OPINION

Condoms - For Men Only?

March 19, 2008
Sakshi Juneja

If you are above the age of 18, a male and seeking a job that combines work with pleasure, here is an unusual opening that promises a combination of both. The post of a condom tester is up for grabs as Durex, one of the world's largest condom manufacturer has announced plans to recruit Indian males above the age of 18 to test their products. [Link]

Interesting. Encouraging. But sexist, no doubt about it.

My annoyance with the above (so-called) new age initiative is due to the fact that the woman has been excluded so easily from Durex's consumer involvement programme.

This, to me, is nothing but just another example of how our society perceives a woman's worth, especially in the matters related to S-E-X.  The notion that it is the man who is in-charge of the sexual practice, whereas the woman is merely the means to reach an orgasm – is a load of shit but then again something crapped by many of us.

Agreed, they are manufacturing male condoms therefore their primary target is the man. And this holds even more weight when it comes to Gay couples. However it wouldn't be wrong to assume that condoms are mostly put to use by Heterosexual couples.

Heterosexual couples. Meaning Man and Woman.

durex_condom_ad Agreed, it is the man who wears it but then again it is the woman who takes that rubber film within her. And so by all means, she has an equal right to choose and evaluate the kind of rubber film she wants entering her (extremely) personal space. I mean come on, so many outside objects coming your way, one definitely deserves some privileges.

Therefore ideally speaking – Durex's highly enterprising offer should have been open for both the sexes.

But let's take reality into account. I'm referring to the stuck up mentality of the society we live in. I, for one, can totally understand the hesitation on the manufacturer's side; in a country where a woman gets snubbed for even saying the word "sex" out loud, it's literally a death wish for a company to promote ideas that encourage women in sexual matters.

And unfortunately for the time being, playing into such societal prejudices seems to be the only way to move forward. Hopefully tomorrow will bring forth an unbiased perspective.

Saakshi O. Juneja is an active blogger, feminist and overboard dog lover. Currently working as a Business Development Manager for a sportswear manufacturing company in Mumbai, India. Did graduation in Marketing & Advertising from Sydney, Australia. As far as blogging is concerned...is a complete Blog-a-holic.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Deepti Lamba
URL
March 19, 2008
01:30 PM

Have you noticed even in the IPill ad they show married couples always. They don't want to be lynched, right?;)

They should do research on Female condoms- seem to be far more inconvenient than the male condoms

#2
perihelionflux
URL
March 20, 2008
12:53 AM

would you be equally aghast if some company just scouted for women to try their new IUD or pills or 'whatever ' contraceptive used by females?since it is men whose precious, golden semen would be pulverized by such devices?

and maybe we should thank gay men for turning the pardigm of 'man-inserts-foreign-objects-into- women's-extremely-private-space' on its head by inserting their foreign objects into men's not-meant-to-be-inserted-into private space? we have to be thankful for whatever little change we can get into our edict-comandeered societies, even if it comes from gay men..

#3
kerty
March 20, 2008
02:07 AM

Lots of men do not like rubber because it makes sex feel so artificial, unnatural to them. Rubbers during Nirodh era came with sizes that could not fit all individuals with their unique sizes and contours - so it turned off lots of men from using condoms. So it makes sense to direct the awareness and education for rubber use to be aimed at men. Women have traditionally borne the consequences of unprotected sex and lack of contraception. So this is positive development that rubber awareness is directed at men and women should welcome it.

#4
Vardhan
March 21, 2008
02:21 AM

[EDITED - IP BANNED]

#5
Vardhan
March 21, 2008
03:33 AM

I just said that Renuka Chowdhury has introduced condoms for women? why should the IP be banned?

#6
Aaman
URL
March 21, 2008
03:43 AM

You are spewing irrelevant stuff on multiple threads - cease and desist

#7
Vardhan
March 21, 2008
03:46 AM

with due respect, I am commenting on topics with a header line.

The heder line spoke about "Men condoms". I have spoken about "women condoms". If this is a debate, please bring two sides to the coin. I am saying with due respect.

I don't spew. I am telling the truth.

#8
Ms. Anona
March 21, 2008
05:35 AM

Welcome to the electronic equivalent of Communist China, where the qualifications to become a DC writer are kept secret and confidential. You are constantly monitored and may be edited or banned at any time. Maybe you should send in some greenbacks, that'll do it!

#9
All-night-long
March 21, 2008
07:09 AM

Durex says.."What one gets in return besides the products is a gift hamper and other incentives. One lucky Condom Tester will bag the employee bonus of an all expenses paid holiday for two at a romantic getaway. Other bonus prizes include iPODs and gift vouchers. Company officials add that all Condom Testers would be provided with a certificate that endorses their participation in the programme and gives them the status of a good lover!"

I agree COMPLETELY with you Sakshi...lets test it TOGETHER...lets be very thorough....we'll measure the co-efficient of thermal expansion,viscosity,density to penetration ratio,fatigue under multiple orgasms,the inverse of the lubrication value divided by the passion/emotion parameter multiplied by the penis/envy ratio....C'mon Sakshi..don't hesitate..You've stiffened my resolve already;)

#10
Ms. Anona
March 21, 2008
12:20 PM

Yeh, whisper some applied physics in my ear, baby!

#11
Ravi Kulkarni
March 21, 2008
08:05 PM

I am just wondering how do they test them, without the second party involvement? Sakshi, your concern may be misplaced after all, they must have invited an equal number of eligible women as well, just a little more discretely.

#12
Amrita
URL
March 22, 2008
01:52 AM

Ravi - I think testers are being given the big bucks or latex or what have you to bring their own partner. :)

#13
reader
March 22, 2008
03:42 AM

Amirta,

Well said....hehehee :)

#14
Slime_id
March 20, 2009
01:49 PM

UK Government campaign says condoms make women sexier

Ministers have been accused of promoting promiscuity after launching a new campaign to encourage young women to carry condoms.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5020731/Government-campaign-says-condoms-make-women-sexier.html

#15
kaffir
March 20, 2009
02:08 PM

Without any details as to what's the nature of testing, and whether women's input will be useful or not, this post comes across as making a mountain out of a molehill and based on speculation/assumptions.

#16
Aditi N
March 20, 2009
02:27 PM

Sakshi: Most quality control procedures for condoms are w.r.t size and strength/durability. They are not w.r.t how the condom works during sex. As such the requirement is for the people who have a functional penis...which would be men.

The link you have provided describes why the study will be conducted.

"In 2007, a two-year study by Indian Council of Medical Research had concluded that condoms made according to international sizes are too large for a majority of Indian men. This led to a call for condoms of varying sizes to be made more widely available in India"

One of the biggest causes of condom failure is due to its "slipping off" and this is likelier to happen if the condom is too big. Hence the study will customize condoms for men.

The other quality control tests which subject the condoms to "sex like" rigors to test its durability are performed using simulation machines, not humans.

I personally don't think this is sexist. Research conducted to test the functionality of diaphragms would've included women.

#17
Slime_id
March 20, 2009
02:43 PM

Condoms are slippery anyways, they need to be slippery else they wont fit in the first place. Then it is upto the partners and the test agency to define how it can slip off easily.

well this was an old article year 2008 , the new trend is that UK government says condoms are sexy to be carried by young women just like a mobile phone. i found it disgusting for a government health minister who is also a woman to promote this. ( year 2009)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5020731/Government-campaign-says-condoms-make-women-sexier.html

well how can a condom become sexier in 1 yr for young women? Test agencies have attended any fashion shows?

#18
smallsquirrel
March 20, 2009
03:22 PM

oh. my. god.

slime, I am now convinced you are a 17 year old virgin. "Condoms are slippery anyways, they need to be slippery else they wont fit in the first place."

WHOT?!??!?! on what planet??? they do not need to be slippery in order to be rolled on man. it is lubricated on the OUTSIDE to aide penetration.

wow.

#19
slime_id
March 20, 2009
03:38 PM

ss, thanks for the compliment. glad u think I am one.

#20
slime_id
March 20, 2009
03:53 PM

ss, BTW, you told me last you wont speak to me ever! so u stick to your thinking? or was this was a slip of toungue?


#21
slime_id
March 20, 2009
03:57 PM

ss, honestly if condoms were not slippery, how could they be rolled on instantly using deft fingers?

If condoms were not slippery( on outside offcours), it wud be ages for the condom to test fitted.

#22
Aditi N
March 20, 2009
05:11 PM

Being slippery (lubricated?) and slipping off are two different issues. A loose fitting condom can slip off easily during intercourse or upon withdrawal which would defeat the purpose of a contraceptive and can lead to unwanted pregnancies or STDs.

#23
commonsense
March 20, 2009
05:23 PM

slime ID: condoms are "slimy" AND slippery...

#24
Slime_id
March 21, 2009
12:02 AM

Here is the slimy link from the government of UK

nds.coi.gov.uk/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.asp?MediaDetailsID=268745

Press Release â€" 0.01am 20 March 09

CONDOM CONFIDENCE BOOSTS WOMEN’S SEX APPEAL
• Carrying Condoms no longer taboo as women today twice as likely to carry condoms than their mother’s generation



#25
temporal
URL
March 21, 2009
11:01 AM

some of the comments here remind me of the recent comment on the subject by that bavarian papa who is alleged to never having had sex with a partner...two or four legged...

and now i melt away in darkness leaving the field to (s)experts

;)

Add your comment



Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!