<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Hinduism, the Buddha, and Other Musings</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:51:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Kalyani</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-302544</link>
<description>Deepa, nice article and very informative inspite of having a light touch. 
Thanks,I learnt a lot.
Why did they never teach us all this? 
Why don&#039;t we?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">302544@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:51:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vidyardhi Nanduri</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-302465</link>
<description>SUB: GET ORGANIZED &gt; BASE STRUCTURE NECESSITY_DEMAND_CURIOSITY_SUSTENANCE 
Base structure for intellectual interaction is
missing . How can original works flourish ?
The Cosmic Puzzle attracts Scientists, Philosophers
and all mankind in several disciplines in search of divinity of the Human
Being and Nature.
Presently Cosmology is undergoing REVISION and BIG-BANG, 
Dark Matter,DARK ENERGY and Blackholes are all under question. 
Evolution needs to catch up with creation. 
These books provide search links,routes and many COSMOS QUESTIONS 
that form links to COSMOS YOGA SERIES as follow-up.

PURPOSE OF INTERLINKS: 
1. The Science of Philosophy: Divinity,Vedas, Upanishads, Temples &amp; Yoga 
2. Philosophy of Science : Plasmas,Electro-magnetic fields and Cosmology 
3. Resource : Reflectors,3-Tier Consciousness, Source, Fields and Flows 
4. Noble Cause : Human-Being, Environment,Divine Nature and Harmony

http://www.buymyebook.com/buy/authorinfo.asp?EbookId=1019 
FOR INTEGRATION: Science,Philosophy and Religion 
Unity of Consciousness in Science,Religion and Philosophy 
http://www.buymyebook.com/buy/authorinfo.asp?EbookId=239                   
Vidyardhi Nanduri 
Cosmology World Peace 
  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">302465@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:53:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepti Lamba</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288748</link>
<description>Religion can be a way of life if we don&#039;t get dogmatic and take it with a pinch of salt;)

Deepa, despite the temple&#039;s color scheme making you wince that pic looks quite beautiful to my nostalgic eyes:) </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288748@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Sep 2007 13:16:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Buddha is not  Hindu Avatar</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288739</link>
<description>budha the so called gautama budha is not the incarnation of lord vishnu
he is an absolute escapist of the world...nyways
there is a avatara of lord vishnu which is called as &quot;ADI-BUDHA&quot; which all the gautama budha lovers are not familiar with there were rashasas called as tripuraasuras
these rakshasaas had wives who are pativratas and these demons used to create hell in the world then lord vishnu took the avatara of &quot;adi-budha&quot; visits the wives of tripurasuras and willargue with them on the non-existance of god (nastia vada) the three wives got a slight doubt whether god exists or not and that was the moment lord vishnu destroys the tripurasuras.

this is the story inthe purana and this has been told by sri swaroopanandendra saraswati maharaj of dwaraka and jyotish matt he has said it in hyderabad very recently and i have a mobile video of it 
please dont mess our ancient dharma with gautama budha as one of the dasa avataras..
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288739@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:24:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288708</link>
<description>I found this definition which I think sums things up pretty nicely:

&quot;It is apparent that religion can be seen as a theological, philosophical, anthropological, sociological, and psychological phenomenon of human kind. To limit religion to only one of these categories is to miss its multifaceted nature and lose out on the complete definition.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288708@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Sep 2007 06:13:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sujai</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288680</link>
<description>#7, Deepa Krishnan:
&lt;i&gt;Hmm. I see no difference between religion and philosophy. Isn&#039;t religion merely a codified expression of an underlying philosophy?&lt;/i&gt;

After writing so many enlightening articles, you stump me completely!

Are you serious?  Look at each religion on this planet and study them carefully and see how different the religion is from its underlying philosophy. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288680@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:11:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deepa Krishnan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288659</link>
<description>Hmm. I see no difference between religion and philosophy. Isn&#039;t religion merely a codified expression of an underlying philosophy?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288659@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:00:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by harold bergsma</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288656</link>
<description>Deepa, What a nice article. The addition of pictures made the text vivid. I have struggled with the idea, the concept of &#039;agnostic&#039;. I have been amazed by those who only know, suredly, because a book said so. People of the book, Jews, Muslims and Christians and perhaps others back into an a-priori argument, that is their books from which all knowledged and inspiration comes. In essence then the book becomes the devine. Agnostics as I understand them simply state that they don&#039;t know. It interests me that some can &quot;believe in the Vedas&quot; yet not etc.
How do you understand agnosticism? Do you consider it a religious belief or a philosophical stance? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288656@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Sep 2007 21:26:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288563</link>
<description>deepa:

&lt;i&gt;Why, instead of acceptance and liberalism, do they transmit so much dogma and uninformed nonsense?&lt;/i&gt;

vested interest?:)

as kabir said:
&lt;i&gt;Kahet Kabir Suno Bhai Sadho
Mein To Hun Viswas Mein&lt;/i&gt;

_______________________________________________

here is kabir in full:

&lt;i&gt;Moko Kahan Dhundhere Bande
Mein To Tere Paas Mein
Na Teerath Mein, Na Moorat Mein
Na Ekant Niwas Mein
Na Mandir Mein, Na Masjid Mein
Na Kabe Kailas Mein
Mein To Tere Paas Mein Bande
Mein To Tere Paas Mein
Na Mein Jap Mein, Na Mein Tap Mein
Na Mein Barat Upaas Mein
Na Mein Kiriya Karm Mein Rehta
Nahin Jog Sanyas Mein 
Nahin Pran Mein Nahin Pind Mein
Na Brahmand Akas Mein
Na Mein Prakuti Prawar Gufa Mein
Nahin Swasan Ki Swans Mein
Khoji Hoye Turat Mil Jaoon
Ik Pal Ki Talas Mein
Kahet  Kabir Suno Bhai Sadho
Mein To Hun Viswas Mein&lt;/i&gt;

Translation

Where do you search me?
I am with you
Not in pilgrimage, nor in icons
Neither in solitudes
Not in temples, nor in mosques
Neither in Kaba nor in Kailash
I am with you o man
I am with you
Not in prayers, nor in meditation
Neither in fasting
Not in yogic exercises
Neither in renunciation
Neither in the vital force nor in the body 
Not even in the ethereal space 
Neither in the womb of Nature 
Not in the breath of the breath
Seek earnestly and discover
In but a moment of search
Says Kabir, Listen with care
Where your faith is, I am there.

(translation credit to the kabir website)
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288563@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:30:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tanay</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288561</link>
<description>Interesting article. Thanks for sharing lots of new info.

You can take a peek into one of the best temples in the Orissa style of architecture and design. I had made a &lt;a href=&quot;http://desicritics.org/2007/01/10/135750.php&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;post here at DC.&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288561@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:27:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A. S. Mathew</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288534</link>
<description>We can see fancy cathedrals of great arts in Europe, and many of them are getting empty and
turning into beautiful monuments, since religious
interests are gradually fading there.  On the other hand, in the U.S., Church buildings are
being made as movie theaters with T.V. screens
everywhere.  

We all need a comortable place to worship God but when the building becomes God, there is a variation in our focus at God.  As a deep believer in God from the very childhood, I find
God&#039;s closeness in a Church building as well as
in an open ground.  Great satisfaction is derived
while I serve the poorest of the poor, which will
take me very closer to God than adoring God in the most beautiful building.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288534@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Sep 2007 05:50:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sujai</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288533</link>
<description>Deepa:
Once again a well-researched article.  You continue to teach us a lot.  Very interesting!

Thanks for the clarification on &lt;i&gt;nastika&lt;/i&gt;.  The definition helped.  Do you know why the term nastika, over time, became derogatory? 

The very verse of Rig Veda is agnostic too.  It starts with the premise that we can&#039;t know for sure :)

I have a different take on this:

&lt;i&gt;It is interesting to see how the Hindu response to Buddhism - and indeed, to the many divergent schools and traditions that arose within the land  - is not one of conflict but of acceptance and co-existence.&lt;/i&gt;

Indian History is mired with violence.  First Buddhism became a threat to Hinduism, especially the Brahmins who were the faith-keepers, and soon it started to spread quite rapidly, with many kings converting into it.  But a big movement came about, where Buddhism was combated, and then later assimilated into Hinduism.  This transition was not smooth and was quite violent in certain places.  There were riots in the regions of present-day Bihar, which were along the caste lines.

But on the overall, it was definitely not as bloody as what you get to see with friction with Abrahamic religions. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288533@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Sep 2007 05:36:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by raj</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/09/01/000640.php#comment-288529</link>
<description>Deepa, that was well-researched and well-written. Learnt quite a few things. Thanks</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">288529@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Sep 2007 03:40:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>