<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Love And All That Jazz</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:17:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jess</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-382344</link>
<description>A must read on this topic. 

Book: First Comes Marriage: Modern Relationship Advice from the Wisdom of Arranged Marriages by Reva Seth (Paperback - June 3, 2008)

I picked it up in a Delhi bookstore. The author is an Indian origin Canadian. Also it is available on Amazon. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">382344@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-369950</link>
<description>Deepa:
 I really liked reading your article. But just a few observations-

1) You seem to be confusing internet matri sites with arranged marriages. They are not the same, at all. True, some parents do use the internet matrimonial sites for find matches for their children but unlike in a traditional arranged marriage scene the real strings are in your hands.
In fact sites are shaadi.com or jeevansaathi.com are no different from the online datings sites quite prevalent in the western world. We seem to be living in a maddeningly busy world, thus people resort to the internet to find their soulmates..
 How online matri sites work on the compatibility factor. Very unlike a typical arranged marriage concept, where the looks, money and horoscope play a vital role. On the other hand in most of the online matri matches, its the individual herself who takes charge of the situation ,not her parents. 

I agree with many of your observations on arranged matches but then would also point out that internet match work differently.

2) Isn&#039;t love also a constructed notion? Can we pen down a list of what it means to be in love without sounding hackneyed! It works differently for different people. Some find happiness and love even in arranged marriages and some could be unhappy in lovematch!
To me what really matters, if whether the individuals are compatible- emotionally and physically. True love is something deeper, something organic, that grows with time. And yes it is also true if it has been tried and tested. If the couple still remains together even after amble fights and tough situations , then there is something to that relationship. 
Not all of us love the same way. Some are turned on by looks and some by feelings and thoughts. Some fall in love madly and some slowly step into love.

But yes love in a marriage shouldnt be confused with comfort. Many indian marriages have that comfort factor in it without real love be it a love match or an arranged. We indians seem to live more for the society and other people and lose track of what we really want...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">369950@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:20:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mahi</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-365685</link>
<description>Yes, I agree with you Deepa that tag line has an inherent contradiction somewhere. Maybe it should have been marraige a relationship that ties you down. The &quot;for ever&quot; part also seems a bit old fashioned to me specially in the urban context. But then life doesn&#039;t come with any guarentees and its true for marraiges. A modern woman cannot be sure that she will find comfort, security, and intimacy in a marraige - arranged or love. She has to work hard on it. So, will the couple be rewarded of all the hard work with love, or just a smug satisfaction of settelling down with a goodlooking and rich partner (some people live their lives with what others think of them), or being blessed with an intelligent, obiedient and a beautiful child, or just with a feeling of being stuck with something dsyfunctional - only time will tell. I suppose  every couple will have a story to tell - what happened when no one was looking. Do stars  really collide for some arraged marraiges? Inshaallaha, otherwise it&#039;s a grim world.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">365685@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 May 2009 12:20:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MV</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-365375</link>
<description>Deepa,

There are always pros and cons in any relationship, let alone &quot;marriage&quot;... Arranged or love marriages are purely out of choice by an individual.. and By and large today&#039;s youth value and rever Indian arranged marriages ( I am including my own example here.. who is happily &quot;arranged-married&quot; for the last few months) as compared to any of the apes to the western culture... Because, arranged marriage comes in with lots of intimate bonds and I guess everyone agrees that &quot;bonds&quot; do not restrict to husband alone but also to the entire family... 

Marriage is basically a union of two souls.. and let us not restrict it to the bed room alone.. let us expand our thinking horizons and try and look beyond it just to experience the purity that comes along with it... If not, let us try and understand the meaning of 7 steps taken during the wedding as a ritual..

Marriage brings along with it commitment,devotion,unconditonal love,togetherness,companionship while we are trying the progeny.. (I do not see any harm in this as procreation is one of the basic needs of any human being...!).. 

Why do we still envy the &quot;love&quot; between our grandparents who are married for atleast more than 50+ years in contrast to the off and on relationships that we see in between our friends??? Is there a compromise?? 

Love marriage comes in with lots of expectations while arranged marriages have fewer... However, success rates are entirely dependent on individuals who are either wiling to make it or break it... 

I am not vouching against &quot;love&quot; marriage here.. But just wanted to put forward my thoughts here that ,Any relationship should have a boundary.. One cannot build a relationship without understanding where it heads towards... Or one cannnot begin a relationship with an open end (which means I&#039;ll hang on as long as it lasts(?) )... As we all know life is full of adjustments and compromises,be it in an arranged marriage or a love marriage as this is not utopia...!!! :) But what boils down is how much happy we are in discovering our renewed appreciation to our new lives together... :)

And, sex is just a part of marriage and  love neither arises or sets there...!!! :) Let us not confine the beautiful relationship of togetherness to the stereotypical &quot;suhag raat&quot; shown in the Bollywood...!!!

What we are today is what we chose yesterday... So irrespectve of whether we chose arranged or love marriage, depends entirely on if we are willing to give our 100% or more to make it or break it..!!!(?)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">365375@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2009 01:54:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Loser</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-350459</link>
<description>I have had an arranged marriage and we are still married after 7 years - as parents to our daughter. Arranged marriage works for  certain kind of people...who have subdued tastes and live life as per norms. But for slightly weird, intense and off-beat people like me, compatibility issues in an arrange marriage can take gigantic proportions that are hard to resolve, yet leave you stuck - because the incompatibility is emotional, there is no real solid excuse for a divorce. O watever! Welcome to the world of loveless room mate marriages...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">350459@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:59:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-344012</link>
<description>Just so we don&#039;t get our wires crossed, Deepti, I am referring to the state of Indian men in general. Given that the average age of marriage is 19-20, they are at best callow youths, with no exposure or even understanding of the female orgasm. To expect them to spend their &quot;first night&quot; patiently awakening a tired and tense bride into sexual fulfilment is really asking for too much.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">344012@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:11:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-344009</link>
<description>In that case Deepti, I recommend reading any serious study of sexual relations in India.
Sudhir Kakkar is a good start:
http://www.flipkart.com/sudhir-kakkar/</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">344009@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:05:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepti Lamba</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343964</link>
<description>And then Deepa there are those who would beg to differ;)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343964@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:25:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343957</link>
<description>For women, commonsense, love at first sex is an impossibility. With men being what they are, i.e., usually inexperienced and downright clueless, it is usually painful and bewilderingly sticky and the hurt lasts for multiple nights. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343957@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:09:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by commonsense</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343934</link>
<description>love at first sex is not an impossibility.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343934@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:19:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kerty</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343820</link>
<description>correction:......At the outset, there is nothing on the plate other than resolve and commitment to make it work and make it last - and faith in a tradition......(para 3)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343820@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:11:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kaffir</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343819</link>
<description>correction: ...I wouldn&#039;t know about &quot;anyone else,&quot;...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343819@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:41:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kaffir</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343809</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Is it just me, or does anyone else see the irony of an arranged marriage advertisement that promises love?&lt;/i&gt;

I haven&#039;t done a survey so I wouldn&#039;t know about &quot;everyone else,&quot; but speaking for myself, I certainly do not see the irony that you do. Then again, I do appreciate the value of an &quot;arranged&quot; marriage and don&#039;t summarily dismiss it as antiquated or regressive, while also being accepting of other people&#039;s choice to go for &quot;love marriage&quot; if that&#039;s what works for them.

Question: Why do you need others to validate your view (of seeing irony in this)? If you see irony in it and don&#039;t want an &quot;arranged&quot; marriage for *yourself*, good for you. From your post, it seems that you have certain notions of romantic love which are quite subjective (which is fine), and that&#039;s what is driving you to extrapolate and make sweeping statements about &quot;arranged marriage&quot; in general.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343809@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:41:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kerty</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343808</link>
<description>Deepa

Very thoughtful and thought-provoking observations. Many of us who have seen arranged marriages up close and gone thru them ourselves can relate to what you have observed.

I will add few of mine.

- love is not always at first sight. Attraction and romance can also develop over a time. Both persons are no better than strangers while they are falling in love, while trying to discover each other. same process can occur after marriage too.

- Arranged marriage creates the biggest challenge for persons and biggest test for their personal ability to love - to love another person unconditionally, even when love and attraction may not manifest on day one, even when person may have obvious flaws or incompatibility. There is only on the plate other than resolve and commitment to make it work and make it last - and faith in a tradition - a tradition built on a belief that each human is inherently lovable, and each human is inherently capable of loving another human being unconditionally - that is the sole foundation of arranged marriage, at whose alter, countless couples have built enduring relationships for ages. That is why it is humanism in action - To create humanity built on unconditional love - where people love one another unconditionally without preconditions, thru thick and thin - and build such humanity one family at a time. That must be the original idea behind arranged marriages - how the concept has strayed and evolved from its basic premise, how parents and families have made it into a vanity fair of preconditions and commercializations is quite stark in the age of individualism. But than love marriages too has not fared any better - Union out of love is a natural and desirable concept but how something so noble and desirable has been ridden with its own pre-conditions and conditional love, that demands we can love each other only if it matches our own personal interests, and love dies the minute those conditions change or our interests change. Thus love marriages are known more for falling out of love than staying in love. Because, in most cases and predictably so, love of lovers is not able to go beyond its thrill-seeking stage, and conditional mindset on which love of lovers is predicated never allows it to outgrow maze of conditions and self-interests. 

- Physical attraction, romance, thrill of discovering each other physically creates euphoria during courtship phase and initial stages of relationship, but they are skin deep, temporary, transient, evolving. They have to go beyond and deeper. Over time, they give way to tenderness, companionship, caring, nurturing, looking after each other, being there for each other, building something bigger than themselves ie their own family. Love and intimacy are present but they may no longer get expressed by exchanging valentine cards, flowers, gifts or holding hands or public exhibition of love - lovers usually move on to create their own subtle and mundane expressions of love, and find their own highly personalized way of expressing them - one can say, love gets thoroughly personalized and domesticated.

There is nothing romantic about child raising, running a household, making a living, making ends meet, meeting social obligations - these are the things bulk of couple&#039;s life is made of. Romance and love are false advertising to suck us all in - life that follows has no much to do with it. It takes lot more to make it all work - that is where arranged marriages might offer a better edge.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343808@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:02:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vinod Joseph</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343806</link>
<description>Deepa, I agree with your thesis on the practical nature of love that is generated out of arranged marriages. Makes sense. And I am sure Darwin would approve. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343806@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:38:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ajoy Varghese</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-343805</link>
<description>Hi, Deepa
I guess that anything that conflicts with our unbridled belief in the correctness of our cultural value of self-interest and self-preservation would be confusing. However, the world would stop if people were not other centred umpteen times in a myriad of ways every single day!
Most married couples -either arranged marriage or otherwise - would happily admit that the arrival of a child brings much pleasure and the joy amidst the added responsibilities. Maybe, that&#039;s how we are meant to be - to include others into our circle (and not just always seek our own pleasure and interest). After all, didnt the parents include the other first before including the child?! And perhaps, its deeper than Darwin. Dont people include/adopt children who are not &quot;copies of themselves&quot;?
Ajoy</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343805@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:11:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zodiaclove</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-342633</link>
<description>yo 
I do not agree with what you said really.... 
please explain further a bit more for me ;D 
 
 
thank you</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">342633@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:47:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zodiaclove</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-342293</link>
<description>hi 
I do not agree with what you said really.... 
please explain in detail a bit more for me :d 
 
 
thanks</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">342293@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:51:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zodiaclove</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-341967</link>
<description>hey 
I don&#039;t  agree with what you wrote really.... 
please explain in detail a bit more for me ;D 
 
 
thanks</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">341967@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zodiaclove</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-341865</link>
<description>hey 
I do not agree with what you said really.... 
please ellaberate a bit more for me ;d 
 
 
cheers</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">341865@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:00:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Thinker</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-340002</link>
<description>Love is not a commodity to be exchanged or bargained for a price.Love is abstract in nature,it is an innate feeling that comes in one through constant attachment intimacy and sharing of concerns for each other.It is immaterial whether union of the two is brought through arranged means or by friendship.It is misleading to suggest that arranged marriage is love-less and it is the birth of the child that generates bonding.Do not marriages after long courtship end up in agony and disasters?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">340002@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:22:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-335816</link>
<description>I rephrased this on my personal blog - here&#039;s what I wrote:

&quot;If you ask me, I think the truth is that a very different sort of love develops in Indian marriages - and it is not between the husband and the wife. Parenthood - and the love of children - is the Big Love in an Indian marriage. It seems to me that when a child comes along, many couples put romantic love on the back-burner as they find a fiercer, deeper maternal or paternal love that all but consumes them. The legendary Indian attachment to children burns brighter than anything else, and provides life-long sustenance to the marriage, replacing notions of romantic and sexual love.&quot;

Reflects my views better.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335816@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:03:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-335798</link>
<description>I think the subject of arranged marriage is coming up more and more as Westerners embrace more Eastern thought.  LATimes wrote a story on the subject and HBO is even planning a TV show on the concept:

http://www.trendhunter.com/trends/hbo-now-casting-volunteers-for-upcoming-reality-tv-show-arranged-marriage</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335798@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:34:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ledzius</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-335784</link>
<description>First of all, I don&#039;t think that people hooking up through matrimonial sites falls strictly into the class of &quot;arranged marriages&quot;. Matrimonial sites are not that different from dating websites in the west and serve only as a means of introduction. How a couple takes the relationship from there on is entirely up to them. Many have a long period of courtship before they decide to take the plunge. (I even know cases where couples, after having been even physical, have broken up.) In that respect I don&#039;t think it is all that different from dating.

In fact, I suspect, more youngsters in India now have an active courtship and dating scene thanks to these websites. Imagine if they had to leave everything in the hands of their parents.




</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335784@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:01:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ritu</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2008/06/25/102541.php#comment-335781</link>
<description>Deepa,

Strange as it sounds, I have seen it. Honestly, if you ask me that initial uncontrollable highs and lows phase of romantic love is not really love. That is the infatuation part of it. That does not sustain. Neither in love marriages nor arranged ones. To me, true love is deeper, calmer and more enduring in nature. It is the sustained attraction and chemistry between two individuals. The kind of thing that persists even after seeing all the warts. And believe me that is quite rare (look at any couple any where who has been married for more than 15 years). I think you are just blessed if you can get that in your life. I have observed that equations change constantly and after a while, how you got married equalizes and both set of couples are pretty much on the same playing ground.

But, yes, if your point is about how to summon romantic love for a stranger I can quite agree with you. I for one would not be able to summon feelings on demand for a person.  Yet, I have seen so many different equations that I can safely say that romantic love(of the heady variety) is very much a part of the arranged marriage scenario. Usually, it has a time lag. Which means it probably manifests 6-7 months after people get married.

Let me give you an example. I have a friend who went through the arranged marriage route and quite early in life. Right after he started working. He had absolutely no attraction for his wife. During their courtship period (he was in Delhi and she in Surat), he would call her every saturday mainly as a chore. And being slightly parsimonious in his ways, he would put the phone down after the STD bill crossed 100 Rs. :). After they got married, their initial chemistry was nil. They gradually settled in to each other. But surprisingly after 4 years of their marriage they suddenly went through a completely love-in-the-eyes phase. The chemistry suddenly sizzled. It was quite amusing.

The usual engagement-courtship-marriage kind of scenario that most arranged marriages follow give the couple sufficient time to get into the in-love phase.

Personally, as I said, I don&#039;t know if it would work for me. It&#039;s like you don&#039;t have a choice but to fall in love. But I have seen enough people do it all the time and it seems like a formula that works atleast 50% of the times. So never say never &amp;#61514;

Cheers
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335781@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:37:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>