REVIEW

Book Review: Next by Michael Crichton

May 07, 2007
Kishore

When you realize that a Chimpanzee differs from the humans by only around 500 genes and is not very different from the genetic composition of a severely autistic child, it is rather scary to realize how close Science has come to understanding the building blocks of life.

Scary, because from what we know of our human race it's a dangerous proposition that man has the ability to manipulate life and human behavior to suit his own fancies. Too much knowledge might be as dangerous as too little.

Beginning with State of Fear and now Next, Michael Crichton questions the generally accepted and revered scientific facts, and attempts to show how what we understand as Science is actually a bunch of misconceptions spun for Political and Economic reasons. After his diatribe against Global Warming in State of Fear, he now takes up Genetics as his next target.

The story runs a number of parallel subplots each dealing with various aspects of Genetic research. A wealthy businessman who poses as a 'capitalist with a conscience' while indulging in heinous biological acts, a research firm which claims ownership of a lady and her child because they patented her father's gene which is naturally inherited by the daughter, a media savvy scientist who steals research that he claims as his own, and a number of movie-style light hearted characters including a Parrot which swears, a Chimp that behaves like a human kid and a talking Orangutan.

The US Government invests a huge amount in biomedical research and Crichton points out that uncontrolled, unethical research might as well result in such bizarre circumstances as a completely legitimate ownership of a living human because his cells are owned by a corporation. Although gene therapy is said to cure diseases, the story tries to show how easy it is to manipulate them to an extent that human behavior can be controlled by an individual. Just like Dolly, the first cloned sheep that died a premature death, many genetically modified humans in the story develop bizarre complications in their system and die under strange circumstances.

Beyond science, Crichton discusses the ethics of humans playing a game of the 'Creator and Controller'. Apparently leading to a world where humans are rendered as guinea pigs with ruthlessly fatal genetic experiments carried out on them without even a legitimate need to inform them beforehand; and the law does not have enough rules to control them.

Despite the near-realistic possibilities portrayed in the novel, it fails as a work of fictional literature. The incidents in the novel stand out as independent events connected by the lone idea of genetic research, but falls way short of having a strong storyline to link them together. Embedded fictional news clippings and research articles with complex biological jargons give you a feel of reading a science magazine rather than a full fledged novel.

The flow is broken. None of the characters stay in your mind after you've turned a page. The characters are too many in number, arbitrary and poorly formed. You'll need to keep noting down the characters and what they are doing in every chapter to keep track of the convoluted story line. With so many characters and parallel incidents connecting them, it is very hard to find where the story - if at all there is one - is heading.

To be fair to all the good information and analysis it contains, the novel would have fared better as a collection of independent documentaries rather than a work of fiction. But the novel does pose an all important question - are we humans messing up with science?

Kishore is a techie based in Bangalore. When he's not writing software, he spends his time writing himself out trying to understand the perfection of reality. Read his musings over life, nature, music and the art of living at Dayswork.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Diganta
URL
May 7, 2007
07:07 AM

Human beings are not messing up with science - Human ethics is slow to catch up with science. While science is talking of manipulating humans, ethics is still in the era of humanity - taking human as a base. Science has proved human beings are nothing but a set of chemical components working togather - where ethics is yet to trace that.

#2
Amrita
URL
May 7, 2007
07:18 AM

Kishore - you know who I hate the most? Poseurs. Crichton is a decent writer with a great imagination that he backs up with good research. The problem is, he's slowly becoming one of those writers who markets his imagination as reality.

Somebody (I just can't remember who) once said that there is no such thing as imagination - we just twist reality and call it imaginative. But it is a twist on reality, not reality itself.

Crichton isnt saying anything new. Science is always disturbing when you sit down and examine it. It's just that one man's disturbing is another man's fascinating and eventually, hopefully, it'll benefit all of us.

Take the example of vaccines. Good thing, right? Saves millions of lives. But those same cultures can be used in bio-terrorism.

Or let's look at a very real example - planes. Good deal: cuts travelling time to a fraction of what it used to be, it's a marvel in more ways than one. But it extracts a tremendous toll on the environment and can be used as a weapon.

There are millions of such examples. What's the alternative?

People bitch and moan about Dan Brown making stuff up. They should pay more attention to this guy.

#3
Kishore
URL
May 7, 2007
08:46 AM

Diganta,
The problem is who draws the line and enforces the ethics? Corporations are on the lookout for profits, but who control them?

Am,
I liked most of Crichton's work. But Next was a disappointment. I guess his age is taking a toll on him, or whatever..

I do agree, that anything can be misused, but that should not curtail the growth of science. Unlike Jurassic Park or even State of Fear, his views in Next seem too disconnected. And so badly written, that I really wonder if it is the same guy who wrote Jurassic Park!

#4
DesiGirl
URL
May 7, 2007
02:10 PM

Is the movie of the same name based on this book?

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/5263)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!