Blogging and Bias in Mainstream Media
Sandeep
A Personal Journey
When I was new to blogging, there was much to know and write about. I was serious about what I wrote. I read all I could find. I dug offline for information to support and validate what I wrote. I devoted a few hours each day to learn stuff if that learning was only to defend my position. Blogging has doubtless educated and enriched my life. In a way, it helped me discover what I was most passionate about.
Then something changed.
I no longer read news and articles on the Internet like before. I've been struck by either a severe strain of cynicism or my spirit has withered. Okay, that was my dramatic best.
My incessant hollering about sodomies such as pseudo secularism have begun to sound pointless to me. I even contemplate shutting my blog down.
Version 1.0 of my blog was a disorderly heap of assorted links and disjointed muddles of bombastic text dripping with adjectives. Now read the previous sentence again.
I hadn't the faintest clue about post-1947 Indian politics. My half-baked brain idolized people I now classify under Pseudo Secularism Hall of Shame. Blogging transformed that permanently. It taught me that the coin has two sides. That there's something really deep behind the dreaded Hindu Fundamentalism. That India actually needs to revert to the fundamentals of Hinduism - Hindu Fundamentalism is one of the finest contemporary political oxymorons - to regain its primacy in the world. That the Indian media is lazy, dishonest, and actually curbs free speech. Which is where Varsha Bhosle steps in.
Not a Tribute
My intent isn't to euologize Varsha but to illustrate how even seemingly-balanced media houses play truant. I owe a great deal to her because she challenged my set convictions on several topics and changed the way I thought about things. That gave my blog its current reputation.
I admired her fearlessness bordering on effrontery. I have had serious fun reading especially, her jibes and factual rejoinders to others who challenged her articles.
Rediff didn't take long to dump her. But her combative response is characteristic:
Actually, you've got my so-called ploy all wrong. However, I don't expect guys with your mentality to understand that.You'll be pleased to know that you 'secularists' have a successful and time-tested way of tackling free speech: I am no longer writing for Rediff since its top honcho, Ajit Balakrishnan (also involved with discredited SABRANG communications Communalism Combat), finds me 'very inflammatory.' That's surely something to rejoice over. Yes, please do post my comments on your newsgroup.
Her articles towards the end were increasingly harsh and sometimes, contumely. But they also were painfully factual.
Varsha has vanished since June 2003. To my knowledge, she's not written for other papers - which mainstream paper would touch her? I haven't seen either her messages on forums or her comments on message boards or blogs.
Which validates my original point. Claims of seamless information on the Internet doesn't really apply in the Indian context. The web site of Indian Express or Hindustan Times still publishes the same half-truths and lies. I doubt if it would touch Varsha in its online edition even if she toned her language. To that extent, the fate of opposing voices remains the same. The influence of blogs is almost zero in Indian public discourse. A seemingly-neutral portal like Rediff dumped her but it has thankfully retained Rajeev Srinivasan and Aravind Lavakere. A Subash Kak or Rajiv Malhotra also get space to write there. A staggering majority of Indians don't have Internet access, which effectively bars them from turning the coin to see the other side. The mainstream media retains its stranglehold on information.
The other side of the coin briefly, is that Sanatana Dharma faces a new assault and newer forms of assault everyday. That news is either wholly censored or reported partially or worse, misreported. My post earlier today is a good example of misreporting.
Lastly, the ugly fuss over Reservations is from a wider perspective, one of the most comprehensive onslaughts aimed at the heart of Sanatana Dharma. The most distressing element is it is engineered from within. I'll need a separate post to explain that.
Look out for Varsha's new articles till then. If she's allowed to publish them. And let's thank Rediff for retaining her archives.
Blogging and Bias in Mainstream Media
Article
- » Published on April 28, 2007
- » Type: Opinion
- » Filed under:
- Culture ,
- Politics: India ,
- Media: Television ,
- Media: Newspapers ,
- Media: Journalism ,
- Media: Internet ,
- Media: Citizen Media ,
- Media: Blogs ,
- Media: Blog-a-Thon ,
- Culture: Urban ,
- Culture: The Writing Life ,
- Culture: Society ,
- Culture: Social Issues ,
- Culture: Personal History ,
- Culture: Hobbies ,
- Culture: Essay ,
- Culture: Desi ,
- BizTech: Internet
Author: Sandeep
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » Comments on this article
- » Culture
- » Politics: India
- » Media: Television
- » Media: Newspapers
- » Media: Journalism
- » Media: Internet
- » Media: Citizen Media
- » Media: Blogs
- » Media: Blog-a-Thon
- » Culture: Urban
- » Culture: The Writing Life
- » Culture: Society
- » Culture: Social Issues
- » Culture: Personal History
- » Culture: Hobbies
- » Culture: Essay
- » Culture: Desi
- » BizTech: Internet
- » Desicritics.org articles by Sandeep
- » All Opinion articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles













Chandra
April 28, 2007
01:25 AM
Time for a fox news equivalent in India. May be I will start one. :-)
Atlantean
URL
April 28, 2007
02:39 PM
What you say is true Sandeep. The media has a stranglehold on public discourse in India. What is most unfortunate is that the entire English language media has more or less the same ideological orientation. This makes the media monotonous as we hear almost the same opinions everywhere. The presence of only a few ideological orientations also prevents critical debate. Those who wish to take different opinions are denounced as communal or anti poor (of course without going into the merits of the arguments, and the self declared guardians of secularism dont like to be bothered with facts.) Things have come to this because of two reasons. One is the tendency of the average Indian to lap up everything that is said by the people in suits on tv news channels without critical evaluation. The other is the stranglehold that the self appointed guardians of secularism have on the Indian media. These individuals ensure that dissenting voices like that of Bhosle and Arun Shourie are shunted out (facts are secondary of course, truth can wait, ideology is first, why be bothered with facts?) Fortunately, we have papers like Indian Express which are committed to objective journalism (with gutsy and truth speaking columnists like Tavleen Singh, Balbir Punj, Sudheendra Kulkarni etc.) We need more. Who is going to come up with an Indian avatar of Fox News or Jihad Watch? The time is now.
Chandra
April 28, 2007
03:39 PM
Atlantean
I donot like Shourie (seller of the nation) and Tavleen singh (elite pompous bs).....I would add swapan dasgupta and Chandan mitra to your list. Daily Pioneer is a true blooded nationalist newspaper (if that is a description).
I am also not in agreement about Shekhar Gupta's Express, i would classify it as another centre of left newspaper.
cheers
swabhimaan
December 3, 2008
06:14 AM
Hindus (including Jains and Budhists) who are tired of pseudo-secular governments and media are invited to join Swabhimaan - a movement launched to unite Hindus of India and protect their interests. For more details please visit
http://swabhimaan2008.blogspot.com/2008/11/om-ganseshay-namah-om-shivay-om-durgay.html
STRENGTHEN US WITH YOUR PARTICIPATION
commonsense
December 3, 2008
10:30 AM
Swabhiman:
"Hindus (including Jains and Budhists) who are tired of pseudo-secular governments and media are invited to join Swabhimaan - a movement launched to unite Hindus of India and protect their interests."
?? I thought _The Hindu_ newspaper was doing precisely that? :-) Why divide attention?
commonsense
December 3, 2008
10:35 AM
Chandra:
""Time for a fox news equivalent in India."'
Eeeeeh! I threw up and now my notebook is wrecked. You have the blood of my computer on your hands :-)
kerty
December 3, 2008
12:06 PM
Media chose to portray the images of heroism, sacrifices, solidarity, unity, business-like precision how crisis was resolved. What would have been the coverage like if BJP was in power?
The coverage would have focussed on the following:
1) How police/NSG appratus was late, lazy, inept and how it cost lives - the testimonials about that would have saturated the live coverage
2) Media would have looked for and focussed on stories where people got killed/hurt in fire or by bullets due to negligence or delay by police/NSG/firemen. We would have been shown the gut-wrenching grief of their relatives and the blame game
3) Media would have given us expert speculations on how terrorists could have been caught at various points during the 3day siege but for the lapses from police/NSG
4) How hostages and hotel guests were mistreated by hotel staff, police, security personnel and how government did little to set up first aid, accommodation, counselling, help. We would have eye-witness account of how they goofed it all up
5) How victims and survivors at the Hotel were given preferential treatment while those at VT station were ignored. How foreigners were given preferential treatment over locals.
6) What did burocracies within security apparatus do and did not do - their lapses would have been the main focus of live coverage.
7) Who are the victims, their intimate profile to humanize them rather than being lumped as abstract collateral damage and victim count, how each victim died or got hurt, what could have been done
to save each of that life etc would have been focus of 24/7 live coverage
8) How deficient were the armaments used by police and NSG, who ordered these armaments, various procurement/money scams would have been uncovered to put the key people in the government on the dock
Indian media specializes in creating customized coverage of such events depending on which party is in power - One can see the sharp contrast how it covers events under congress rule vs BJP rule.
Dark Lord
December 4, 2008
08:02 AM
Not sure of the media, but Kerty has his template ready. Anyways, the media has already done the story on faulty equipment, improperly trained personnel and pref treatment to foreigners.
commonsense
December 4, 2008
08:27 AM
DL:
""Not sure of the media, but Kerty has his template ready""
yep, predictable as ever.
kerty
December 4, 2008
10:23 AM
DL
Yes. Indian media is very predictable and its templates are well-defined and so obvious.
kerty
December 4, 2008
11:11 AM
Treason of the learned
Gautam Mukherjee
"key reason for this disgraceful vulnerability is not gross intelligence failure, sluggish response, logistical inadequacy, ill-equipped constabulary or a less than high-tech armed force, but that same debilitating dogma that saps our political will. And in a functioning democracy, political will is of paramount importance. It is political will and firm direction that has kept terrorist strikes in the singular-and-never-again category in the UK and the US. And it is the lack of this self-same political will that is responsible for the frequent gouging of India's soft underbelly"
"
The UPA version of twisted reality demands all Indians to shoulder their responsibility towards this permanently aggrieved minority community, even as it harbours, aids, abets and cheers terrorism in mosque, chaupal and home alike. We should simply mop up the blood of innocents, bury and cremate the dead, mouth platitudes for those martyred in our defence, used up like so much cannon fodder, and then return to normality without demur. And wait for the next round of retribution from 'justifiably angry' jihadis"
Full article
http://www.dailypioneer.com/138560/Treason-of-the-learned.html
Add your comment
(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/5179)