REVIEW

How To Make A Small Fortune

February 21, 2009
Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta

There is a joke which you will appreciate, especially in these days of plunging asset prices. The joke goes something like this: how do you make a small fortune? You start with a large one. As the newspapers mentioned in a recent item, Russian multi-billionaires are actually just ordinary billionaires because of the sheer drop in stock and other financial markets around the world. But then there was the original billionaire, when there were no other billionaires. I am referring to the Nizam of Hyderabad, the erstwhile richest man in the world, the last living Caliph of Islam, a man, who is currently living in a seedy anonymous seedy two bedroom apartment somewhere in Istanbul, Turkey. This essay is not about him, but is about my frustration and regret and bout the sheer waste of it all.

First, here are the bald facts. Of course, there are no official kings and queens in India any more. The last living Nizam was His Exalted Highness Rustam-i-Dauran, Arustu-i-Zaman, Wal Mamaluk, Asaf Jah VII, Muzaffarul- Mulk-Wal-Mumilak, Nizam-ul- Mulk, Nizam ud Daula Nawab Mir Sir Osman Ali Khan Bahadur, Sipah Saula, Fateh Jung, Nizam of Hyderabad and of Berar, Knight Grand Commander of the Most Exalted Order of the Star of India, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Honourable General in the Army, Faithful Ally of the British Government who died in 1967. He was reputed to be worth roughly $2 billion in the 1940s. Despite him being divested of much of his kingdom and properties by circumstances and the Government of India, he still died a billionaire. I quote from Wikipedia:

Adjusting for inflation, however, he today ranks as the 5th richest person in the history of the world, the wealthiest-ever Asian, the wealthiest-ever Indian and the second-wealthiest monarch in world history, with a fortune that at its high point was $225 billion (in 2008 US dollars).

Asaf Jah’s eldest son got married to Durrushehvar, daughter of Abdul Mejid II, the last Ottoman Caliph. Abdul Mejid left a will stating that his grandson, Mukarram Jah, should be the next Caliph. Can you imagine the ancestry? Three of the most powerful empires all rested and ended on Mukarram’s shoulders. One of the most powerful and richest empires in the world, the Mughal Empire, which gave rise to the Nizam’s empire of Hyderabad, perhaps the richest empire in the world (arguably exceeding the Inca or any other empires in history) and finally the third empire, namely the Ottoman Empire.

And what did Mukarram Jah do? He literally pissed away his inheritance by way of an unholy mixture of incompetence, corruption, five marriages, legal battles and basically being a silly sod. He is still alive today, the man who would never think twice about ordering a charter flight or thousands of Tattinger champagne bottles is now restricted in a tiny seedy apartment in Turkey. Abandoned by all - family, courtiers, jewellery, friends, lawyers, everyone, with nothing is left other than some mouldering palaces and buildings; a pile of rotting and decaying furniture; hundreds of civil and criminal court cases in various courts across the world ranging from London to Delhi to Hyderabad; hundreds of blood sucking relatives and hangers on and so on and so forth.

I have lots of connections to Hyderabad and have been there many times in my childhood. It was fascinating to go around the Salar Jung Museum. I have gone there on Ma’s shopping trips to purchase pearls and now I have recently been there several times, as one of my offices is based in Hyderabad. While I am quite impressed and proud of seeing those lovely collections of jewels, artefacts, buildings and works of art, something burns inside me whenever I see these.

Recently reading a recent book, The Last Nizam, by John Zubrzycki, bought it to the fore. The author has written a biography of Mukarram Jah. And I think Mr. Zubrzycki lets off Jah far too easily. He skates over his faults and does not talk much about the basic tragedy of India, namely to have rulers such as Jah and his ancestors.

India was called as the golden bird of antiquity. Its fields were so verdant and fertile, its people so industrious, the metals/gems/mining so bountiful, that it kept a huge motley crew of royals well fed and watered over hundreds and thousands of years. Not only that, all this wealth called those thieves and buzzards over from all over the world ranging from Central Asia and Persia to the United Kingdom, Netherlands, France etc. to come rob India. And how they robbed India! You go to Lucknow and find that it was considered to be one of the richest nation states in the world. Where and how did these Nawabs spend their money? They send the money to Karbala in Iraq to build canals and hostels ignoring the crying need to build even a single canal in Lucknow. What about tiny Bhopal? The Begums of Bhopal sent millions of rupees to Mecca to make pilgrimage hostels and ignored building up Bhopal. What about the Nizams? They owned hundreds and thousands of jewellery pieces, massive buildings and automobiles but gave nothing to their peasants and citizens.

Nothing for the peasants! They spent their countless generations toiling away for their kings, queens, Nawabs, Maharaja’s, Nizams who were bloodsuckers. They sucked out the life of so many Indian citizens. I know you can accuse me of judging them by today’s standards, but that is not really true. Every religion that they followed, whether Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, Islam, Hinduism, nothing influenced them to rule justly. Maybe one ruler in a thousand would be just and do something for his or her people. And not that these rulers were driven by love for their country either! And this is not a communist/socialist polemic against the rich, if you have earned your dough by virtue of business or inventions, have fun with it. But this wealth was based on coercion and to make things worse, it was used purely for their own individual pleasure, almost nothing went back to the poor peasants.

Think back to the first war of independence. Some war - where most of the rulers rushed to the assistance of the British. See the titles given to the Nizam: Knight Grand Commander of the Most Exalted Order of the Star of India, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Honourable General in the Army, Faithful Ally of the British Government. You don’t get these titles for revolting against the British. Heck, most of the rulers who actually fought against the British were fighting for their own gaddis and rights, the idea of fighting for their people/country was totally foreign to them.

All these countless diamonds, all those huge opulent palaces, those shimmering silks and expensive clothes, those hunting trips, the vast fleets of automobiles Were for what? Can you see the tragedy of lost opportunities? All that wealth, amassed out of the blood and sweat of the common Indian peasants, went to the maintenance of an inefficient and ruinously expensive Australian sheep farm, a huge boat, jewellery, travel, banquets and massively expensive parties.

Can you imagine what Hyderabad could have been like if a fraction of all this wealth had been invested in developing the agriculture, mining, factories in the state? But no, the Nizam stood on the top of a pyramid of blood sucking royals, courtiers and hangers on, who were simply rent seeking. No development, just keep on giving me tax/rent and I will simply spend my time in enjoyment. In a way, the fact that the last Caliph and Nizam ended up in genteel penury, coughing his lungs away, unloved and hated by his friends, relatives and other assorted cockroaches, might seem to be poetic justice.

But what I really regret are the missed opportunities. Just imagine what could have been done by an enlightened ruler with all that wealth and opportunities? And reading the book constantly reiterated that Jah, the last Nizam did not find anything surprising in his behaviour or the fact that nothing was done. It was simply his right and his money to do what he wished. It was not like he was uneducated or did not know what was happening. He has been very well educated in the best Indian and British educational institutions. Presumably he has seen and read about his people. But no, nothing. This is what I find frustrating. So he not only ended up with a tiny fortune, he has also made sure that couple of generations of Hyderabadi’s missed out on a chance to improve themselves. And finally, if he still thinks that it’s a god given right, then I can only quote two quotes, “The Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away” Bible, Job 1:20-21 and “If you want to know what God thinks of money, just look at the people he gave it to” – Dorothy Parker.

All this to be taken with a grain of piquant salt!

Technorati Tags: ,

Dr. Bhaskar Dasgupta works in the city of London in various capacities in the financial sector. He has worked and travelled widely around the world. The articles in here relate to his current studies and are strictly his opinion and do not reflect the position of his past or current employer(s). If you do want to blame somebody, then blame my sister and editor, she is responsible for everything, the ideas, the writing, the quotes, the drive, the israeli-palestinian crisis, global warming, the ozone layer depletion and the argentinian debt crisis.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Ravi Kulkarni
February 21, 2009
09:29 AM

Dear BD,

Thank you for an excellent article. That's why whenever I hear someone talk about India's glory - especially the royal types - I snicker to myself. Glory and riches for whom? All those kings and queens were a huge burden on the commonfolk and I am not at all unhappy that we are a republic today. That a new set of kings and queens have replaced the old ones is an irony I don't miss, but democracy is a work in progress. We should have a huge inheritance tax and use that money to genuinely uplift people in need.

Regards,

Ravi Kulkarni

#2
BD
URL
February 21, 2009
12:48 PM

Hello Ravi,

thank you for the note. I am actually ending up in favour of an inheritance tax. The issue is, of course, the level at which you set it, too punitive and we will create social issue, and too loose and it will lose its meaning, but yes, it does make sense..

#3
kerty
February 21, 2009
01:55 PM

How about the American way, where government and doctors/hospitals take away everything one owns, where everybody, well, almost everybody is broke by the time they reach retirement, and dies a pauper. The adage - Khali Haath aaya, Kahli Haath Chala

#4
Amitabh Mitra
URL
February 21, 2009
04:21 PM

Dear Bhaskar,
Your article has provoked me to write about another royal from Hyderabad. Aminuddin Khan, scion of the royal family, a product of the Doon School and Nizam College, his books 'A Shift in the Wind' and 'A Right Royal Bastard' had given the insight about the Royalty of Hyderabad. He is a visiting professor to Oxford. His son and daughter in law are close family friends. Let me write about him and his family, his books and Hyderabad in a different perspective. I would post it in Desicritics soon.

Amitabh

#5
BD
URL
February 21, 2009
07:30 PM

kerty #3, USA needs universal health care, that's for certain, the current system is "stupid" and I use that word advisedly.

Doc sahib, #4, sounds like a great post to me, look forward to reading it :)

#6
commonsense
February 21, 2009
11:00 PM

Ravi:

"We should have a huge inheritance tax and use that money to genuinely uplift people in need."

hear hear!!

#7
Ravi Kulkarni
February 21, 2009
11:13 PM

Dear CS,

That was a little bit of a rhetoric on my part. There are good examples like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett who have voluntarily given up their ill gotten gains ;)

However, most people would like to perpetuate zamindari and biradari one way or the other. Such examples are everywhere whether it is in Capitalist US of A or communist North Korea. Ayn Rand and her fans would have it go on forever, but I don't believe right to own and especially to transfer property to progeny should be absolute. There has to be an absolute maximum which a person can transfer to his or her children. Birth is such an accidental phenomenon and individual merit has zero bearing on it.

Regards,

Ravi Kulkarni

#8
Amitabh Mitra
URL
February 22, 2009
08:52 AM

The royal household of Hyderabad has many more scions other than the Nizam who have contributed in many ways towards a vibrant culture and democracy in modern India. History has unfortunately forgotten them. The same is true with the royal families of Gwalior and Bhopal.

#9
Kaiser_Soze
February 22, 2009
11:00 AM

I don't know if this story is true or just an urban legend, but the Nizam was slighted by the Rolls Royce folks when he was visiting London. To get back at them, he used dozens of his Rolls for garbage collection in his city. The company relented and begged him to treat his Rolls' better.


#10
Deepa Krishnan
URL
February 22, 2009
12:06 PM

Very interesting article, Dr. D. Enjoyed reading it! If and when I start a tour company in Hyderabad, I will delight in telling my tourists all this masala :)

#11
BD
URL
February 22, 2009
12:51 PM

could well be, Kaiser #9, that sounds like something he will do, but here's a statistic which I found utterly believable. The current Nizam ended up having 80 classic automobiles, none of which were in working order. But he had 170 people looking after them. It was so bad that even the car which took him for his coronation broke down..

Deepa, go for it, and there is much more masala...lol

#12
wendding
April 14, 2010
02:05 AM

Add your comment



Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!