<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Man Kills Fiance Over Dowry</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:24:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by sumit</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/04/30/091024.php#comment-194469</link>
<description>cool...u r smarter than the judge..u have already given ur verdict that the girl was killed for dowry or by her fiance...wow..what a smart chap. People like you shd become judge rather than just blogging here. If you know the truth more than 95% of dowry cases are false. If you dont trust me go ahead for an RTI and get the facts before talking anything rubbish.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">194469@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:24:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hardy</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2007/04/30/091024.php#comment-172747</link>
<description>Too many false cases are allowing handful of people to get away with. But let us not pass a verdict unless we have heard the other side of story.

If you want to restore faith of comman man and judges in genuine dowry harassment, please push for punishing those who file false cases in lacs.

It is another story that if done so, too many wives (and her relatives) would then be behind bars for either promoting dowry transaction in the first place or later for filing a false dowry case.

P.S. I do not think dowry harassment will go away till the time the girl gets her rightful share in her parental household. That will not only make them economically independent and self sufficient, but will also be a fair distribution from the point of view of husband who currently is assumed to be the only one responsible for financial status of family. 

The only offensive part in our dowry system as I see today is that it is given to the groom(or his family) even when the bride is suitable enough to manage her finances and her responsibilities.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">172747@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 May 2007 13:58:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>