Desicritics Comments on Hillary Clinton's Current Obama Drama

Comment by Chandra

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:31:30 EST

See this interesting Obama video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzFOOcEQtP0

Comment by commonsense

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:41:28 EST

to quote allen ginsberg ("howl", of course) I have seen the best minds of my generation Destroyed by madness

Comment by drunken noodle

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:09:50 EST

Heads up! Heads up! Here's another one! And a - and another one OOHHHHHHHH!!! Yeek yeek woop woop!! why you all in my ear?! Talking a whole bunch of shit That I ain't trying to hear! Get back ! You don't know me like that! (Get back !! You don't know me like that!!) Yeek yeek woop woop!! I ain't playing around! Make one false move I'll take ya down Get back ! You don't know me like that! (Get back !! You don't know me like that!!)

Comment by Aditi Nadkarni

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:28:51 EST

commonsense: Drunken Noodle, out of lack of originality, is quoting lyrics from OutKast's Church :) Drunken Noodle: To quote Outkast (I love em too) yet again: "You need to git up, git out, cut that bullshit out Ain't you sick and tired of having to do without And what up with all these questions? As act as though you know somethin I don't. Do you have any suggestions?" In short: If you can't stay on topic.....EXIT=> ...you get the drift. :)

Comment by commonsense

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:52:36 EST

Oops, the noodle is drunk!

Comment by Drunken Noodle

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:36:47 EST

Life, is nothin but a dream, so peaceful and serene Unless you're bein evil then you on the devil's team Well I receive what you want to believe But soon you'll have to sew those bad seeds Please, any man can ask, to get a pass or a cleansing of sin to grant another chance Perhaps another glance of the light at the end of the tunnel Talk to the coach or break out the huddle Whatever should you fumble your rebuttal should be subtle Cause he who lives in the upper room is never gullible As you survey the syllables and sentences The question that I'm merely tryin to pose is as simple as me sayin

Comment by commonsense

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:30:24 EST

Some Noodle wrote: ""Whatever should you fumble your rebuttal..."" Totally confused! Do you mean if I fumble my butt?? What does that mean?? If you do it, please stop fumbling with my butt...no iffs or butts...

Comment by commonsense

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:08:19 EST

Some Noodle wrote: ""Whatever should you fumble your rebuttal..."" Or does rebuttal mean, sticking a new one on after it is damaged by a kick?

Comment by commonsense

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:41:59 EST

Some Noodle wrote: ""Whatever should you fumble your rebuttal..."" rebuttal? a double kick on the ass?

Comment by Chandra

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:37:54 EST

I think Iraq has improved substantially since gates and petraeus took over. Rummy was an ostrich. I expect significat improvement by the end of the year. However, one cannot say the same wrt Iran. They are spoiling for a fight.

Comment by temporal

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:30:46 EST

chandra bhai i have not said anything about 2004 ---- yet:) khair all that is water under the bridge iraq is bad enough let us hope haliburton is denied the opportunity to rake in more billions in iran and let the new administration sort out iraq

Comment by Chandra

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:14:26 EST

T I have read about this across the Internet but am not sure what to believe or what not believe. Personally i believe in the political process and the reality is that John Kerry ran a poor campaign in 2004 and lost. McCain will have to find a Titanic boat (vs Swift boat) to sink the Dems this year

Comment by temporal

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:05:28 EST

chandra: only yesterday i made a reference to my fickle memory...but really....it ain't THAT fickle! the 2000 elections were stolen by the republicans (ok no cut n pastes - but just run your own research....read up on the new american century) the neoconzix saw they could implement their agenda better through dubya and when you do your homework on the new american century you will see for yourself how many of them were eased into the dubya administration and maneuvered this (record holder of the lowest IQ of all US presidents) president into the iraq quagmire and in this lame duck year they nearly succeeded to drag US into iran as well (somebody in the pentagon "released" the study that said Iran never had a nuclear programme to release the air out of the neoconzix driven baloon) khair, do your homework:)

Comment by Chandra

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:50:00 EST

Common Sense We dont need a third party, we just need the Govt to mind its own business. We need a Govt that prepares the poorest to particpate in the Global eceonomy. On all the other things the govt counts to nothing ;-)

Comment by Chandra

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:46:09 EST

T arre baba...ye kya cut paste kiye ho aap? :-) Well, i dont know about Florida. I mean, it was depressing at that time but if one recalls the campaign that Gore ran, it was embarassing to say the least. Bush campaigned very well in 2000. He had an outstanding record then - he won two terms as Gov in Texas, was promising change in washington, staying away from nation building, cutting deficits and most importantly he came with an outstanding reputation of having worked with the Dems in Texas. We know what he did once in Govt. That is what wil happen with Rajneesh Obama :-)

Comment by commonsense

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:12:24 EST

I know I'm hallucinating, clamouring for a pie-in-the-sky before I die, but we need a third party...

Comment by temporal

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:54:18 EST

and the apology :

These led to an apology from Associate Justice John Paul Stevens for the behavior of the 5-to-4 majority of the Court in the matter of Bush v. Gore. Loser Bush then brought on undeclared wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the greatest deficits in our history and the revelations that the policies of an Administration that--much as Count Dracula fled cloves of garlic--flees all accountability were responsible for the murder and torture of captive men, between 70 percent and 90 percent of whom, by the Pentagon's estimate, had been swept up at random, earning us the hatred of a billion Muslims and the disgust of what is called the civilized world.

Comment by temporal

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:53:18 EST

here is one for florida;) http://www.gregpalast.com/florida-by-the-numbersal-gore-won-florida-in-2000-by-77000-votes/ ohio was decided by one vote in the supreme court;)

Comment by temporal

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:49:11 EST

here is one for florida;) http://www.gregpalast.com/florida-by-the-numbersal-gore-won-florida-in-2000-by-77000-votes/ ohio was decided by one vote in the supreme court;)

Comment by Chandra

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:58:25 EST

T He lost both Ohio and Florida. http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/OH/frameset.exclude.html The point i was making is he could have been President without winning anything in the south. I expect the same for the Dems this year. Unless of course the republicans do something really stupid or the economy goes to the dogs..... rgds

Comment by temporal

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:14:03 EST

chandra: but he did win (ohio for sure) ;) in 2000 Gore would have won the elections without winning the South, all he had to do was to win Ohio or Florida. and was "robbed" by the neoconzix "reach"

Comment by Chandra

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:09:01 EST

T Actually I dont think anybody has become president without winning a few in the south since 1956 (Eisenhower). However,in 2000 Gore would have won the elections without winning the South, all he had to do was to win Ohio or Florida. The fact of the matter is that the margins are huge in the south and therefore the dems will have to expect a massive swing to win a few electoral votes . One can however assume some states in the mountains and the mid-west to swing blue.

Comment by temporal

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:09:48 EST

#35: chandra south is the key...do not under estimate its potential power look at the results from the past five elections...the winning team won the south (in addition to east west and northeast...)

Comment by Drunken Noodles

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:29:46 EST

@ Seema Whatever should you fumble your rebuttal should be subtle Cause he who lives in the upper room is never gullible

Comment by Morris

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:07:39 EST

Chandra I am not sure what you mean by coming back to the White House. They are there now Bush being Repub. It is possible that Obama or Hillary can lose to the Repub nominee. Do not underestmate their election fighing skill.