certainly know better. They are just human and eat and shit and cry just like everyone else.
nice article. thanks for writing it.
bd
July 15, 2007
03:04 PM
Hi dan
thanks for the update! Not very clear about the link, but ok! :)
smallsquirrel. I know the god complex, mate, I have been in two of them myself, lol. But that's where the challenges lie. But thanks for the compliments!
A. S. Mathew
July 15, 2007
08:51 PM
The common people have a tendency to look at
Doctors and religious leaders as "divine entity"
but in reality, that is a total mistake. How many Doctors have chosen medical profession for the sake of serving the humanity in their suffering? Now even 1%. It is a money making
business and some of the Doctors are too ruthless
to butcher people for getting rich too fast. On the other hand, I salute those Doctors who are
working in mission hospitals and remote areas of the third world countries to heal the sick and to give them hope for another day through the
love of God.
bd
July 16, 2007
01:51 AM
Mathew
i think people have become reconciled to the fact that doctors are in this to make money as well. In certain countries, such as India and USA, there is hardly any other alternative as the public health system is atrocious in terms of remuneration or non existent.
But yes, those doctors who join medicine without frontiers and and and are quite praiseworthy. Mind you, even doctors in USA do put aside certain amount of their practise to poor patients!
cheers
bd
more arab propaganda and disinformation
URL
July 16, 2007
04:16 AM
bd - I'm not sure I understand the point of your article.
Are you saying that we should be less shocked that doctors could be suicide bombers because their are so many previous examples of doctors who have taken life?
A. S. Mathew
July 16, 2007
08:08 AM
In response to #7 bd, may I reiterate that I did't throw mud at the medical profession collectively. My father was the first medical doctor in our village before I was born in 1945. I have washed the wounds of many people as a young boy. I respect that profession, I have some relatives working with operation smile and other
non-profit organizations. In the U.S., many
remote areas don't have general practitioners
because a vast majority of Doctors like only city life and fat income. Giving lakhs of Rs as
capitation fees in Indian medical colleges is due to the income potential in the future. I am very
cautious not to use the blog for hurting anybody,
but when I write about the issue in plain coscience, it might have caused offense to some. Please forgive me.
bd
July 16, 2007
06:03 PM
#8, arab....
Most certainly not, my point is that while doctors are humans like us with incompetence, mistakes and issues just like us, but explicitly causing torture and terror is not acceptable at all, because they are causing harm to persons who are simply not connected at all with medical issues. The glasgow passengers had nothing to do with being a patient, an euthanasia patient, a death row prisoner, or what have you. No connection at all. Hence, this was totally against all all rules.
bd
July 16, 2007
06:04 PM
#9, not at all, none taken!, thank you for your comment! :)
cheers
bd
in search of sanity
URL
July 21, 2007
10:04 AM
Any attempt at analysing the psyche of a so called 'Terrorist' is fraught with several prejudices and biases. To be able to judge the intentions of a doctor involved in a terrorist act is even more complicated. I wholeheartedly agree that a doctor is no more and no less moral than any other member of society. I have personally resisted any attempt to wrongly shove me to a pedestal simply for my choice of profession. For the same reason, it is wrong to judge a doctor more harshly because of his/her profession. A lot of the initial outcry following the arrest of the Australian Doctor in connection with the Glasgow bombings stemmed from the fact that he happened to belong to the medical profession. The allegations against him, the vary basis of which seems to be crumbling with every passing day, may be completely false but he'd still carry the stigma of this throughout his life and his career once jeopardised may never take off again bacause this profession more than any other will crucify him.
Add your comment
(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/5769)