<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Making Oneself Heard - Stripping Down</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:20:51 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by brawlellaby</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-376135</link>
<description>&lt;a href=http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewthread/62290/&gt;diflucan while nursing&lt;/a&gt;
yeast infections diflucan over the counter drug containing diflucan generic diflucan no prescription diflucan vioxx mexican no persciption diflucan will diflucan treat trichomoniasis medicine diflucan where can i purchase diflucan immunosuppressive diflucan diflucan yeast infections information on diflucan diflucan while nursing diflucan uti dosage nyastatin diflucan candida vaginal yeast infection and diflucan diflucan drug origin of diflucan online diflucan monthly diflucan for fungal infections info diflucan 
&lt;a href=http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewthread/62290/&gt;yeast infections and diflucan and intercourse&lt;/a&gt;
ortho evra diflucan medication diflucan past expiration date yeast infections and diflucan and sex diflucan ingredients buy cheap diflucan online mexico diflucan long term effects diflucan diflucan uti order diflucan online what is diflucan used for male allergy to diflucan dosages of diflucan long term diflucan therapy for candida buy diflucan pal pay taking diflucan diflucan yeast infection free sample will diflucan interact with birth control buy cheap diflucan dosing diflucan dosage nyastatin diflucan candida </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">376135@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:20:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by acerbic</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-250215</link>
<description>[EDITED]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">250215@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:35:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by acerbic</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-250213</link>
<description>C&#039;MON TELL US NOW WHO ARE THE &quot;FUCKERS&quot;???.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">250213@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:33:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by acebic</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-249308</link>
<description>Ms Juneja,I&#039;m trying to understand your anger...can you explain the use of the phrase&quot;fuckers&quot; to describe her in laws.I&#039;m trying to understand why you rushed in to condemn them before all the facts came out in the open.

Indian Express reports

RAJKOT, JULY 11 : The National Commission for Women (NCW) on Wednesday ruled out that Pooja Chauhan, who recently stripped and took to Rajkot&amp;#8217;s streets, alleging &amp;#8220;harassment&amp;#8221; by her husband and in-laws, was harassed for dowry or for failing to bear a male child. 

According to the Commission, &amp;#8220;severe exploitation&amp;#8221; during her childhood had led to her take the step. With the 22-year-old&amp;#8217;s family unwilling to take her back and the community set against her, the NCW team said counselling and rehabilitation of the 22-year-old were now a priority. 

The four-member NCW team&amp;#8212;which came down to Rajkot on Wednesday&amp;#8212;met Pooja, her parents, in-laws, Pratap, community members and police officials. 

Indian Express further  reports..&amp;#8220;Severe exploitation since childhood has led to tremendous mental distress in Pooja&amp;#8217;s case. Pooja had run away from her house as a child due to exploitation, which continued post-marriage. There was discord between Pratap and Pooja over several issues, but she was never harassed for dowry or for not bearing a male child. Her extreme act was the result of a desire to be heard and break free from exploitation,&amp;#8221; said member, National Council for Women, Malini Bhattacharya. 


This is a report by Himanshi Dhawan in the Times of India..

...&quot;Bhattacharya said,&quot;Pooja told us that that she was unhappy at her parents home and ran away from there several times.She fell into bad company and we suspect was trafficked by people...&quot;....and further..&quot;Two cases have been registered by the police for dowry harrasment under 498a of the Indian Penal Code and the Domestic Violence Act.

the report also mentioned that Pooja was not harrased for dowry.

Now Ms Juneja you have the all this on paper
...National commission for women member Malini Bhattacharya has herself confirmed that there was no harrasment for dowry...pooja has booked two case of 489a against her in laws....please tell all of us who really are the &quot;fuckers&quot;??

Can you explain the choice of your language Ms Juneja ....you haven&#039;t answered any of your critics with facts...this simply reeks of cut and run third rate gutter journalism...

C&#039;MON TELL US NOW WHO ARE THE &quot;FUCKERS&quot;???..</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249308@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:12:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sumanth</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-249274</link>
<description>Pooja Chauhan effigy prepared in under garments. Protest at Rajkot at YouTube.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6DjI9W1zOg&amp;mode=related&amp;search=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6DjI9W1zOg&amp;mode=related&amp;search=&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249274@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:25:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Siffer</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-249231</link>
<description>The War against Hypocrite Feminists will intensify now.

In spite of repeated requests, Feminists condemned innocent husband and mother-in-law of Pooja Chauhan who was allegedly indulged in prostitution.

Dirty hypocrite feminists used every trick in their &quot;Goebbelian Propaganda&quot; manual to create hatred against men and especially mothers-in-law across the country.

Even the so called Moderate Feminists joined in.

Now, that all feminists are clearly caught with their own pants down in this issue, the conclusion is that every feminist is a danger to the society.

People must campaign against isolating feminists from all organisations, social work and media. How can such hypocrites and terrorists be given a license to take all country for a ride with their rumours and mischief?

Enough is enough. [EDITED - SNIFFER STUFF]

&lt;a href=&quot;http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=245823&quot;&gt;http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=245823&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249231@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:46:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Siffer</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-249009</link>
<description>Reader,

I do not think that is true. Per my latest discovery, this is a true dowry case.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249009@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:09:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SS</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-248978</link>
<description>Question is, are you authorized to use it.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">248978@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:14:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247971</link>
<description>SS (#24), evidently you cannot read - AP is indicated as the source of the picture on the picture itself.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247971@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:58:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reader</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247957</link>
<description>RAJKOT HARASSMENT CASE


Sex twist to dowry case, NCW probes bare truth

CNN-IBN

TimePublished on Friday , July 13, 2007 at 08:25 in Nation section

TagsTags: Dowry Harassment, Rajkot
E-mail this report | Print this report

New Delhi/Rajkot: On July 6, a young woman in Rajkot protested dowry harassment by walking semi-nude on the city streets.

Twenty-two-year-old Pooja Chauhan hit headlines after she took to the shocking form of protest alleging torture by her in-laws and husband, embarrassing the police into filing a dowry harassment case under the Domestic Violence Act.

But now there&#039;s a fresh twist to the case.

The National Commission for Women says it wasn&#039;t dowry harassment, but sexual exploitation that forced Pooja into walking the streets in her undergarments.

&quot;She was misused by various people. There must&#039;ve been a trafficking chain. These are people exploiting young girls in their vulnerable situation. We have one or two names given to us by Pooja. We&#039;ve given it to the police commissioner,&quot; says NCW member, Malini Bhattacharya.

NCW found Pooja was a victim of child trafficking and despite her love marriage with her husband Pratap, she was again pressured into taking to flesh trade.

&quot;I was sick of my mother-in-law and husband. I am so sick, I don&#039;t care even if I die now,&quot; says Pooja.

Meanwhile, the city police is probing the domestic violence case registered against Pooja&#039;s in-laws.

Rajkot police commissioner Nityanandan told CNN-IBN that though police have no information about trafficking and prostitution angle, they will wait for the NCW report to decide on further course of action.

Law catches up with in-laws

Pooja&#039;s husband Pratap, mother-in-law Hansa and two neighbours were arrested on harassment charges immediately after the news report and are currently out on bail.

They were summoned by a Rajkot court on July 8 and were asked to respond to Pooja&#039;s plea for the demand of alimony and social, mental and physical protection.

Pooja - who went underground after making news - is currently staying with her parents in Rajkot.

The court also ordered police to provide protection to Pooja and also said she should be allowed to continue staying in her rented accommodation.

The court&#039;s order directed her landlord in Shastrinagar, where Pooja stayed for the past year with her two-and-a-half-year-old daughter, not to ask her to vacate the house.

Meanwhile, NCW says its top priority is to rehabilitate Pooja and her daughter.

(With inputs from Rohini Mohan, Deborah Gray and Meghdoot Sharon)

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247957@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:44:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SS</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247953</link>
<description>


Author and Editor,

Can you name the source of the picture on this article.

I do not see anything which say &quot; a courtsey&#039;
or 
it is presumed that, author has taken the picture.

Can someone highlight here about the copyright laws.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247953@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:33:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Against dowry takers</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247827</link>
<description>Kris

You are back, did you do your homework and ready with some data, links etc. I see you are no longer quoting any numbers.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247827@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:29:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kris</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247819</link>
<description>Feminists over the world are not called Feminazis for no reason. Their methodologies, their propaganda, their obfuscation of truth, their justifications in saying their methods only affect a miniscule percentage of people adversely, but benefit larger segment of people - their insistence on summary arrests and the list can go on - all point to the fascistic underpinnings of feminism.

After the death of nazism, it is now the turn of Feminism. Just as we waited for the holocaust before we defeated the nazism, we need some more grief and destruction before we will defeat the feminism.

All evil triumphs with the appeasement by the ordinarily righteous individuals clouded by propaganda. Once the clouds of the feminist propaganda are shattered through, the naked truth will startle everyone into action. That would be the end of Feminist Fraud.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247819@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:26:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Arjun</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247703</link>
<description>&quot;Shame on everyone who stood there to mock her but did nothing to help her. A woman who is sinking will do anything to keep afloat. Today you are responding, the police is responding, we are responding. I think now women need to dare,&quot; said women&#039;s activist Ranjana Kumari.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247703@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:56:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Against Dowry takers</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247673</link>
<description>Kindly point out where is anyone encouraging women to take this route? 
Name a link with valid statments.
How is a victim suppose to look?
What is a victim suppose to do?

Hitler and Aurangzeb achived their saddist goals too, that is now being followed by you guys. Their end came and it was very bad

So also the end of the Talibans and we will not let sif be the next taliban in India
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247673@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:34:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Arjun</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-247607</link>
<description>Sakshi,
Sita and Savitri achieved their ends through courage  and fortitude. Their straits were a lot more dire than that of the unbalanced Pooja Chauhan. Would they have been embedded in our psyche so deeply if they had achieved their ends by sleeping with the enemy and giving in so easily by taking the easy way out?
If the answer is no, then why is everyone encouraging women to take this route? 
Where do you stand ?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">247607@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:18:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sumanth</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-246599</link>
<description>Renuka wants the DIG accused of molestatipn of sister of a female IAS officer in train to be arrested immediately.

Laws have to be same for all (rich, poor, bureaucrats, judges and politicians).

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">246599@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:23:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sumanth</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-246562</link>
<description>[EDITED - IRRELEVANT, PERSONAL]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">246562@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:37:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kris</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-246301</link>
<description>Feminists have insidious agendas that have nothing to do with social welfare or women welfare. I offer this article by Sakshi is a proof of that.

Now, the baseball bat wielding, shiny under garmented Pooja Chouhan&#039;s true story is slowly trickling down in bits and pieces to the masses. Details include her addictions, her prior marriages, the print media journalist involvement in the instigation of her protest. In her husband&#039;s words &amp;ndash; &quot;She would come home late every day. When I tried to stop her from going out with her male friends and from consuming liquor, she threatened suicide and also beat up my mother. Even our neighbors are afraid of her as she is capable of doing anything.&quot; And indeed she proved what she was capable of to the world! After the spotlight turned on her, she now shifted to Kanta Stri Vikas Gruh, a woman&#039;s shelter away from the probing eyes and ears. May be all women who scream harassment and shout for the summary arrests of in-laws using fascistic laws should be moved to women&#039;s shelters first.

NHRC, instead of warning all the concerned government and law enforcement agencies to respect the Human Rights of the accused and not to jump to any conclusions until an investigation is completed, shamelessly sent a show cause notice to Police commissioner for the alleged delay in registering the FIR by the now infamous Pooja Chouhan. This goes to show, despite their euphemestic name, NHRC is also after all, a stooge of the party in power&#039;s gender politics.

Until the fascistic laws like 498a are eliminated from the books of our land, all responsible and decent citizens of this country should work tirelessly to spread the awareness of this evil. Neither of these two adjectives (responsible and decent) apply to the defenders of the indefensible.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">246301@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:32:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sumanth</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-246000</link>
<description>Fake cases have gaps as the case is manufactured with building blocks taken from other people, media etc.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">246000@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:36:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by acerbic</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-245836</link>
<description>how do we tell the genuine cases from the fake?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">245836@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:57:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Siffer</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-245458</link>
<description>Another female does a Pooja Chauhan
-----------------------------------

Soon there will so many unscrupulous semi-naked creatures in the street that all feminist will get discredited.

&lt;b&gt;Now communities will start standing up against unscrupulous women. Now, SIFF has to link up all the communities and swing the votes away from the &quot;fascist political party&quot; which made these laws.&lt;/b&gt;

Thanks to this episode the communities are able to know how dangerous these unscrupulous people are. Feminists are losing their credibility fast.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=245297&quot;&gt;http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=245297&lt;/a&gt;

Community seeks fair probe in complaint against sect leader 
 
Express News Service 
 
Rajkot, July 10: A DAY after a woman filed an FIR alleging indecent demands by Vaishnav community religious leader, the Soni community came to the rescue of the priest calling charges made by the woman and baseless. 

Members of Soni community on Tuesday met the Commissioner of Police requesting him for a fair probe into the incident, where a woman had alleged that she had been estranged by her husband because she did not surrender herself to a prominent religious leader of Vaishnav community. 

 
Riya Lodhia, 24, had filed a police complaint on Monday, saying that she had been meted out undue harassment by her in-laws as she had refused to give herself to Brajesh Maharaj, a priest of Vaishnav community haveli (temple) Madanmohan Prabhu Laxmiwadi. 

Riya has said that the recent Pooja Chauhan episode had given her courage to make the matter public. 

According to Riya, her husband Vimal had estranged from her five years back when she refused to give herself to Maharaj. 

The A-Division police have registered a case against Vimal, his father Jayantibhai, mother Kusumben and Brajesh Maharaj under IPC 506(2), 509 and 114. Jayantibhai is a trustee of the haveli. 

Vaishnav community leaders, including Mathur Babarwala, Daya Delawala and Hasu Khakhar, met Police Commissioner K Nityanandam on Tuesday and sought his help for a fair investigation into the matter.They said that Riya and Vimal are divorced and their guru is innocent. 

Riya, mother of four-year-old girl, has alleged that her husband had abandoned her within four months of their marriage in 2002 and that she had to raise her child all alone. 

&quot;My in-laws asked me to completely surrender myself to Brajesh Maharaj. They would force to me visit the haveli and pay service to him. 

When I refused to do that, they asked me to go to my parents&#039; place and never allowed me to come back again,&#039;&#039; said Riya, who submitted an application to the Commissioner of Police K Nityanandam on Monday. 

She said her in-laws have a chemical factory _Vimal Chemicals _ but she has been living with her uncle as her parents are away in Dubai. Though she wanted justice, she could not muster courage to go public against her in-laws until the Pooja Chauhan incident. 

Brajesh Maharaj, when contacted, dismissed the charges. &quot;All the charges levelled by her are false. I do not understand why she has been doing all this,&#039;&#039; said Brajesh Maharaj.

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">245458@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:56:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Siffer</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-245451</link>
<description>Bitterness of wives leads to abuse of India&#039;s anti-dowry laws

Women&#039;s rights groups in India are concerned that vendettas by some estranged wives could bring India&#039;s vital and hard-won anti-dowry laws into disrepute
By Amrhit Dhillon
THE OBSERVER, NEW DELHI 
Monday, Jul 07, 2003, Page 9 

The entire Sharma family is stuck inside New Delhi&#039;s Tihar Jail -- from the grandparents down to the youngest child, aged three. This is not due to some rampant criminal gene but because a daughter-in-law has filed charges against them alleging harassment to extract dowry payments.

Roop Sharma says their son&#039;s marriage to Nisha went badly wrong. 

&quot;When divorce seemed on the cards, Nisha&#039;s parents began claiming we were torturing Nisha and that we were trying to get a car and gold jewellery out of them. But they just wanted to take their anger out on us and the easiest way was to get us thrown into jail on cooked up dowry charges,&quot; she said.

Such cases have prompted some Indian lawyers to question whether India&#039;s hard-won anti-dowry laws have now played into the hands of embittered wives seeking revenge on their husbands and their husbands&#039; families.

Hostages

After the traditional arranged marriage, Indian brides go to live with the husband&#039;s family. Quite often she is then mistreated and forced to try to extract more dowry -- motorbikes, cars, household goods -- from her parents, even though the husband&#039;s family have probably already received something at the time of the marriage. The wife is a hostage, liable to a thrashing unless her parents produce the goods.

The anti-dowry laws were drafted to help women in this position. If things got really bad, she could report her in-laws to the police.

But a New Delhi high court judge, Sadhana Ramachandran, is seeking a review of the laws. She said they are being abused by wives conducting marital vendettas. They fling false accusations at innocent men and their families, to get even or to inflict pain.

&quot;Such women incriminate everyone, not just the husband but the husband&#039;s sister or brother and parents. In the Sharma&#039;s case, the three-year-old girl ended up in jail too because, with the entire family inside, there was no one to look after her at home,&quot; Ramachandran said.

Ramachandran knows of 85-year-old grandparents in jail, awaiting bail or trial on dowry charges.

&quot;It saddens me to say this, because in my career I have focused on the injustice women suffer in a male-dominated society but some women are misusing these laws out of pure viciousness,&quot; she said.

In one recent case Rajiv Sethi, 26, came back to India from South Africa to marry the bride his mother had chosen. The marriage collapsed and during the painful denouement, his wife Nandita, accused him and her mother-in-law of &quot;mental cruelty&quot; over dowry.

Lack of proof

&quot;I don&#039;t even believe in dowry,&quot; exclaims the mother-in-law, Radhika Sethi. &quot;I accepted the fact that their marriage wasn&#039;t working out but she accused me of starving her, of locking her up and beating her. None of it is true. My son is devastated at having to run around police stations and the courts. He&#039;s lost 27kg. She&#039;s ruined his life with a lie. But how can we prove that we were loving?&quot;

There are fears that abuse of anti-dowry laws could lead to increasing scepticism about the numerous genuine cases of women being mistreated or murdered by husbands and in-laws. That would be a tragedy as some 7,000 women were killed over dowry demands in 2001.

In New Delhi alone, a woman is killed -- usually doused with kerosene and set on fire -- every day.

Radhika Sethi approves of the judge&#039;s call for a review and feels that a proper inquiry should take place before anyone is arrested to separate genuine from fabricated cases. Some lawyers also believe that automatic bail should be given in dowry cases (something that does not happen in all parts of India) so that innocent families can at least be spared the ordeal of jail.

But women&#039;s groups have reacted to the judge&#039;s call with dismay. The All-India Democratic Women&#039;s Federation (AIDWA) has written to the chief justice of India urging him to deny a review.

&quot;It&#039;s taken decades for women to pluck up the courage to use these laws and now they want to dilute them,&quot; said Brinda Karat, AIDWA president. 

&quot;There may well be a few cases of abuse. But dowry-related violence is so horrific that these laws are life-savers for women and it would be disastrous to dilute them. Dowry-hungry men will think they can get away with murder, literally,&quot; Karat said.

Too docile

As it is, she said, Indian women are so culturally conditioned to be docile that very few actually invoke them. AIDWA says only 40,000 cases were registered last year -- &quot;not even a drop in the ocean&quot; -- compared with the violence it says women experience over demands for more dowry.

Lawyer Rani Jethmalani, who specializes in dowry cases, also believes that the number of false cases are miniscule. Marriage is sacrosanct in India, she says, and women will go to any lengths to save theirs.

&quot;I know women who have gone back to their husband and in-laws even after they tried to murder them. Given this attitude, how many will falsely accuse their husband, knowing it means the certain end of the marriage?&quot; Jethmalani said.

If the chief justice agrees to a review, AIDWA, the National Commission for Women and other groups plan nation-wide protests. 

&quot;We fought long and hard for these laws,&quot; Brinda Karat said. &quot;We&#039;re not going to give them up easily.&quot; 
This story has been viewed 6285 times. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">245451@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:44:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vinod</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-245182</link>
<description>I already have a certificate and ie that I have never been arrested.

I have already stated in simple english. 

You love making a fool out of yourself huh? Good. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">245182@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:57:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vinod</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/07/10/042150.php#comment-245057</link>
<description>And also get you english right...it sucks. Why should anyone obtain data from court. Decent people do not have to do the rounds of courts and jails and prisons. Why should anyone go to the court to get your loose statistics confirmed? 

I am no dowry taker or wife beater

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">245057@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:20:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>