OPINION

Chandrayaan-I: Money Down the Drain or Time to Celebrate?

October 22, 2008
B Shantanu

A few hours ago, ISRO put “Chandrayaan-I”  into transfer orbit around the earth, heralding its “Mission to Moon”.

This is a proud moment for the team at ISRO working tirelessly for the last several months, sometimes right through the night.

It is also be a proud moment for India’s indigenous space research programme and more broadly, India’s indigenous R&D efforts - the seeds of which were planted barely a few decades ago.

But questions are being asked…and doubts are being raised.

“Was this the best use of the country’s limited resources?”, “What will this mission really achieve?”, “Will it have any impact on the problems that we are facing today e.g. poverty, hunger, malnutrition?”

At a fundamental level, such questions assume that this is a zero-sum game and there is a constraint on funds for developmental projects. I do not agree with that…India’s main developmental challenge is inefficient (I would even go to the extreme of saying extremely inefficient) utilisation of resources rather than lack of funds.

Having said that, the answer to these questions is neither simple nor straightforward.

While the launch will cost money (although relatively speaking it will be a small amount: Rs 386 cr./~$80m), the benefits are more difficult to compute. How do you put a value on India’s credibility and prowess in R&D research? How do you put a value on the indirect gains that will accrue (in terms of geo-politics)?

How can you quantify the benefits and the advantages of being at the vanguard of space research and exploration? and how can you emphasize the importance of R&D and activities targeted at the next decade?

Many would remember that the same - and similar - questions were asked of ISRO’s focus on remote sensing satellites in the past two decades… The question - and the “answer” - was eloquently articulated in this article in the New Scientist

But why is India, a country that still has so many development problems on the ground, aiming for the heavens? To Indian scientists, the question is not only patronizing of their scientific aspirations, it betrays an ignorance of the Indian space program’s greater purpose and successes against the odds….

Take, for example, India’s six remote-sensing satellites — the largest such constellation in the world. These monitor the country’s land and coastal waters so that scientists can advise rural communities on the location of aquifers and where to find watercourses, suggest to fishermen when to set sail for the best catch, and warn coastal communities of imminent storms. India’s seven communication satellites, the biggest civilian system in the Asia-Pacific region, now reach some of the remotest corners of the country, providing television coverage to 90% of the population. The system is also being used to extend remote health-care services and education to the rural poor.

In addition…

The “super-cyclone” that hit India’s eastern coast on Oct 29, 1999, could have killed thousands but for an INSAT satellite that tracked its course every half hour identifying areas that needed to be evacuated.

What does ISRO have to say about the benefits of the Mission to Moon? In their own words:

The Study Report of the Task Team was discussed in April 2003 by a peer group of about 100 eminent Indian scientists…After detailed discussions, it was unanimously recommended that India should undertake the Mission to Moon, particularly in view of the renowned international interest on moon with several exciting missions planned for the new millennium.

In addition, such a mission will provide the needed thrust to basic science and engineering research in the country including new challenges to ISRO to go beyond the geostationary orbit.

Further, such a project will also help bringing in young talents to the arena of fundamental research. The Academia, in particular, the university scientists would also find participation in such a project intellectually rewarding.

Needless to say, “If you want to do space exploration, the Moon is where you have to start.”

Asked about the relevance of the Mission to Moon for a “poor nation” like India, G Madhavan Nair had this to say in a recent interview:

How do you handle criticism from a section of the people that a poor nation like India shouldn’t be wasting money on projects like Chandrayaan?

We have faced this question in the early phase of the programme. We are convinced that we are doing more service to the society than the money spent on the programme. But to doubly assure ourselves, we asked a school of economics in Chennai a couple of years back to make an assessment. The report they submitted was really mind-boggling. They found that what we have given back to the society in terms of products and services is something like one and half times more than the cumulative investment made on the entire space programme. Leave alone the infrastructure, the technology, the human resources and the various laboratories we have developed, if we add all that it is certainly more than five times spent on the programme.

Plus there are clear commercial gains.ISRO already has a subsidiary called Antrix (from “Antariksha” = space) which provides services for commercial launch of satellites and payloads into orbit. These services leverage ISRO’s “frugal engineering” to provide a compelling cost advantage in the market for satellite launch services. Last year’s Antrix’s turnover was shy of $240m on which it made a profit of ~ $35m. Chandrayaan itself is carrying 6 payloads for other agencies which would explore the lunar surface over the next two years. 

A successful launch will help further commercialisation of these services and add to our credibility. It will increase our launch and space mission capabilities and help us play a prominent role in international negotiations and strategic discussions on space related matters. It would also help ISRO recruit talented engineers and scientists.

There may also be spin-off benefits in related areas of defence research (e.g in development of ICBM capabilities). Besides the cost of the Mission (of ~$80m) is only a fraction of ISRO’s annual budget, is spread over mutliple years and some of the investment is in facilities that will be re-used for other services and launches (e.g. the Indian Deep Space Network at Byalalu, near Bangalore, established at a cost of $20m - which will also serve future satellites). And all this is done within an annual budget that is less than a tenth of NASA’s (according to this report, in 2006, ISRO’s annual budget was less than 3% of NASA!).

All in all, the Mission to Moon gives great bang-for-the buck.

Yes, it would not directly put food in hungry mouths…yes, it would not directly put any money in the pockets of the impoverished…but the gains that accrue have a huge geo-strategic significance and will help India’s ascendancy on the world stage – not to mention providing a booster shot to indigenous R&D efforts.

We would do well to cheer it.

From the Rig Veda:

“O Moon! We should be able to know you through our intellect. You enlighten us through the right path.” Today, Chandrayaan has set out on this right path.

त्वम सोम पर चिकितॊ मनीषा, त्वम रजिष्ठमनु नॆषि पन्थाम ॥

Tvam Soma para chikito manisha. Tvam rajishtamanu neshi panthaam.  Rig Veda (Hymn 91)

For the more curious amongst you, here is the link to the home page of the Mission, link to FAQs and an informative booklet [~700k pdf file]. There is even a YouTube video on the Mission (I don’t think it is by ISRO though)!

To close, here is an uplifting extract from Newsweek on how India’s vision might just show the way for mankind’s next giant leap:

India’s investment in Earth observation satellites over the years comes to only about $500 million per satellite, about a tenth of the cost of its Western counterparts. After introducing a satellite service to locate potential fish zones and broadcasting the sites over All India Radio, ISRO helped coastal fishermen double the size of their catch. For the government’s Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission, begun in 1986, satellites have improved the success rate of government well-drilling projects by 50 to 80 percent, saving $100 million to $175 million. Meteorological satellites have improved the government’s ability to predict the all-important Indian monsoon, which can influence India’s gross domestic product by 2 to 5 percent.

Next, ISRO plans to roll out satellite-enabled services to hundreds of millions of farmers in India’s remote villages. In partnership with NGOs and government bodies, it has helped to set up about 400 Village Resource Centers so far. Each provides connections to dozens of villages for Internet-based services such as access to commodities pricing information, agricultural advice from crop experts and land records. ISRO’s remote-sensing data will also help village councils develop watersheds and irrigation projects, establish accurate land records and plan new roads connecting their villages with civilization as cheaply and efficiently as possible. One ISRO partner—the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation—has used satellites to conduct 78,000 training programs for more than 300,000 farmers in 550 villages, teaching them about farming practices like drip-and-sprinkle irrigation, health-care awareness programs for diseases like malaria and tuberculosis, and information about how to access government services. Using satellites to guide reclamation of 2 million hectares of saline and alkaline wastelands is expected to generate income of more than $500 million a year.

…and here is a great account of how far we have come in 45 years:

The launch of a US-made Nike-Apache Sounding Rocket from Thumba, near Thiruvananthapuram, on Nov 21, 1963, marked the beginning of India’s space odyssey…

…Recalling the incident, R. Aravamudan, who has been associated with the Indian space programme from the very beginning, says: “There were no buildings yet in the range (Thumba Equatorial Rocket Launching Station -TERLS). Our first office was in the bishop’s house and the St. Mary Magdalene church building there.”

“Once the rocket was launched, there was no telemetry or radar tracking, only photography from three stations of the vapour cloud. The orange vapour trail was visible from all over Kerala and parts of Tamil Nadu. This created great excitement. Since the common public had never seen such a sight before, it also gave rise to some hilarious newspaper reports.”

…”We had to make use of public transport as there were no official vehicles yet and no canteen. So, our day began with a quick breakfast of idli sambar at the Railway Station Canteen, which was the only place where we could get food to our taste.

We would then pack some snacks and lunch from the same canteen and go to the bus stand to catch a mofussil bus to Kazhakkutam. We would get down at the bus stand there and walk about a kilometre or so to the range. The whole trip took about an hour.

“The range (TERLS) was quite large in area and the only means of transport within the range was by bicycle. Those like (A.P.J. Abdul) Kalam, who could not cycle, had to hitch rides with others.”

*Somewhat* Related Post: Of Vimanas and Time Travel 

Recommended Reading: G Madhavan Nair’s interview in Outlook.

Until about three years ago, B Shantanu was like any normal, middle-class Indian - long on debate/discussion and short on action. Something happened two years ago that changed all that for him. He still has to work, eat and sleep like most of us but for the past three years, he has been trying very hard to change a few things. A lot of that effort comes through his writings http://satyameva-jayate.org/ but the pen only goes so far. Someday, he hopes to be able to do a lot more to bring about fundamental and lasting change. To read more of what he writes on, please visit http://satyameva-jayate.org/
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
K. M.
URL
October 22, 2008
03:04 PM

You ask - Is the Chandrayan mission a waste of money? The more important question is "Whose money?" Clearly, the money involved is taxpayer money. And, taxpayers can legitimately disagree about whether the mission is beneficial. In fact as you yourself admit, such questions cannot have clear answers. Therefore, the mission is unjust to those who do not believe it to be beneficial. The government has no business pursuing scientific research.

#2
kaffir
October 22, 2008
03:19 PM

Therefore, the mission is unjust to those who do not believe it to be beneficial.

By your logic, the mission is just to those who believe it to be beneficial. Correct? :)

#3
kerty
October 22, 2008
03:30 PM

KM

Why do people pay taxes? Why not leave all the money with tax payers and let them spend it as they see fit and let the economy evolve out of such economic dynamics?

Unfortunately, many sectors can not rely on private commercial transactions. So tax payers have to pool their resources and create capital markets that can allow large scale projects to be undertaken. Unfortunately, capital markets run on profit motive. Lack of instant profit gratification can not help corpocracy or private sector to tackle fields of r&d and infra-structure that are key for economic development. So tax-payers have to pool money and assign such roles to government - roles that neither individual, private sector is capable of undertaking. Removing poverty is a function of economy - and that role is ideal for private sector - government need not dabble in it when empowerment of private sector can tackle it. R&D and economic infra-structure is a proper role of government and good use of tax money. Let whining leftists whine - I do not think tax payers would trust them with any dime.

#4
B Shantanu
URL
October 22, 2008
03:52 PM

Kerty: Very well argued...Thank you.

#5
Desh
URL
October 22, 2008
04:59 PM

KM - hehehe...

"government has no business pursuing scientific research."

So, why not have the old Daai maas out to do babies.. people using churn pudiyas to cure cancer.. etc??

This is the problem with these leftist jokers.. they will go to any extent to do the duty for the Chinese! Honestly.. the nonsensical nature of your comment is humourous and baffling!!

Next time you walk on the road in your city.... remember I never felt like giving money for that.. and if you talk too loudly.. I might get the Government to tear that road off near your house.. or provide you with electricity! You dont deserve it.

And while we are at this resource allocation question.. and using this sicko leftist logic.. lets shut the electricity OFF in all the hospitals.. because.. our poorest farmers dont get it either. If sick and old die.. then they SHOULD.. because our SEB employees need to be given their monthly begging allowance while they sit idly as $6 BILLION - yes BILLION worth of electricity is stolen THIS YEAR .... and the next.. and .....

NAFED and FCI godowns have to be filled up.. and food MUST rot.. 40% of all food in India rots.... because.. we cannot privatise... and FCI beggars.. oops employees.. need an official begging allowance every month.. and so ...

... we as nice hearted socialists will give our PSU employees their monthly salaries.. so POOR DIE OF HUNGER.. as Electricity gets stolen.. as 40% of our food ROTS!!

I wish we could find better ways to rape and f*** ourselves!! Anyone??

-d.

#6
K. M.
URL
October 22, 2008
05:02 PM

kaffir,
What I meant was, when the government acts in areas that are outside its proper role, it necessarily violates the rights of people. There is no correct answer to the question - Should government fund a specific research project?

kerty,
I don't have time now for a proper reply and I don't want to write just a couple of paragraphs. I am going to be out for the rest of this week. I will reply once I am back.

#7
DCritic
URL
October 22, 2008
05:27 PM

Its a positive achievement and Iam proud that we dared to even attempt it. It should inspire generations of Indians who are proud to be Indians. Its a ray of hope that we could do it against all odds(corruption, anarchy, waning self-respect, etc.)

So what if we try to climb the everest while we could have closed that bank loan with that kind of money, climbing the everest gives u the will to close thousands of such loans and thats why we do it!.

#8
kaffir
October 22, 2008
06:34 PM

Desh, I could be wrong but I think KM is presenting his views from an Objectivist pov, and not Leftist.

#9
commonsense
October 22, 2008
07:24 PM

Kaffir,

I have no idea how KM's comments could be interepreted as coming from "the left". Most leftists are usually blamed for wanting more state intervention in science, technology and everywhere else. But imaginary labels are enough to start some folks on a hyperbolic, frenzied rant.

#10
kaffir
October 22, 2008
09:51 PM

CS, I've also made this mistake in the past of reading a comment quickly, misinterpreting it and being all eager to click the "Submit" button; and I'm sure I'll probably do it again in future. We all make such mistakes on blogs when discussing issues that we feel passionately about. It's no big deal.

Pobody is Nerfect. :)

#11
commonsense
October 22, 2008
10:19 PM

yep, podoby is perfect ;) indeed

#12
Morris
October 22, 2008
10:33 PM

K.M. "Therefore, the mission is unjust to those who do not believe it to be beneficial."

So what? On that basis a lot of other government activities are unjust to some people. I think the real question is; is this a proper activity for a government to engage into? If the answer is yes and I think it is then why not. The fact that India is poorer than the US is not relavent. If Pakistan could do it, we shold wish them well.

#13
Chandra
October 22, 2008
10:59 PM

Leftist or not, KM's point makes little sense. It is increasingly debatable as to what the Govt should be or should not be in. The bottomline clearly is efficiency. Anybody who is able to use resources efficiently is good. Shantanu has done a good job arguing the case of the space program, not so about the moon program. In fact I did not find any arguments in favor of the moon program. The only argument i can find is that ISRO is having a serious problem attracting and retaining scientists and a program like this would help them do that...

#14
kerty
October 22, 2008
11:02 PM

Kaffir #8

KM's position is similar to what a leftist would take in India or a conservative or libertarian would take in America. They all are strict ideological constructionists when it comes to role of government - they all want government to do only certain things and not anything else. What KM does not acknowledge is that majority of America's R&D and space research are carried out by educational and defense establishment funded by government/tax payers. Objectivists view government as a source of all evils, thus they criticize any role government undertakes without their approval. Indian leftists view progress as perpetuation of injustices and reject all progress until basic issues of justice as they define them are resolved - thus any role undertaken by government without their license-permit are plain wrong. So it is easy to confuse an objectivist as a leftist in India when criticizing government spending.

#15
commonsense
October 22, 2008
11:21 PM

kaffir:

""CS, I've also made this mistake in the past of reading a comment quickly, misinterpreting it and being all eager to click the "Submit" button;""

in fact, this is my standard operating procedure!

#16
Ledzius
October 23, 2008
12:11 AM

I don't buy the crap about Helium 3 and how it could solve our energy problems. I can buy other justifications but not this.

#17
kaffir
October 23, 2008
12:48 AM

kerty, thanks. Yes, I know about the Objectivists' stance (ridiculous, IMO) of "taxing is stealing" hence it's immoral, and "state is evil" because it steals from the rich. Maybe they didn't read some valid criticisms of Rand's theories.

I hope KM will write a post or answer some of the questions I'd posed to him in a previous thread.

#18
Ledzius
October 23, 2008
05:53 AM

I am amused when people and press reports call this some kind of an Asian "space race".

Starting after others have already crossed the finish line hardly qualifies as a "race".


#19
Anamika
October 23, 2008
10:36 AM

Btw, this from Andrew McKie writing in the Telegraph:

"And yesterday's launch of India's unmanned mission to the Moon is a wonderful rebuttal of the cynical, unimaginative, irrational wrong-headedness of those who can't see any need for extraterrestrial exploration. No doubt there will be a great deal of tut-tutting that India has launched a rocket while millions of its citizens live in abject poverty. But it is cheering to discover that this sentiment seems not to affect Indians themselves, who have responded to their foray into space with unqualified pride....

But why would any country not be proud of attempting to add to our knowledge of the universe? For any nation, launching a rocket should not be seen as an exercise in pointless one-upmanship, but as perhaps the ultimate expression of optimism, ingenuity, bravery, and rational, long-term planning for the future. The West would do well to recover some of these qualities, which seem now to be attributes of Asian countries.

Because maintaining a space programme is not only not a waste of money, it is the most sensible thing any country can do. Almost every aspect of modern life has been shaped by the technology created for astronauts and satellites. Without the rocket age, mobile telephones, GPS systems, television, the internet and dozens of other things would be entirely different, if they existed at all. Defence systems and most forms of transportion are entirely dependent upon the tin cans orbiting our planet."

Its a not a long article but makes some interesting points...

#20
commonsense
October 23, 2008
10:54 AM

i don't quite understand why this mission was unmanned. i thought the siffers, led by sumanth were supposed to go on a one-way trip to the moon?

#21
K. M.
URL
November 2, 2008
01:14 AM

kerty and kaffir,
Here is the post I promised to write.

#22
At Cheruti
URL
November 5, 2008
11:21 AM

Desh,

As far as I can see, K.M. is asking for the removal of leftist style resource allocation i.e. leaving people free to decide what they value and are willing to pay for. This is really objective and reasonable. He is not asking for the money spent on the moon mission to instead be spent on NREGS or some such sinkhole.

As for roads, electricity etc. there is no reason (apart from official stupidity) why they should not be privatised. This is in fact, what is being done successfully with roads.

Add your comment



Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!