OPINION

India's Monkey Business

November 02, 2007
Harold Bergsma

When animals are endangered we take immediate notice. But recently I had to smile a bit, perhaps wryly, that those endangered were not mammals such as Asiatic Lions, vultures or River Dolphins but human beings. “Man Dies, Attacked by Monkeys in Delhi” “Tourist’s Spectacles Stolen by Monkey” “Monkey Business in Indian Airport” “Monkey Man with Iron Claws.” On and on, reports of huge numbers of monkeys in Delhi, perhaps more than twenty thousand, on the rampage. Stealing, snatching, entering dwellings, acting so aggressively that in spite of a reverence for the monkeys, people were picking up sticks and stones, even swords to drive them off, ward off the pests. Even tourists were endangered! My goodness, please not that! Such monkey business gets the attention of journalists, it makes interesting press. We read and shake our heads and smile and think, oh well, yes there is a problem but what can we do anyway?

I read also that a high Indian official had banned the export and sale of monkeys to the United States because the treatment they received had violated the agreements for how monkeys were to be handled. Some reports stated that twenty thousand Indian monkeys a year had been shipped for medical research purposes, such as the development of Polio vaccine. Now exportation was to stop. No more monkeys to be sold, at high cost, to the States.

What is the solution to this overpopulation problem of monkeys? Avenues for addressing the problem have been suggested by researchers but are then quickly dismissed. No killing of monkeys because of religious beliefs, Hanuman, and respect for monkeys in India! Removing and taking so many monkeys to remote areas was impossible and too costly and involved risks to humans and monkeys alike. Introduce larger Langurs which would chase them away; no, this only multiplies the problem. Birth control measures for monkeys would be difficult to administer and involve risks, moreover, would be costly and the drug’s effectiveness wears off unless consistent measures are applied. Sterilization of large populations of monkeys seemed difficult because of the lack of appropriate technologies to administer to so many animals safely, such as in tablet form. Injections require capture, sedation and risks to handlers. Status quo; no killing, no way to prevent monkey births, no way to sterilize and no way to sell them to an eager market. (It will take five years before the breeding facilities in the States will be able to supply the annual demand for monkeys for research and medical development.) Sounds grim.

Perhaps there is hope, however; in drugs which could be inserted into food and given to monkeys that could sterilize them. So far there does not appear to be any such drug available. Implants and injections are used widely for sterilization, but orally administered drugs have not been developed and used as far as I can ascertain. Could it be developed and administered safely and not cause a social problem? So many aspects of our environment are controlled, actively and passively by new inventions. Why not invent a safe sterilization agent to help solve the monkey problem? Actions need to be taken because there are possible serious health issues involved in the monkey and human interaction equation. In such cases science could inform politics.

The latest National Geographic Magazine, October 2007 has an excellent article by David Quammen, “Deadly Contact”, discussing zoonosis. Briefly, zoonosis means, “animal disease” and in this article it refers to such diseases in animals which jump to humans, “when pathogens leap”. Ebola Virus, SARS, HIV and even Monkey Pox are horrific diseases that ‘leap’ from animal populations to human beings with terrible consequences. Quammen makes the point that it takes certain viruses to leap across species barriers and they evolve quickly and are...”unaffected by antibiotics, they can be elusive, they can be versatile and they can inflict extremely high rates of mortality, and they are fiendishly simple.” He points out that close contact ... “between two species represents opportunity for a pathogen to expand its horizon and possibilities.” Pathogens take risks for the “big payoff”. Pathogens do not literally jump from one species to another; they are transported, carried by animals to people who contact animals in intimate ways. (I can hear the rattle of the small hand-held drum on the top of a stick announcing dholna that the monkey wallah is going to put on a show. Or is it the man with the dancing bear?) Intimate contact, prolonged intimate contact between animal species enhances the opportunity for viral transfer.

Many deadly viruses have been involved in Zoonosis in Africa where very intimate contacts were made with monkeys and apes. Very intimate simian contact! People ate them. Bush meat is one means many Africans have to get animal protein. The monkey or ape meat is not always thoroughly cooked; the meat is handled with no regard for hygiene. Live animals, particularly baby animals, are kept when their mothers are slaughtered, especially apes and monkeys.

I was surprised by one thing that was emphasized in Quammen’s article. Bats! Bats can carry deadly diseases such as the Hendra virus. Certain bats carry and die of rabies but can pass this deadly disease to other animals such as cows, dogs or directly to people. Hendra, the newly discovered viral disease is deadly. Bats, fruit bats, chimgadar, hang around in colonies and leave droppings of feces and urinate on grasses and leaves. Other animals such as cattle, birds and monkeys ingest feces and become infected. People eat the infected animals, or get into close touching contact with them and become infected. Many people eat with their hands, and many do not thoroughly wash before eating after handling dead animals. Africa has had tremendous problems with the spread of deadly disease through human contact with animals, particularly monkeys and apes.

Monkeys are a really big problem in India and their close and frequent contact with people creates a situation that may be optimal for zoonosis, that is, if a given virus is present at the right time that allows pathogens to make that crucial leap. The problem, monkeys, is multiplying rapidly without control; good sources of food are available, human food, often provided by kind ‘faithful’ people. Bandar log are becoming more aggressive and their fear of humans has diminished so they encroach intimately.

It is not just the nuisance factor of having too many monkeys around too many human beings. It is a matter of public health and safety. Solutions to the monkey problem can be found through scientific means. It is a matter of using reasoned care for precious human populations by India’s leaders, informed by researchers and public health workers. This is a problem that will only get worse. Monkey business is serious business.

Harold Bergsma has published widely in professional journals, and novels. In 2007, One Way To Pakistan was published and in April of 2007 was awarded the Indie Excellence Award for Multicultural Fiction.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Aaman
URL
November 2, 2007
12:46 AM

I think the monkeys want a piece of the development boom:)

#2
Jay
November 2, 2007
12:55 AM

Harold: If one of those Hindu fundamentalist groups gets a copy of your post you might get your effigy burnt for suggesting sterilization of monkeys...after all they will claim all monkeys are forms of Hanuman etc. The term "India's "monkey" business" has a pun between the lines!

Fun article this and quite an interesting topic to write about. I had no idea moneys were causing such havoc in India! :)

#3
Aaman
URL
November 2, 2007
01:09 AM

Money's causing a lot of havoc everywhere, sterilize all the money!

#4
Sanjay
November 2, 2007
01:36 AM

And you just know that the ethnic-baiting Leftists would have to insert their obligatory reference to "Hindu fundamentalists". They don't feel happy unless they can take that jab.

As I recall it was Indira Gandhi who pioneered the art of forced sterilizations -- on human beings -- during her illegal 1977 Emergency, which the Left wholeheartedly supported. Little bit of a selective memory there, pal?

#5
smallsquirrel
November 2, 2007
02:14 AM

and once again, sanjay is not happy unless he is contrarian, annoying and pissing on someone else's parade. you complain about off topic ranting on your own posts but then you go and do it to others!

anyway...

I like the monkeys in my neighborhood. then again, I have bars on my windows, and screens, and I never leave the balcony doors open. I have seen, however, the havoc they cause in neighbors' houses.

#6
Ledzius
November 2, 2007
07:03 AM

Aaman- does one get arrested for money chanting then?

#7
Deepti Lamba
URL
November 2, 2007
01:24 PM

Sanjay, quit monkeying around or else rabies shots!!;)

#8
temporal
URL
November 2, 2007
02:21 PM

harold:

another informative article

chuckled at this:

It is not just the nuisance factor of having too many monkeys around too many human beings.

shouldn't it be the other way round?


ss:

this sanjay is the whining sunjay - the one who introduces himself as the 'non-religious atheist' for crying out loud

so do not blaspheme!

#9
A. S. Mathew
November 2, 2007
05:16 PM

The vice-mayor of Delhi while relaxing at the balcony of his home in Delhi was attacked by a few monkeys. While avoiding the sharp attack,
he fell down and later on died at the hospital
due to head injuries.

While I was making a road trip from Delhi through
Hariyana, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, I was quite surprised to see the thousands of monkeys
on the road size as if waiting to welcome somebody. They were fed by many people, and the
sad thing is that the children look skinny and
pale and the parents feed the fat monkeys as if
a divine call. If the monkey population is not
controlled someway, it will create serious problems to human beings by way of spreading
diseases, besides unexpected attack.

#10
Prasad
November 3, 2007
02:58 AM

Hi Matthew probably you were on your Evangelical mission, its normal for you to hate Monkeys, one God less among 333 Million right?

#11
smallsquirrel
November 3, 2007
03:54 AM

hey, prasad... no need to be so nasty.

#12
Prasad
November 3, 2007
06:43 AM

Hi Matthew you are exaggerating, no body feeds Monkeys first and then their own Kids. Typical Missi-propaganda By the way what were you doing on the roadside from Punjab to Himachal? Got it. Handing out your Evangelical Literature? Do you?

#13
A. S. Mathew
November 3, 2007
06:48 AM

Mr. Prasad, I am simply telling the truth. I visit India more often for various purpose.
What solution you prescribe for this problem?
It will be a religious issue, however the
problem has to be addressed someday. Monkeys
will do everything unexpected when they get hungry.

#14
A. S. Mathew
November 3, 2007
06:58 AM

Mr. Prasad, I didn't say that the people were
feeding the monkeys first, then the children.
I am sure that the parents feed the children.
Please don't read blank pages.

#15
Deepti Lamba
URL
November 3, 2007
08:59 AM

Feeding rogue monkeys on roads is hazardous for obvious reasons but people are either ignorant or plain stupid, it got nothing to do with religious sentiments.

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/6670)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!