OPINION

I Write Romance

March 17, 2006
Amrita Rajan

Once, a couple of years ago, my friends and I were standing in the courtyard of our college, getting lung cancer from second hand smoke, and talking about breaking into the publishing world and how difficult it is these days. We were all writers, hence the conversation and the smoke. And then Brian, who is probably the most talented person I have ever been privileged to attend a workshop with, said, "I've thought of writing a romance novel."

There was a moment of silence as we all tried to get our heads around the idea of Brian, composer of the most lyrically disturbing prose about death and betrayal, writing a fluffy little novel about some girl too cute to say "Boo!" to a goose and the Prince Charming who bravely manages to make it scram and thus wins her heart. And then the sheer genius of it struck us.

There we were, paying through our noses to formally understand what came most instinctively to us and playing around with structure and language - we couldn't just write 200 pages of a love story, we were overqualified for it. And God knew, the romance market might see swings just like any other in the publishing industry but it's one of the most stable markets that exists. Women make up the majority market in most cases anyway but add a little romance and you have yourself a success story.

Brian got the idea from working at a bookstore - he'd see the women march past with a stack of paperbacks, all of them with dark eyed Italian men who sweep English roses off their feet or American cowboys dishing out some down home lovin' to the prissy city girl in her shiny new Macy's boots. I was in a position to reinforce his observation - my brother and I had been wiggling our eyebrows at each other in the library for years as we watched one auntie after college girl stagger out of the Mills and Boon aisle with ten or twenty slim books. I could well remember the day when my own aunt had decided that it was time I began to read some grown up literature - and bought me a copy of my very own Barbara Cartland, which nearly robbed me of my parents as they tried hard not to die laughing.

Digression: for those of you poor mortals who have no idea what I'm talking about - Dame Cartland was an old lady much addicted to Romance. Not only in her work but in her own life too. She stared out at her readers from the back of her 8,000 word "novels", which she churned out by the dozens every year and which eventually turned her into the most published author ever, dressed in frothy pink clutching some unfortunate canine midget dressed in a jewelled collar and lolling around on a daybed in some drafty mansion in cold England. Her books were all about the most improbably named heroines, blonde if they were English, red haired if Scottish and brunettes in rare cases. They would all get into trouble, usually of the financial or sexual kind, be rescued by a titled gentleman, frequently a Prince from some unheard of, tiny, Balkan kingdom and then after marriage were "taken to the Sun and the Moon and the Stars." Insert your own orgasm joke here.

Back in my college courtyard, we kicked the idea back and forth and then laid it aside, too caught up in our 'real' work. But over the last year, I was in an odd position. Drained by my normal work, I still wished to write - if you've ever had an addiction, you'll understand perfectly - but I somehow couldnt get into my existing project. I was still resisting the idea of a blog for reasons unknown and so decided to recharge my batteries with a romance novel.

The first thing I did, as anyone my age would do, is consult my friend Google. It got back to me in a matter of seconds and told me that where there is romance, there is Harlequin. This juggernaut of the romance industry owned the lionshare of the business and with a deep understanding of its market, had set up a website that was shortly to prove very useful to me.

It provided a community for writers, it offered to critique my finished or unfinished work for what it called a reasonable fee, although if I had that kind of money to waste on somebody else's opinion it is doubtful that I would be writing a romance novel in the first place. It offered guidelines and contact information, it had message boards, writing tips, classes in the nitty gritties of novel writing - in short, apart from the excellent teaching staff, the website almost had more resources than my school and it didn't cost tens of thousands of dollars. Thoughtfully, I closed the browser and decided not to mention my discovery to my parents otherwise known as Footers of All Bills.

The two major pieces of advice the webiste gave me was to acquaint myself with the product and write what I loved the most. So I went out to the library and got a few dozen paperbacks while studiously avoiding the eye of the librarian who'd witnessed many a snicker between my brother and I. I went on Amazon and ordered me a few of those .01 cent romances they have in the used section because I sure as hell wasn't going to pay full price for supermarket checkout lane reading.

I then settled down to read what was "out there".

"Out there" was strange world. There were a few basics that I understood immediately such as:

1. The girl is pretty. In the rare event she is not jaw droppingly do-able, then she is sweet, brave, vulnerable, smart and competent. If you're a dimwit and you have PMS then you must be a tramp. God help you if you've ever had an abortion because that's Who it will take to save you from the serial killer/car accident/plague/pestilence/hellfire/etc. that's coming your way. The heroine, however, because she is pure will escape said fate.

2. The man is rich. And he is always a man. Not a boy. Young love and blah blah blah but everyone knows the men is where it's at. It doesn't matter if he's ugly as sin because he's rich and powerful, often physically. He is either manically happy (in case the heroine is depressed about life) or else he's dark and brooding (in case the heroine has a savior complex). Also, millionaires are passe. Let's bring out the billionaires. Oh, yeah!

3. Every man should read one. Women understand women best. It's true. I almost found out more about sex by reading those things than listening to Sue Johansen (the Sex Grandma anybody?) on the Oxygen channel. Please note that I said "almost". That's because the Sex Grandma talks about oral sex and anal probes and other fascinating things. In the world of the genteel romance, the former might be euphemistically and briefly alluded to but the latter is frowned upon. Well, I don't know actually. The word "anal" was entirely absent from all the books I read. I think it comes under Perversions to be Practised Solely by Tramps.

After I'd been at it for a while, enough at all events to determine who were my favorite authors - Penny Jordan, Carole Mortimer and Betty Neels - I settled down and thought of a story. It had to have a girl and a man and they had to end up happily ever after. In between first sighting and the riding into the sunset, they had to resolve a conflict. Those were my parameters. I then mulled over the second valuable piece of advice shelled out by the Harlequin website - love what you write.

I wasn't so sure about that part. I mean, after all those weeks of reading, I could see why so many people love these: they were comforting in a way. This was a world where you knew you were going to have a happy ending, no worries. They let you explore the big emotional highs of hate, anger, jealousy, fear and love for a short period in which you could either translate all of those feelings which occur in your real life to this imaginary world where everything retains the capacity to turn out perfect or you could immerse yourself in this character's feelings and feel them for yourself.

But I wasn't sure whether I could learn to love it, especially when I had to write it. Anyway, I opened up a fresh page of Word and began.

The first thing I learnt was that I was a condescending jerk. Romance novels might be considered fluff but they're hard work. You need to keep on top of dialogue and you need to tell a story cleanly and simply in about 30,000 words and you have to rework plotlines and characters that might seem hackneyed to you but learn to overcome your prejudice and deliver in such a way that it doesn't come across as cheesy to the reader.

Tough job.

It didn't work out in the end - after struggling manfully with everything, the structure defeated me.... I needed more to work with, what with my rambling style and my addiction to million dollar words and frankly, I was a little uncomfortable with the sex scenes. Erotica isn't in my immediate future, I'm sad to say. Repressed Indian chicks will eventually exhibit their repression at some stage. I sniff.

But the dialogue was fascinating. I had always had problems interjecting dialogue into my work and the romance novel is mostly dialogue driven. After an inital awkwardness, I was able to jump the invisible hurdle I had placed between myself and the characters and let them talk to each other. I then worked on a couple of short stories - romantic ones, with possibly very little literary merit but ones that drew on the dialogue.

By the time I went back to my original project, a piece of literary memoir, my style had changed drastically. While traces of my indulgence towards language and style remained, I was no longer wallowing in pages of rambling prose as I groped my way along a plotline. I could not only recognize structure when I saw it, but I could even take a fair stab at sticking to it.

The novel itself remains incomplete, with just one copy in existence today - the first 150 pages, neatly bound and double spaced, autographed and given to my best friend as a gag gift. It is our sincere hope that one day I will be in a position to be blackmailed with it. Amen.

I may not have contributed much to the romance genre, but it sure contributed a lot to me.

Amrita Rajan is a writer based in NYC
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Sujatha
URL
March 17, 2006
12:12 AM

Amrita, a vivid account of a romance writer's struggle! Barbara Cartland, totally took me back! Man, those dialogues, I could never get through them. All those ellipses, especially in the woman's lines, have never figured out how one is supposed to read that. A very good example of how form totally submerged content.

#2
deepti lamba
URL
March 17, 2006
01:04 AM

Most starving writers have turned to porn I mean erotica to fill their starving bellies. Anne Rice wrote Sleeping Beauty and P.J Woodhouse wrote for Mills and Boon before making a break through.

Goergette Heyer was a way better Victorian romance writer than Cartland- her women kicked ass.

Being an erotica writer I find sex to be the most expressive moments that can be mingled with important dialogues that hold the threads of the story together and give a crucial peek into characters thinking at their most vulnerable moments.

Currently Erotica is the 'in' thing especially with women in their early to mid twenties and is the easiest way of making a name for oneself.

Romance needs sex like Oreos needs milk....and erotica is the perfect taste....

#3
Moushumi Chakrabarty
URL
March 17, 2006
07:40 AM

HI Amrita,
I enjoyed reading your struggles with writing romance. Once, not too long ago, I went through the same phase. It was when my writing wasn't being accepted by the publishers mafia (didn't you know it exists?).
At that moment, and for a few self-delusional days, I hammered out a romance, accompanied by much snickering from my daughters.
They knew I wasn't the coy, simpering type (they've had plenty of practice being conditioned in hollering, strict Indian mother). So my MS also languishes in unfinished glory on my computer. Maybe we should form a club?

#4
Amrita
URL
March 17, 2006
09:19 AM

Its intersting that the only ones to comment so far have all been women :)

@ sujatha - hey, thanks! those ellipses were the most interesting part to me as well. I always read them as being a little breathy but they were just so annoying! I hate it when women talk in little gasps anyway [unless they have asthma or something] and to read book after book of that. Yaaaarrrgghhh! And what was with Capital Letters?

@Deepti - you write erotica? Respect. :) where do you publish? Georgette Heyer was awesome. She's prolly the only romance novelist for whom i'd pay full price. I understand she kind of looked down on her romance work which is a shame coz she was brilliant. I've read Sleeping Beauty and it was hilarious. I guess spanking is Anne's thing. But for three whole books?! Another famous erotica writer was Anais Nin. I didnt know about pg wodehouse. do you have any idea about his pseudonym? i'd like to get my hands on them!

@ Moushimi - Lol! Yeah, we're already in a club. The Desperate Writers Club! As for the publishing mafia, yeah i know all about them. curses! oh well, one day... hope you were able to feed the beast and went on to publishing glory!

#5
Aaman
URL
March 17, 2006
09:22 AM

P G wodehouse wrote for Mills & Boon under his own name

#6
Amrita
URL
March 17, 2006
09:29 AM

@ Aaman - great! thanks.. i'll keep an eye out.

#7
Anil Menon
URL
March 17, 2006
09:47 AM

Yeah, Dame Cartland rocks. My sister used to be my book mule, supplying me with a steady stream of Cartlandia. My sister hated the stuff.

I was a writer's workshop a few years back and somebody happened to find a copy of Margret Moore's The Viking. People took turns to read the various purple passages ("throb" and "gasp" are some of Moore's fav words), and the mood of course was that of a pink and giggly slumber party without, I regret to say, the usual consummatory ending.

It's easy to make fun of romance novels but as you pointed out, they're simply written, tightly structured, arousing and rarely disappoint their readers. Updike can't make any of these claims.
The derrière garde is underestimated.

#8
Nandhu
URL
March 17, 2006
10:08 AM

hey,
that's great writing. u shuld publish that novel.

#9
Mr X
March 17, 2006
10:20 AM

On the basis of some of your writing on desicritics, I think I would like to read your novel :).

I have never read a single "romance" novel yet, (although my sis was a big fan of thoe Mills and Boons and they were always lying about the house).

I guess I prefer more "visual" erotica. :)

#10
temporal
URL
March 17, 2006
10:38 AM

am:

Its intersting that the only ones to comment so far have all been women

(say ouch aloud)

now seriously ... nah...may be another time...since you know where to find me;)

(btw the door is locked and chained)

#11
deepti lamba
URL
March 17, 2006
10:43 AM

Amrita, you can flex your creative juices at a number of sites such as asstr.org, literotica.com even playgirl wants writers but they want the work to be submitted the old fashioned way...cover letter, synopsis of the story and hard copy of your article etc

Also there are a number of books available that can give you useful tips on writing erotica ie if you are interested. Being a good writer it will quite easy for you to pepper your stories with some heavy breathing;)

Most erotica readers enjoy a good story line, they are a seasoned lot and its difficult to hold their attention if we recycle the same sex scenes.


#12
Amrita
URL
March 17, 2006
04:16 PM

@ Anil - LMAO at "the derriere garde". I havent read The Viking but I can make an educated guess - too bad she didnt get to the part where she wrote about his "maleness" and "her secret place". I feel your pain.

@ Nandhu - thanks! From your lips to the ear of God. :)

@ Mr X - well maybe i'll post one of my shorts here one day. i've been told they're timepass if nothing more. :) and yeah, men do seem more *cough* "visual".

@ temp - be very careful. especially when opening large, mysterious packages in the mail. humpf.

@ Deepti - thanks...i checked out those sites. wow! :) I'd heard from others that mags like playgirl often are the best places [monetarily at least] to get published but i'm one of those horrible people with no motivation when it comes to mailing things out. as temporal at least will tell you. *blush*

#13
khamkhwa
URL
March 17, 2006
11:27 PM

...just wanted to prove you wrong about only females writing here...vaise i have already told you when where and why of your success...;)

#14
Carl Thorp
URL
November 27, 2006
09:09 AM

The first stage of a £150m investment in regional museums is praised for boosting visitor numbers...

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/932)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!