NEWS

Bomb Blasts in Delhi - The Need For Coordination

September 14, 2008
DeeptiA

It seems like we are living in a B-grade movie about some invisible hands deciding to blow up things all over the country, and soon you have explosions happening on a regular basis in various cities over the country; and on the movie theme, the politicians the police are either involved, or are incompetent.

Well, this is not a movie. Terrorists are cocking a snook at the country, and the incompetent Central Government can do nothing but mount platitudes about how 'This is a great tragedy', 'We need a central agency for terror prevention', 'These things will be properly investigated and the culprits brought to trial', and so on. You must have heard all of these standard catchphrases.

Then we move on. There have been so many bomb blasts that happen nowadays that we are temporarily shocked by the carnage that happens, by the inability of the police to catch these people (even when it seems that a large number of people would be involved due to the number of simultaneous blasts), and then we all forget about it. I can remember a time when the transistor bombs in Delhi buses had shaken everybody, and now we routinely get bomb attacks in which more than 10's of people die, and ... we move on.

What do we see the Government doing? Well, I am sure that the intelligence agencies will be doing something, but the fact is that, in a federal structure such as ours, there are a number of different central and state level intelligence agencies (as well as the very weak intelligence network of the police); as a result, unless there is effective coordination, things are not going to work together. And who is responsible for doing this coordination? There are primarily 2 gentleman at different levels for this - one is the National Security Advisor (Mr. Narayanan, who is unable to stem the rot in RAW, and unable to get the Government to reform things so that people find working in the intelligence services rewarding career wise).

The other is the Home Minister, Mr. Shivraj Patil. If India had ever had a home minister who was more low-profile, and unable to make a mark, it is difficult to find one. It is during his time that we have had a massive escalation in the security problems in the country (with more bomb blasts than ever before); the enduring image of him from the time of the Gujarat blasts is of him trying to prevent his clothes from getting dirty during the rain. It was telling on the state of confidence in the central Government that the Gujrat police was the one that seemingly cracked the terrorist blast cases of Surat and Ahmedabad without much support from the center. When he is asked a pointed question about the terrorist cases, even Congressmen would not be surprised if he says stuff such 'we are investigating', 'we cannot blame others', 'current laws are fine to handle terrorist cases', or more mournfully 'we need a central agency, but the states are not cooperating'. Given the rampant misuse of the CBI by the Congress, it is not hard to see why the states do not want to trust a Central Congress Government with a central powerful anti-terrorist agency.

What is the solution? Steps like the Deoband school declaring such bomb blasts as anti-Islamic help, and some more intense investigation with inter-agency cooperation would help to solve these immediate cases; but there is a total lack of long term steps as propounded by many experts:
1. Get beat constables to go around the neighborhoods more often
2. Make intelligence wings of the police more lucrative to join
3. Prevent politicisation of anti-terrorist efforts
4. Make safety more important (for example, today I had gone to the Lajpat Nagar market in Delhi - a fairly crowded place. In the central market, there is cordoning off and entry is only through a walk-in bomb detector gate, but the effect was gone. The gate was not working, and there were no policemen nearby. In India's crowded and culturally mixed population, it is hard to detect potential terrorists, but at least things should not be made easy for them)

Hi, I write about the entertainment market in India, concentrating on the Hindi language programmes on TV, and on the Indian movie market, Bollywood. I am also interested in research on Cancer (because of a friend), and try to keep on reading more on this.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Bomb Blasts in Delhi - The Need For Coordination

Article

Author: DeeptiA

 

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Sanjay
September 14, 2008
11:01 PM

Britain Quietly Caves In, and Allows Sharia Courts in the UK:

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008/09/15/story_15-9-2008_pg7_8

LAHORE: Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain, with shariah courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases, The Sunday Times reported.

According to the paper, the British government has 'quietly sanctioned' shariah judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five shariah courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, the paper reported.

The report said that shariah courts have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Sheikh Faizul Aqtab Siddiqui, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, was quoted by the paper as saying he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996.

Under the act, the shariah courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, if both parties agree to give them authority to rule on their case.

Siddiqui said to the paper, "We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts...allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals."

Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a 'parallel legal system'.

Dominic Grieve, the Shadow Home Secretary, said, "If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so."

#2
kerty
September 15, 2008
12:19 AM

One can not fight terrorism by creating a security checks regime - country has too many nooks and corners and no amount of police or security measures would be enough to guard them 24/7.

The only way to fight terrorism is to raise the price of engaging in terrorism too high that no terrorist would not be willing to pay.

- Terrorist must fear not only their own lives, but their immediate families and communities they love.

- Not only people who pull the trigger, but people who provide logistic, financial, moral and political support also must face stiff consequences.

- The causes and agenda that seeks to benefit from Terrorism must be given sever blow with each act of terrorism. When terrorists see their cause and agenda suffer huge setbacks with each terrorist act, they would think twice. That is the only real deterrent.

- One can not treat terrorism as law and order problem and fight it within civilian legal framework - you have to deny certain constitutional protections and civilian freedoms to terrorist network. Its religious and political agenda have to be de-legitimized and made 'untouchbale' in political arena - rather than court them as votebanks.

It means, India needs special laws to deal with terrorism. Sure, there will be instances of abuses of such laws, but are there no casualties in wars, are there no innocent who die in wars? As long as there is an imperatives of fighting terrorism on war footing, one can't fight it with hands tied - one would need most draconian weapons that shock and owe the enemies, that put fear in their minds and paralyze their next moves - kind of war-game that only terrorists seems to be playing in India at will and win it hands down because Congress that is ideologically dependent on Islamic votebanks would not let India fight it back.

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/8222)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!