Bubbles and The Current Financial Crisis
Ravi Kulkarni
"Bubbles! Bubbles!... My bubbles!"
-a cartoon character from Finding Nemo
Is there an end to the current financial bloodbath that is plaguing the world markets? Like a recursive nightmare, you wake up from one nightmare to find yourself in the middle of another. I am still in the middle of my productive career, and I don't find it amusing that my life savings go down 5% everyday. I just can't imagine what it must be for those who are staring retirement in the face or who have already retired. The only light I see at the end of the tunnel is the proverbial headlight of an approaching express train.
Folding banks, closing auto dealerships, collapsing companies, massive layoffs, government defaults; the looming specter is stunning. Many pundits are saying that this will be a mild recession and we should be back on track in a couple of years. In particular let me quote the following:
'Standard & Poor's chief economist David Wyss expects a mild recession that ends next spring. "Gradually we will regain confidence in the market. Lower oil prices and a falling trade deficit will help," he says. "This is a financial panic, not an economic one." '
I don't know what weeds these people are smoking. A lot more bad news awaits us. What we are seeing today is a result of 60 years of unbridled growth and reckless spending. The dominoes are falling and there is no telling when or where they will stop. They blame it on many factors: corporate greed, extreme leverage, wall street excesses, mortgage crisis and so on.
I remember reading this article by S Gurumurthy of RSS. Though the article itself has been ridiculed by the economists and intellectuals in various forums, and there are some factual errors in the numbers quoted, I felt there was an element of truth in it. This article was written in 2002 or thereabouts. Common sense tells me that I can not continue to spend more than I have. A day will come when the bill collectors come calling. This is true for individuals and also true for institutions. But there is a white elephant in the room everyone seems intent on ignoring.
I laughed out loud when President Bush doled out money to people as a stimulus package. The trouble with the economy was not that people were not spending enough; it was that people have spent way too much and they can no longer finance their profligate ways. During the last several years rate of personal savings by Americans has turned negative. The so-called stimulus package only inflated various bubbles a little more. Besides it encouraged people to be even more reckless with their money.
Since the 1940s, America has managed to build a huge economy based on consumer spending. It starts with how money is created (primarily through bank lending, see here). Every time someone borrows money (say to pay for a new car), the system creates a little bubble and new money is injected into the system. This money is supposed to be taken out at a later stage when the loan is paid off, but people keep spending money all the time so the money is never really destroyed except during serious economic contractions. This is not specific to the US economy, most of the modern economies have grown in this way.
This bubble creates other bubbles. Consider this: when there is more economic activity, the governments have more tax revenue and therefore bigger budgets. The current political wisdom tells us that the money should be spent immediately on populist and not-so populist schemes such as the earmarks. After all, one must get elected again in a few years. Once a particular expense head has been created by a government, it seldom goes away. Many economists argue that deficit financing is good for the economy. Wars and natural disasters have contributed by further expanding the budgets. Among certain quarters, there is almost a macabre glee whenever natural disaster such as an earthquake or a hurricane hits.
Without intervention this unstable system will seek some stability through cyclical economic downturns and many of the bubbles will gradually deflate. There have been downturns in the American economy, such as the recession of 80s and 90s, hyper inflation of 70s, stock market crash of 1987 and dotcom crash of 2000. Every time the government intervention has been short sighted with no attention paid to long term consequences of these actions. None of these events convinced the political leaders, financial leaders and individuals that they must spend less than they have or else...
If you remember the dotcom bubble of the 1990s, many people believed that the stock market will never go down. Ditto with housing markets of early 2000s. Similarly for too long, investors all over the world have nursed a belief that dollar is a safe haven and Americans will never default. This has caused them to send money to America in unrealistically large amounts of money through real estate investments, government bonds and lately purchases of assets of large financial institutions. This has significantly contributed to the financial bubble.
To keep this bubble inflated, governments and institutions have to spend more money and foreigners have to keep pouring their savings into American economy. To encourage these events, the lowest pillar that is bearing the weight of all these bubbles, our friend Joe, must keep spending. The trouble is that Joe can't spend any more money because his account is overdrawn. Nobody is willing to lend him either.
The credit crisis is a sign that people have understood the true nature of our economy. Money in my pocket is better than money in yours. Nobody trusts the bogus credit ratings of individuals and institutions anymore. At some level one can blame the banks for lending to one and all, but the blame must be shared by everyone; legislators for not providing enough oversight; bankers for not ensuring the borrowers have capacity to repay; borrowers for being greedy.
Americans have a total debt of about 120% of the GDP. The companies collectively have a debt of 160% of the GDP. Total American debt reached 53 Trillion dollars. That's about $176,000 of debt for each resident of the country. People and institutions have leveraged way beyond their means to pay back. To paraphrase Nouriel Roubini, now "the housing bubble, the mortgage bubble, the equity bubble, the bond bubble, the credit bubble, the commodity bubble, the private equity bubble, the hedge funds bubble are all now bursting at once in the biggest real sector and financial sector deleveraging since the Great Depression".
The casino culture has taken over the American financial markets. Short selling of stocks is the most obvious and glaring example of the gambling that savvy stock market players indulge in. There is also the futures market for commodities. For example the much maligned speculators who have presumably driven up the price of oil and other commodities. In the 1990s new instruments of financial trade called derivatives were created. These are the CDOs, the CDSs and many others from the alphabet soup, which Warren Buffet famously called financial instruments of mass destruction. That bubble is now worth 55 Trillion dollars. To put it in perspective, it is more than the annual gross product of the entire world. This is nothing but suicidal gambling by large financial institutions hedge funds, and wealthy individuals with no added benefit to the society at large. This is another bubble that is waiting to burst and who knows what happens then.
If my hypothesis about the economy is correct, then there are three ways this crisis will resolve itself. Firstly the obvious one, in which there will be a catastrophic crash of markets and institutions all over the world. This will be too chaotic for anyone to predict the sequence of events accurately. The consequences are too horrific even to contemplate, but humanity will survive. It may take a decade or two to recover to some semblance of normalcy.
Second way is that the current patchwork of interventions will work and somehow the world markets will be stabilize. However, I think this only be temporary and we will come back to the same situation sooner or later, perhaps with a bigger bubble, because we not really addressing the underlying causes.
Third way is when our leaders act responsibly, the markets respond in a sane manner and people correct their ways. Government will stop wasteful spending, wall street will stop being greedy and people will start saving more responsibly for their retirement and their children's education. If by some miracle this sequence of events comes to pass, then it will still take a couple of decades for us to come back to stability. The reasons are obvious, the the bubbles are simply too large and they can't be deflated in a short time. However the likelihood of this happening are extremely remote. Consider:
- Law makers are short sighted and often ignorant
- Government likes to keep borrowing to spend even more money and has zero credibility with the main street having spent all of its political capital waging pointless wars
- Washington is full of wested interests, but none protecting Joe's interests
- Wall Street has a short memory and within a few years it will retrace the history
- Regulators have no credibility as they are either corrupt or ideological but almost never right
This problem is not unique to America. I am only using her example because I have lived here for the last 8 years or so and seen what is happening first hand. I am sure similar things are happening in many other countries as well.
The situation is rather bleak, but people change only when there are catastrophic events that overtake them, or a JFKesque leader guides them. Is Obama the JFK of our generation? I sincerely hope so, but I am very skeptical.
What are the lessons for India in this crisis? Unfortunately I don't believe India will escape it unscathed. The only silver lining is that India is not yet that highly leveraged that it will suffer as deeply as the US. However, India is following the path that US took in the '50s and '60s. We can yet avoid it by ensuring that the truly important issues are addressed and never compromised in the name of capitalism. These issues are, savings for retirement, ensuring universal health care and providing good education to all those who want it. Most importantly we should not build our future on bubbles.
Bubbles and The Current Financial Crisis
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » Comments on this article
- » BizTech
- » BizTech: Money
- » BizTech: Economics
- » BizTech: Recession
- » Desicritics.org articles by Ravi Kulkarni
- » All Opinion articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles











Ravi Kulkarni
URL
October 21, 2008
03:42 PM
This paragraph,
"This problem is unique to America. I am only using her example because I have lived here for the last 8 years or so and seen what is happening first hand. I am sure similar things are happening in many other countries as well."
should read,
This problem is not unique to America.
kerty
October 21, 2008
04:20 PM
Ravi
Nice article. Lots of things to ponder. I will add bits of my own later.
kerty
October 21, 2008
04:45 PM
Ravi
Thanks for link to NEO-ECONOMICS: SAVINGS AS SIN, SPENDING AS VIRTUE by S. Gurumurthy. How prophetic it has been proven as it was written way back in 2002.
http://www.mail-archive.com/assam"at"pikespeak.uccs.edu/msg00470.html
(replace @ for "at" in the link)
kerty
October 21, 2008
05:37 PM
Why did Bush tax cuts did not work? Why 600b bailout will produce inflation? Why outsourcing salary boom creates inflation and suffering of aam adami?
Following hypothesis might exlain it.
Whenever additional money is infused in the society, certain indispenisible or monopolistic sectors(energy, health-care, auto) raise their pricing structures, just because economy can now afford to bear such price hike. As a result, the addional infusion of money in the society land right in the lap of such sectors.
That is why every tax rebate saw huge price spikes in oil prices and money of that money ended up with oil cartel.
That is why drugs and health care that sell for an arm and a leg in USA are sold for peanuts in countries that can only bear minimal prices.
That is why salary boom brought about by outsourcing in India has brought about staggering inflation in India - because key industries tailor their pricing to what market can bear. Mumbai provides a good example - most mumbaikars could not afford decent housing when they were making 1k/month and they still can't afford housing when they are making 10k/month and more, because housing costs have risen to match how salaries have risen, nullifying any advantage created by infusion of higher money supply in the hands of Mumbaikars.
Salary is a income for a worker, but a cost for the economy. Higher the salaries, higher the cost of goods produced - as cost of goods go up, people have to pay more for those goods. Higher salaries also create more demand for goods, thus expanding economy, provided economy is allowed to exapand to meet the demand, else it would produce scarcities and inflation - thus lack of pro-development policies, rising salaries, and consumerism are a recipe for inflation and higher cost of living. The problem is that incomes go off for only for few, while cost of living goes up for all, even for people who have not seen their incomes go up. So unions and politicians jump in to demand higher wages, booting cost of production, repeating the cycle, without improving anything in the society. The purchasing power of 100 rupee is same as what 1rs had few decades ago, % of people suffering hardship is same as then, we have more varieties of goods on selves than back than, but % of people who can not afford them as same as back than. So where is the progress? At the most, it has created shraper contrasts between haves and have-nots without the benefit of any shared culture and values that they had than that bound them together.
temporal
URL
October 21, 2008
06:54 PM
rk:
first...welcome to desicritic and look forward to reading more posts from you in future:)
ps: hope now other profuse commenter like kerty, sanjay, kaffir will take note and come forward with their articles
***
just speculating...Firstly the obvious one, in which there will be a catastrophic crash of markets and institutions all over the world. This will be too chaotic for anyone to predict the sequence of events accurately.
in countries where a substantial number survive on less than $2 a day will cope better
ominous thought!
blokesablogin
October 21, 2008
10:00 PM
Thanks Ravi- this must be your promised post on my Home Economics one! Great post! Yes- it comes down to a simple age old rule- spend what ou can afford- live within your budget! I am quite unpopular both at home and amongst friends with such an attitude as I am not "cool"- economically speaking- I speak like Gandhi and he is passe!
Ravi Kulkarni
URL
October 22, 2008
12:59 AM
Kerty, Temp, Blokes,
Thank you all for the kind words.
Ravi
Ravi Kulkarni
URL
October 22, 2008
01:10 AM
Dear Kerty,
I agree with most of what you said. There is no question that a growing economy results in higher salaries which in turn result in higher cost of living. America has been able to contain the inflation because of the highly competitive markets in almost all of the consumer products and cheap source of products from China and other parts of the world. But America has seen periods of high inflation in the past and we may be in for one pretty soon if the dollar does not hold its value.
Everyone seeks to make a better living for oneself. Same with the companies. The question we must ask is: how can the government facilitate this? There has to be growth in developing economies like India, and yet, we should not create large bubbles, which don't have a basis in reality.
I don't believe that stimulus package by returning tax money to people is the way to go. All it does is create another bubble, which will again burst sooner or later. What we need is more fundamental changes in the way money is managed in this country. No doubt both short term and long term solutions are required.
Regards,
Ravi Kulkarni
blokesablogin
October 22, 2008
03:08 AM
Today we were talking about this with other colleagues in the break room- what is better- a pay cut or a job loss?
Add your comment