Nobel Peace Prize 2009: Obama Gets What?
temporal
Gandhi never got it. Obama did.
The Nobel Committee deliberating 2009 Nobel for Peace has just announced the winner: President Barak Hussain Obama. Here is the full citation.
This may well turn out to be the watershed year in the decline of Nobel Prizes.
What were the committee members eating or smoking?
Before this surprise announcement out of left field the three leading contenders were Sen. Piedad Cordoba, 54, of Colombia, Prince Ghazi Muhammad of Jordan and Dr. Sima Sarwar from Afghanistan according to PRIO, the Committee that awards the Peace Prize.
In the past the coveted award has gone to "an individual or organization engaged in the resolution of a protracted armed conflict."
Lately the Nobel Foundation that awards these prizes has come under heavy criticism for being too euro-centric.
President Obama has his future ahead of him. Few can argue that he has made his political mark in US history. He is the first black President, has talked of nuclear disarmament, spoke about reconciliation between Islam and the West, is giving more importance to international institutions and diplomacy. But at the same time he has refrained from asking Israel, India and Pakistan to sign the NPT, has sent in more troops in Afghanistan, and is considering a request from Gen Mcchrystal for additional 40,000 troops and has rewarded financial institutions to the tune of trillions for bringing US to its knees.
Thorbjorn Jagland, the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee said:"We are not awarding the prize for what may happen in the future but for what he has done in the previous year. We would hope this will enhance what he is trying to do."
Yes, he was talked the talk. He spoke of peace in Europe,of reconciliation in Cairo. But he has yet to walk the walk.
Right this minute he is deliberating a request to increase US involvement in the 'graveyard of imperialism' where already nearly 1000 US soldiers have died in the past eight years.
His stimulus plans favouring Goldman Sachs and other financial firms that had led US down the garden path initially has come into criticism. His health package with its public option is being opposed the Republicans as well as some of the backbenchers in his own party.
If the Norwegians are saying to the world that anyone after George W Bush is to be praised and lauded then I am afraid the Peace Nobel has lost its sizzle.
President Obama may well deserve this award in years to come. But not at this time. He has just begun his strive and is yet to leave a mark on world peace
Nobel Peace Prize 2009: Obama Gets What?
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » Comments on this article
- » Media
- » Media: News
- » Politics: US
- » Desicritics.org articles by temporal
- » All News articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles











temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
05:46 AM
we beat NYT by seven minutes
LighterVein
URL
October 9, 2009
06:23 AM
Agreed.
But one thing he did for peace(or was it for human rights:)) in his favour is that he closed Guantanamo 'torture' bay!
Deepti Lamba
October 9, 2009
06:43 AM
Great reporting temporal!
concerned
October 9, 2009
06:48 AM
well that does it the worlds doomed
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
06:49 AM
I was pulling for Greg Mortenson, so I am pissed off. I love Obama, but there are people who've been at this for a lot longer with a lot less resources.
aussie
October 9, 2009
07:02 AM
Spot on mate, my thoughts exactly.
John Doe
October 9, 2009
07:37 AM
The prize is awarded by Norway, not Sweden. Geez... I guess this is the kind of fact checking to expect from someone who partakes in the silly continued effort to always say the president's middle name.
Desh
URL
October 9, 2009
07:37 AM
Sending troops to Afghanistan is not such a bad policy. Its to stop the Taliban takeover and also keep Pak in check. Interestingly, he is the first US President that I know of who has insisted on putting conditions on aid to Pakistan that makes some sense in decades. Otherwise, US administrations have let Pak go scott free to a fault. Read Deception by Adrian Levy and other books on the Nuke proliferation by AQ Khan and Pak to know more on the mess that Reagan et al have created over the years.
I think for just THAT he is different enough! He at least knows the right priorities.
Mohammad
October 9, 2009
07:44 AM
Newsflash-Guantanomo bay is not closed and unless you have actually served there, please refrain from propagated the "torture myth" I know good people who served there that were routinely spit and had feces thrown at them by those that defended the killing of 3,000 americans.
Ledzius
October 9, 2009
08:06 AM
John Doe, don't feel bad. You are not the first, nor would you be the last. Even the editorial staff have done it from time to time. Blame the stupid software that runs the site which causes an inordinate delay after hitting the 'Publish' button.
I wonder why this simple matter has not been taken care of even after several years. Aaman, when will we see this getting fixed?
Amitabh Mitra
URL
October 9, 2009
08:28 AM
Was expecting Morgan Tsvangirai to get it
He lost his wife in the struggle for democracy
Anyway Obama is a great chap
Ruvy
URL
October 9, 2009
08:31 AM
The Nobel "Peace" Prize is already trash, worth less than toilet paper, and more akin to that bucolic substance toilet paper is designed to clean up. The bunch of gutless Norwegian fools who would award a murdering paedophile as Arafat such a prize cannot sink much lower. Once you get to the level of calling a murderer and terrorist a "peacemaker", Obama is only a step up from the offal - albeit not much of a step up.
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
08:37 AM
Ruvy, your comments are disgusting and over the top. Maybe as a settler you should not be so quick to point the "murder/terrorist" finger at much of anyone.
Ruvy
URL
October 9, 2009
08:39 AM
Words are the sole arbiter and the final survivor.
By the way, Temporal, so you know for next time (in case a Desi scores one of the other more valuable prizes awarded).
Alfred Nobel was a Swedish Jew who used his fortune from inventing TNT to promote peace and good works among mankind. When he was alive, Sweden and Norway were ruled by the same monarch. This situation ended in 1905, and one of the issues of the separation of Norway from Sweden was who would award the Nobel Prizes. The parliaments split up the prizes, and some are awarded in Stockhom, and some in Oslo.
Ruvy
URL
October 9, 2009
08:46 AM
smallsquirrel,
BECAUSE I live beyond the kav téfer (look it up - I'll be damned if I translate any Hebrew for the likes of you), I know what a terrorist and a murderer is far better than you ever will. Keep your ignorance to yourself. It's embarrassing to read the tripe you write.
temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
10:18 AM
John Doe:
typo corrected.
thanks for noticing.
you win a prize for two for a weekend cruise with Carnival on the moon
temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
10:41 AM
desh:
afghanistan is a lose lose proposition...and as churchil wrote a 'graveyard' for imperialism...the only reason the US is interested in it is because of what pepe escobar coined as Pipelinistan
please go to this link and scroll down and read the two posts by shaheen sehbai. the conditions were put in by zardari-haqqani nexus fearful of the faujis.
temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
10:42 AM
ruvy:
i understand your dismay at menahem begin the irgun terrorist and murdererzfirooznia@nred.org
URL
October 9, 2009
10:52 AM
i think he deseves it, he is one of the most caring, strongest,most dedicated, most good looking, most wanted, i would do anything to help him, i pray for him and his wounderful gueney every day and night, i am willing to do any kinds of work to help his government, and i know he will make it cause god is with him, since he is hunest and hard working. God bless this man and his nation and his familly.
Ruvy
URL
October 9, 2009
11:04 AM
Re: comments 19-26. Someone better sit down with Phil Winn (the resident Geek for Technorati/Blogcritics, and therefore Desicritics) and figure out something that will not cause the poster to feel he has to hit the publish button 7 times or more....
[IRRELEVANT COMMENT EDITED]
kaaya
October 9, 2009
12:00 PM
Agree with Ruvy and the rest, the site needs technical upgrdations and support that will simplify it's usage.
Temporal, liked the entire write up. Love Obama but don't beleive he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize
bob
October 9, 2009
12:10 PM
RUVY...
didnt those war criminal MFers Rabin and Peres receive this prize with Arafat!?
[EDITED]
Chris R
URL
October 9, 2009
12:29 PM
An interesting turn of events.
He has done a lot to promote world peace, rid the world of nuclear weapons and to combat global warming. I for one, am happy for news. Now if he would only end Bush's wars.
bob
October 9, 2009
12:39 PM
RUVY,
let me rephrase my deleted comments....when will you cease sharing your verbal diarrhea with us holier folk?
commonsense
October 9, 2009
01:02 PM
Ruvy and Desh appear hell-bent on baiting me (even though they don't know it!), but me not biting!
despite the fact that even henry kissinger has a nobel prize, and that too for "peace" which should have put an end to any illusions, the obama prize is quite surprising indeed.
commonsense
October 9, 2009
01:12 PM
Ruvy,
smoke a charminar
Chris Brown
URL
October 9, 2009
01:48 PM
All you guys do is complain and bitch about Obama this and Obama that, what has he done to you that Bush didn't start, Hello wasn't Bush the one that started the war ? Or wasn't he the reason Gas went sky high, also he's the reason we lost our jobs and our houses are in foreclosure since Obama came in office I was able to afford school, and make something out of my self you people that talk all this nonsense about one's accomplishments are simply selfish ignorant morons who have nothing better to do but throw your tea partys and juice up prejudice if he had been a White man you would be happy and cheering but because he is black you are talking shit and spreading nothing but hate if you even dare claim to be a christian I cast your sorry asses to hell. Because of Obama your un-employed asses are able to log online and talk and spread this hate, I mean think about all the drama in florida with everything going on Republicans did this to our Country not Obama and if you believe everything the press says you are a stupid fuck, Wake up people wake the hell up.
And yes I'm proud to be BLACK
temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
02:48 PM
chris:
good insights
you must have run a background check on all the commenters
;)
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
02:52 PM
chris... HAHAHHAH!
commonsense
October 9, 2009
02:55 PM
Chris:
"And yes I'm proud to be BLACK"
huh? why then is your name "Chris Brown"?
Deepti Lamba
October 9, 2009
03:05 PM
CS thats his name!! Dude! you and I both know that you know better!
Deepti Lamba
October 9, 2009
03:11 PM
Chris, breather!! Dunno what your being Black has got to do with Obama winning the Prize. He is the president of the country who has his work cut out for him, let him finish it and then applaud him.
commonsense
October 9, 2009
03:24 PM
deepti, just being my usual silly self!
"It would be wonderful if I could think why he won," said Claire Sprague, 82, a retired English professor as she walked her dog in Manhattan's Greenwich Village. "They wanted to give him an honor I guess, but I can't think what for."
Temple Stark
URL
October 9, 2009
03:28 PM
Seriously? This is stupid and disgusting. If feckless, and wandering around aimlessly with a good speaking voice = peace, peace is nothing.
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
04:20 PM
uh, people... chris brown is the dude who smacked his girlfriend rihanna around. this guy's name is probably not chris brown. it's a nick.
temporal
URL
October 9, 2009
04:34 PM
btw folks
obama did not seek this prize! (yes he could have declined)
any comments on the performance of those (ig)noble committees?
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
05:18 PM
yeah I don't get the animosity TOWARD Obama. He did not ask for this or lobby for it or whatever. I mean, calling it disgusting or whatever, to me is overkill. it's just.. not a good use of an honor that should go to someone who has really tirelessly worked for peace.
Temple Stark
URL
October 9, 2009
06:16 PM
SS,
It is disgusting and note that says nothing about Obama but about the act of giving him an award he doesn't deserve.
Is he the first to be undeserving? No. But that doesn't mean we should agree that anyone deserves the award and the $$$ based on nothing. (PACE, US professional athletes)
To list a lack of accomplishments toward deserving this award is factual.
Has anyone given a real reason why he deserves this award; has anyone fought the mental battle that he's done more than any of the other three toward PEACE.
I've brokered more actual peace between people than Obama in the last 7 months.
Temple Stark
URL
October 9, 2009
06:22 PM
Yeah and I don't know why I"m quite so upset. It's just this dude President Obama has done NOTHING since he's been in office and I'm getting sick of it. That he keeps on getting lauded for doing nothing, well it's the way things should be.
Obligatory PS, I've never voted for a Republican presidential candidate but I also didn't vote for Obama because I thought he was all talk no balls. That's what we've had since inauguration.
smallsquirrel
October 9, 2009
06:40 PM
temple... you and I will have to agree to disagree about him doing "nothing"... but we certainly agree that he is not really deserving. my beef is that someone like Mortenson has risked life and limb time and time again, and has worked tirelessly, even before it was his JOB, to bring education to poverty stricken and war-torn regions. undoubtedly his efforts to give these children an alternative to fundamentalist madrassas will help to ensure peace for years to come.
I think that awarding Obama this award now de-legitimizes him in many ways. I think they should have waited, because i have no doubt that in 3 years' time he will have more than earned it.
Chandra
October 9, 2009
09:35 PM
ladeees and gentleeemen, please welcome the new cartoon character - Kadak Bobama, the Changeman
Here is his theme song
Changeman, Changeman,
Does whatever a changeman can.
Spins a Change, any size,
Catches Change just like flies.
Look out! Here comes the Changeman.
Is he strong? Listen budâ€" He's got radioactive blood.
Can he Change from a thread?
Take a look everywhere.
Hey there! There goes the Changeman .
In the chill of the night, At the scene of the Change, Like a streak of light,
He arrives just in time!
Changeman, Changeman, Friendly neighborhood Changeman.
Wealth and fame, he's ignoredâ€"Action is his reward.
To him, Life is a great big screw-upâ€"Wherever there's a screw-up,You'll find the Changeman!
Maaya
October 10, 2009
01:17 PM
Do agree. Obama symbolizes a lot of positive change that ought to be happening. Whether he is able to bring about the change or not, is immaterial, but he does symbolize the times.
But that does not mean he deserves the Nobel. He has been elected because the electorate is needing and wanting a change ... he still has to show his mettle and it is not going to be easy. Too much expectations.
Weeell, weelll Gandhi might not have won the Nobel, but he did get the 'consolation prize' - the pen !!! The Swiss and the Norwegians are really going for the 'symbols' huh, this time???
Ledzius
October 10, 2009
01:35 PM
This Nobel is going to put pressure on his administration to stop India from conducting more nuclear tests, more than ever.
I think that, no matter what, we should go ahead with them. Let's not worry about the Indo-US nuclear deal. The sooner we do it, the lesser the impact in the form of sanctions.
commonsense
October 10, 2009
02:02 PM
this piece by Garry Wills, professor of history at Northwestern University, in recent issue of the NY Review of Books, was timed perfectly to coincide with the Prize:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23110
excerpt:
"in the early days of Barack Obama's presidency... At his confirmation hearing to be head of the CIA, Leon Panetta said that "extraordinary rendition"â€"the practice of sending prisoners to foreign countriesâ€"was a tool he meant to retain.[1] Obama's nominee for solicitor general, Elena Kagan, told Congress that she agreed with John Yoo's claim that a terrorist captured anywhere should be subject to "battlefield law."[2] On the first opportunity to abort trial proceedings by invoking "state secrets"â€"the policy based on the faulty Reynolds caseâ€"Obama's attorney gen- eral, Eric Holder, did so.[3] Obama refused to release photographs of "enhanced interrogation." The CIA had earlier (illegally) destroyed ninety-two videotapes of such interrogationsâ€"and Obama refused to release documents describing the tapes.[4]
The President said that past official crimes would not be investigatedâ€"certainly not for prosecution, and not even by an impartial "truth commission" just trying to establish a record. He said, on the contrary, that detainees might be tried in "military tribunals." When the British government, trying a terrorist suspect, decided to use some American documents shared with the British government, Obama's attorney general pressured it not to do so. Most important, perhaps, was the new president's desire to end the nation-building in Iraq while substituting a long-term nation-building effort in Afghanistan, run by a government corrupted by drug trafficking and not susceptible to our remolding.
Even in areas outside national security, the Obama administration quickly came to resemble Bush's. Gay military personnel, including those with valuable Arabic-language skills, were being dismissed at the same rate as before. Even more egregiously, the Obama administration continued the defiance of the Constitution's "full faith and credit" clause, which requires states to recognize laws passed by other states, when it defended the Defense of Marriage Act, which lets states refuse to recognize gay marriages legally obtained in another state. Many objected when Dick Cheney would not name energy executives who came to the White House in 2002, though Hillary Clinton, as First Lady, had been forced to reveal which health advisers had visited her. Yet the Obama team, in June 2009, refused to release logs of those who come to the White House."
ct
October 10, 2009
10:45 PM
Why Obama? Why not zardari? He holds the most unenviable post in the world and is trying to do an amazing balancing act.
Ruvy
URL
October 11, 2009
04:53 AM
The Nobel Committee deliberating 2009 Nobel for Peace has just announced the winner: Presiden Barak Hussain Obama. Here is the full citation.
Your really need to do basic spellcheck stufff on your work, in addition to the basic fact checks.... "editor"
commonsense
October 11, 2009
10:07 AM
Ruvy:
"...in addition to the basic fact checks.... "editor":
the DC world hereby humbly acknowledges the amazing fact that Ruvy is indeed not just an editor but a superior editor whose editing nets him "basic fat checks".
I pause
for the
Applause
The Bouquets (spell check?)
You pricks
Hold the
Bricks
Ruvy
October 11, 2009
05:20 PM
Your comments do not matter, CS. They are neither witty nor funny. What matters is that the author (and Desicritics editor) has not bothered to correct his obvious error. But hey, it's no skin off my nose! Purposely leaving mistakes like that to spite disliked commenters only makes the site look bad.
commonsense
October 11, 2009
06:10 PM
Ruvy:
"Your comments do not matter, CS."
Yes, they do! "Fact check" (or "fat check") if my comments did not MATTER, you would find them IMMATERIAL and totally ignore them. But they do, and hopefully they take you away from Palestinian hate and self-hate, even if for a few seconds. And that's my good deed of the day.
It appears you have all the time in the world to split hairs (pulling your non-existing hair out too)over a missing "s" (or was it a "t") in "President". I suppose you are not doing too much of the kind of "fact checks" that in the end produces "fat checks". If you weren't of Ukrainian heritage, pretending to be an Israeli, the term "fat Czech" would have come in handy too, but hey, I don't begrudge you your descent in the manner you begrudge Palestinians.
get the picture mate? now pull your non-existent hair out of your existent head please.
commonsense
October 11, 2009
06:23 PM
Ruvy,
some ukrainians were actually czechs.
so my formula applies to you:
fact check = fat checks = fat czech
bravo for the living up to the time honored tradition of tooting your own horn. don't get too horny though.
commonsense
October 11, 2009
07:23 PM
how many facts would a fat czech check if a fat czech could check facts for a fat check.
temporal
URL
October 13, 2009
12:58 PM
typo fixed
thanks
Add your comment