Eklavya's Oscar Selection: Vidhu Vinod Chopra Speaks Out
Steven Baker
The selection of Eklavya: The Royal Guard as the Indian official entry for the Oscars, has caused an unprecedented filmi commotion. In a storyline straight out of Hindi cinema, filmmaker Bhawana Talwar has loudly criticized the Film Federation of India; alleging that the jury was corrupt and that her film Dharam should have been selected instead.
Preparing to depart for a US promotional tour that starts with a panel discussion for the Asia Society in New York, Chopra appears unphased by his detractors. From his Mumbai office, Director Vidhu Vinod Chopra stated, "Ms. Talwar is creating a controversy which can only damage the Indian film industry's reputation internationally. I am very sorry that this had happened".
Talwar's first scene saw her accuse Sudhir Mishra of corruption. But that did not stick. As the in-front-of-the-scenes dust-up continues, her current accusation is that Ranjit Bahadur was the editor on the making of Eklavya, and therefore should not have been on the jury. Although a film maker herself, Talwar seems unaware that it is trade practice that making of films are outsourced to independent production houses who are at liberty to hire any technicians they choose. Ranjit Bahadur has no direct association with Vinod Chopra Films.
Here the plot thickens, while Ms. Talwar is accusing Ranjit of prejudice, she is overlooking the connection of Mr. Nadeem Khan and Vinod Chopra. Classmates from the Film and Television Institute of India, where they were close friends, Nadeem Khan was the cameraman on Vinod Chopra's first film, Murder at Monkey Hill. Khan later did additional camerawork on 1942: A Love Story. And why, you may ask, is Ms. Talwar overlooking this connection?
Because Nadeem Khan voted for her film.
Chopra signs off, "The Hindi film industry is a close-knit space and most people, at some point, have crossed professional paths. If Ms. Talwar had objections to this jury, she should have raised them before submitting her film so the jury could have been changed and new members found. But she went to the media only when her own film was not chosen."
Eklavya's Oscar Selection: Vidhu Vinod Chopra Speaks Out
RSS:
- Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds for:
- » Comments on this article
- » Media
- » Media: Films - Bollywood
- » Media: Film - Directors
- » Media: News
- » Desicritics.org articles by Steven Baker
- » All News articles
- » All Desicritics.org articles













Deepti Lamba
URL
September 29, 2007
05:08 AM
Sour grapes me thinks?;) Thanks for the insights Steve.
Steven Baker
September 29, 2007
05:23 AM
That could be it Deepti.
It is unfortunate that the selection has generated such controversy.
Let us hope that this heightened level of interest in the film, will have some positive impact in creating pre-Oscar buzz at an international level.
LighterVein
URL
September 29, 2007
07:43 AM
As per me, Eklavya was a better option. As Chopra says, "She should have raised a hue before submission". Surely he grapes are sour as Deepti says.
Sirius
September 29, 2007
01:01 PM
It is a good choice, methinks. Why should formula films always be selected or those with big banners behind them?
Steven Baker
September 29, 2007
02:25 PM
Sirius and LighterVein, thanks for expressing your views.
I personally feel jo hona tha ho chukka hai. is tarah ladne se kuch nahee hoga.
Add your comment
(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/6420)