A Suggestion for Ending the Israel/Palestine Conflict
Liam Bailey
The Gaza ceasefire is now an empty shroud, as Israel, patience exhausted has said the IDF will re-start launching "targeted" attacks on Palestinians launching rockets into Israel from the coastal strip, on average twice daily. So, the cycle will begin, attack, brings defensive attack, brings further attacks, brings defensive attacks... repeat infinite.
The always fragile truce, amid what can only be described as an abhorrent failure by both sides to realize the opportunity it presented, was doomed to failure from the start.
Hamas may be unwilling to recognise Israel but its actions during the ceasefire have proven it a willing partner in any peace process. Only unwilling to succumb to anything that will lessen the chances of a Palestinian state eventually achieved, being worth the years of bloodshed. That includes a unity government that allows Abbas free reign to lead the Palestinian people back down the path of his Israeli and American subservience.
Hamas' attempts to do what was expected of them and resist the occupation through diplomacy, were not met with acceptance of the fact that they were clearly making an effort to moderate their ways. But by equal efforts to cripple their democratic intentions, because they refuse to recognise Israel, renounce violence and box themselves into a corner.
Israel has existed for many years regardless of who accepts its right to do so. I fail to see what difference Hamas' recognition would make, like saying, at most twelve words would end Hamas violence, when years of the IDF military supremacy hasn't.
Hamas' infinite resilience in the face of the extreme pressure caused by the Israeli/U.S. forced boycott of Hamas governed Palestine, has led to more creative efforts to end their governance. Abbas' call for new elections was at least partly done for the Palestinian people, realizing that a unity government was not on the horizon he tried to end the Palestinian siege one way or another. It was also undoubtedly done partly to get back into Israel and America's good books and cheque books, at the expense of his relationship with Hamas and therefore at the expense of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and population.
His recent meeting with Olmert was a sign that it had worked. Olmert agreed to the removal of 27 West Bank check-points, slackening the noose around Gaza and the release of 100 million dollars in tax revenues. Revenues usually collected by Israel on behalf of the Palestinians.
Olmert's concessions to Abbas were undoubtedly an attempt to influence any elections that may be held in the PA by helping Abbas to regain some credibility with the Palestinian people. Just three days later Israel announced its authorization for a new West Bank settlement, already being built in the Jordan Valley, to re-house settlers evicted during the Israeli pullout from Gaza. Palestinians must have wretched at Israel behaving like a god over them; Israel giveth --slightly more freedom and money that was rightfully theirs-- and Israel taketh away --yet more land from any future Palestinian state.
If only Israel's leaders could see that granting the Palestinians what they want would also be the ideal solution for Israel.
There is currently worry within Israel that falling immigration may result in the balance being tipped against it remaining a predominantly Jewish state. If Israel gave the Palestinians an independent state within the borders as they stood before the 1967 six day war, and a partial right of return, allowing only descendants of those expelled in the 1948 war the right to return, only to the newly formed state, Israel's Arab population would surely move into the new state. This would put Israel closer than ever to a totally Jewish state if not completing the dream.
Israel's Arabs may not migrate however, as some people, such as Israeli businessman Reuven Kossover, fear that such a Palestinian state would be racked by poverty and at the mercy of foreign aid for its foreseeable future. There is also a simple solution to that problem:
Palestine's warm climate would allow the growth of tropical fruits, which could be sold and exported in a global orchard business; grapes could obviously go to the manufacture of Palestinian wines. As well as craft manufacture industries that could also be exported around the world. We have already seen the pyrotechnical capabilities of the Qassam manufacturers, with a little training Palestinian rockets --and other fireworks-- could bring happiness instead of misery. In my lifetime I have only seen one Palestinian export, Palestinian clove oil.
How many states can you name that have received more news coverage and publicity in recent years than Israel and Palestine?
According to the proverb that no publicity is bad publicity, the novelty of Palestinian exports and the strong support for the Palestinians plight around the world would ensure new businesses expand and provide jobs very quickly. This would not require heavy or sustained financial aid, but an international or Arab program ensuring Palestinians who desire to set up in business get adequate training in the field they choose. Let's hope Israel sees sense soon.
A Suggestion for Ending the Israel/Palestine Conflict
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » Comments on this article
- » Politics
- » Desicritics.org articles by Liam Bailey
- » Liam Bailey's personal weblog
- » All Opinion articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles













Abraham
January 2, 2007
04:12 PM
"defensive attacks"? Is this what you call stoping someone from ACTIVELY shooting at you!!
"actions during the ceasefire have proven it a willing partner" what actions, did HAMAS try to stop the shellings, if they did, we wouldn't be in the bine now would we.
"Palestine's warm climate would allow the growth of tropical fruits"! How we wish. When the JEWS where EXPELLED from Gaza they left their greenhouses that where fully functional. When they left, they where completely looted.
They only hope is for the children to learn that crimes are never acceptable!!
Liam Bailey
URL
January 2, 2007
05:41 PM
Abraham asks: "defensive attacks"? Is this what you call stopping someone from ACTIVELY shooting at you!!"
I was referring to defensive attacks by Israel, so no, I mean "defensive attacks" to stop someone from "ACTIVELY" firing rockets at you.
Abraham asks: "actions during the ceasefire have proven it a willing partner" what actions, did HAMAS try to stop the shellings, if they did, we wouldn't be in the bine now would we."
The shelling, how can you call the firing of Qassams, described by Palestinians as metal forged fireworks, shelling? Shelling leaves a 6-feet wide crater in the ground, Qassams leave a charred spot on the ground. And actually Hamas did try to stop the rockets from being fired read: http://warpages.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/gaza-shock-awe-and-uncertainty-2006/. They also offered Israel a 10-20 year (Honda) ceasefire in return for a temporary Palestinian state established along the 1967 borders, which Israel rejected. FYI, Hamas are not the only resistance faction in the OPT, so even if they exhausted themselves trying to stop the "shelling" as you so ineptly put it, yes "we would still be in the bine now"
Abraham says: "Palestine's warm climate would allow the growth of tropical fruits"! How we wish. When the JEWS where EXPELLED from Gaza they left their greenhouses that where fully functional. When they left, they where completely looted."
What and greenhouses can't be re-built? Thank you for proving my point. If the Israeli settlers enjoyed fertile land, "functional greenhouses" and bumper crops in Gaza then so can the Palestinians setting up new businesses.
And Abraham ends with: "They only hope is for the children to learn that crimes are never acceptable!!"
Do you really think that the Palestinians class fighting the harsh conditions of Israeli occupation as criminal acts? When the International community frequently fails to adequately condemn Israel's disproportionate reactions and excessive punishment of civilians as criminal acts, which they are under the Geneva Convention. If we were relying on you to give us hope we would be hopeless. Any solution to this conflict will be a joint effort, the only way the Palestinians can end it unilaterally is to give up the fight and give up hope, which they will never do.
Add your comment
(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/3990)