<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Indian Movies - Very Much Without Verisimilitude</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:11:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by gesundheit</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-359847</link>
<description>Sehr wertvolle Informationen! Empfehlen!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">359847@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:11:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gesundheit</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-359846</link>
<description>Sehr wertvolle Informationen! Empfehlen!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">359846@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fussball</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-356062</link>
<description>Gute Arbeit hier! Gute Inhalte.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">356062@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:23:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fussball</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-356061</link>
<description>Gute Arbeit hier! Gute Inhalte.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">356061@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:22:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by berlin</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-354947</link>
<description>Gut!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">354947@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:00:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by berlin</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-354946</link>
<description>Gut!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">354946@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:59:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cine Cynic</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338825</link>
<description>Thanks a bunch for stopping by.

Temporal, special thanks for an article idea. I&#039;ve noted that down in my diary. One day...

Syriana, Blood Diamond, Bond series, Leaving Las Vegas are all movies rich in verisimilitude, Anamika. Even the Bond series in its own way. Mike Figgis&#039;s Leaving Las Vegas is however far from a blockbuster, and a wonderful movie. When you see these, you think, &quot;This is the way such and such character would speak or act, owing to their own background or the setting they are in.&quot;

You&#039;ve a point there, smallsquirrel. But I still haven&#039;t the faintest idea of what could&#039;ve been a better word choice.

I haven&#039;t watched OSO, but thanks to your comment, CS, I get the joke now.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338825@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:08:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by commonsense</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338472</link>
<description>yep, the author was trying to type vermilion (a staple of indian movies) but ended up with vermisilitude...which is very strange, because a lot of indian movies are very much about vermilion</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338472@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:57:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by smallsquirrel</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338462</link>
<description>anamika... oooooooooo, I finally get it! LOL. and I just watched that movie like a week ago.

(one year olds fry the brain cells)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338462@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:48:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by anand</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338460</link>
<description>i disagree indian movies are already ridiculously long </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338460@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:34:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anamika</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338453</link>
<description>#6 and 7: Think that reference is from that wholly verisimilitude driven film Om Shanti Om, as in &quot;ek chutki sindoor....&quot;  The issues with versimilitude of vermilion are of course obvious. Lol....

Funnily enough thats the only Hindi a Scottish friend of mine knows...makes her hugely popular with the back office in Hyderabad who all kill themselves laughing....
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338453@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:31:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338436</link>
<description>stand corrected

meant ss:)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338436@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:03:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by smallsquirrel</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338435</link>
<description>common, I think I am lost... vermilion????</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338435@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:48:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by commonsense</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338434</link>
<description>SS,

I think a simple spell-check would have pointed out the correct spelling for &quot;vermilion&quot;&quot; (sp?) or sendhur</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338434@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:39:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by commonsense</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338433</link>
<description>Oops, Temp, perhaps you meant SS not CS? I haven&#039;t yet infected this thread with pointless drivel :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338433@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:37:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338421</link>
<description>tch! tch!  ana and cs

why can&#039;t you mince words?

***

achcha, thoughts on love in indian movies....no make it Love....as a western construct shoved down our cyber turbans

(ss remember you are an honourary desi...&quot;rise me-lady!&quot;)

khair

last night by the lake my friend A said we desis have lived for centuries, married, consorted, cared, procreated without Love and now suddenly in the space of 5/6 decades we are singing in the rain (while circling the tree or paddling in the river)...he insisted it is SO  un-desi ..this overt display of Love...all this tactility in public 

a chastised t immediately removed his hands from around m before protesting...citing sassi-pannu, heer ranjha...actually he cited lalila majunun and shireen farhad first but a shot it down as persian-arabic...

m, attentive, uttered one word - &quot;un-consumed&quot;

a picked up on it and agreed vociferously: those were not everyday examples...yore...and lore...and yes...unattained and unconsumed....dastaans and folk tales

...khair....phone rings...continue with your thoughts...shall return if needed

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338421@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:54:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by smallsquirrel</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338418</link>
<description>I don&#039;t mean to be a shit, but I think the use of a ten dollar word in the title where a number of 50 cent words would have worked will put a number of people off this article.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338418@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:19:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anamika</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338406</link>
<description>Temp bhai, be nice! you cant welcome someone to dc with that! ;-)

CC: can i ask you why is &quot;verisimilitude&quot; so necessary for films? and can you tell me about that same &quot;verisimilitude&quot; in films like Syriana, Blood Diamonds, Bond series, Leaving Las Vegas, and hollywood&#039;s &quot;blockbusters&quot; ad nauseum? 

Enquiring minds want to know....
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338406@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:23:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/08/03/115203.php#comment-338403</link>
<description>welcome to desi:)

look forward to when you tackle the imposition of the western construct of &quot;love&quot; in indian movies</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">338403@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:14:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>