<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on The Future of Iraq - Will it Fly Apart or Will the Center Hold?</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:42:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by bd</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259975</link>
<description>MAPAD

well, religion will exist so cant do anything about that, lol. but yes, religion as an identifier will be a cause of the civil war. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259975@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:42:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MAPAD</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259882</link>
<description>&quot;That&#039;s when Allah/God and other assorted deities and divinities need to step up to the plate and knock some sense into the warring groups and parties.&quot;


Religion is the cause of the killing my friend.

Iraq is a mess because of religious terrorist fanatics. 

Religious fascists have destroyed Iraq, yet for some strange reason Liberals don&#039;t seem to have a problem with that.

Can anyone explain?



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259882@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:01:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BD</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259859</link>
<description>Chandra #10, lol, i am all for taking risks, but not when we have to deploy our jawans in a horrible situation at the end of a very long supply line. Not worth it. 

On the other hand, here&#039;s an idea, offer economic assistance to NGO&#039;s who can go directly and deal with the tribal and local leaders. Same thing :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259859@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:45:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BD</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259858</link>
<description>BJ #9, that is exactly what my worry is, and for the life of me, i cannot understand why the &quot;troop withdrawal nowists&quot; dont understand this. Its like they are wilfully ignoring the repercussions of the move to either score political points, poke dubya bush in the eye and cut off their own noses or finally are so beset with anti americanism that even a civil war is preferable to the presence of infidel crusader troops. Perhaps all!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259858@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:43:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chandra</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259844</link>
<description>BD

Oil prices are going to be a major problem sooner or later. Why not take a few risks? Why not take a risk? :-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259844@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:35:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BJ Kumar</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259757</link>
<description>Whatever may have been the rationale for invading Iraq - genuine or phony - there is no doubt that the reasons for the Americans to stay put there is very compelling. It is quite amazing that those individuals who claim to care for the Muslim masses - the Mullahs and their like, care nothing about the blood-bath that would in all likelihood follow the American exit which now appears to be only a matter of (short) time.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259757@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:05:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259416</link>
<description>ruvy:

i agree on this part:

&lt;i&gt;I realize that you are quoting the correct sources of the Sunni schools of thought&lt;/i&gt;

rest is conjecture

islam is so well documented that one can find varying opinions (by ulema) to support almost &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; assertion

thank  you ... am well...wandering self desert

ps: one &lt;i&gt;important&lt;/i&gt; difference between  wahabis and salafis is the latter only consider three sources ... the sahabis, the tabaeens, and taba  tabaeens...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259416@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:42:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ruvy in Jerusalem</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259354</link>
<description>Temporal,

I was wondering where you had disappeared to!  

I realize that you are quoting the correct sources of the Sunni schools of thought, but there are some points you don&#039;t have quite straight.  But far be it from me to straighten you out on Islam!!  That would be akin to you telling me how to pray the Amidá in synagogue!   

That is why I recommend you, just as I did bd, to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amislam.com&quot;&gt;website of Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi&lt;/a&gt;, a Sufi legal scholar who &lt;u&gt;does&lt;/u&gt; have all these things straight in his mind.  There you&#039;ll see why the Sunni khalifs kicked out the Wahhabi several times from Islam over the centuries...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259354@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:25:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bd</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259287</link>
<description>t

that no-brainer is what worries me because of what the democrats and other assorted chaps are saying in terms of troop withdrawal. Those coalition troops are the cork in the bottle, as soon as that&#039;s removed, out will come the genie of civil war, and it will indeed be the mother of all civil wars. 

TBS is unfortunately totally tied up looking after baba, he is very unwell and the poor girl is running ragged. So writing currently is paused. 

hope you are keeping well and enjoying your sojourn back home</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259287@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:25:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bd</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259283</link>
<description>Ruvy

I used that term Wahhabi as Sunni as in the commonly used basis of believing in the prophet Mohammad. I will check the reference out but i cant keep up with the doctrinal differences between groups, lol. its tough enough otherwise, but thank you for your kind words. 

cheers

bd</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259283@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:23:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259268</link>
<description>ruvy:

the wahabis are offshoot follwers of the sunni imam ahmed bin hanbal (one of the four early sunni imams - abu hanifa, shafii and malik making up the sunni quartet) and ibn tammiya

some folks mistakenly use the term wahabi interchangeably with salafi

beady:

&lt;i&gt;So the future of Iraq, when/if the coalition forces withdraw, is bleak and will definitely fly apart at the seams in a very short matter of time. &lt;/i&gt;

this is a no-brainer

ps: say hi to sis...miss her...wasn&#039;t she writing on lal musjid?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259268@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:19:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ruvy in Jerusalem</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-259095</link>
<description>bd,

Nicely done article.  One point to pick with you.  The Wahhabi (or Salafi) are not Sunni.  The question stands if they are even Moslems, as they interpret Allah as having a body of some kind.  For further reference on this, go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amislam.com&quot;&gt;the site of Sheikh Professor Abdu Hadi Palazzi&lt;/a&gt;.  I am merely the lowly student. He is the expert.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">259095@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:55:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bd</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-257811</link>
<description>Chandra

Lordy no, mate, never. Our infidel forces in the middle of that pure land? no way. Let them rot in their own religious/political mess and let them stew in it. 

We can purchase oil from the open market or aim for better fuel efficiency, improve public transport....., but lets never become mercenaries like somebody we know and love near us. Just like everybody remembers a certain General Haq is the single person responsible for more palestinian deaths (at par with another General Ariel Sharon), we dont want to be anywhere near that mess, lol. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">257811@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:50:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chandra</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/22/004750.php#comment-257808</link>
<description>BD

Practically speaking, the Kurds already have a country of their own. The issue is-what happens between sunnis and shias, you never know. I still believe it may swing either way. (or may be a 60 year  problem like Palestine)

Have you ever thought about us sending about 100000 odd troops and cutting a deal with the Iraqis/ Americans for low priced oil?

rgds</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">257808@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:31:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>