OPINION

Is 'What Is Good For India' Good for Kashmir?

October 14, 2006
Sujai

Many Indians believe that 'what is good for India' should be good for Kashmir too. We can't imagine, believe nor accept that Kashmiri Muslims are actually fighting us, including our values - the same values that we cherish and believe to be universal. Indians believe that these Kashmiri do not know what they want. We want to educate them and teach them how benevolent we are, and why it is in their interest to be with us. We want to tell them the greatness of our institutions- democracy, freedom, liberty to women, and our secular principles, and show them our track record (in comparison to those next door). We want to explain to them how being with India is in their best interest- like enjoying good economy and a better standard of living (unlike the other 'backward' neighbors). We cannot imagine how Kashmir wants to become a 'regressive Islamic state' when they have a choice to be with 'progressive democratic and secular nation' such as ourselves? They ask, "Can't Kashmiri see that their youth has better future with us than in an independent Kashmir? Look at what happened to Pakistan and Bangladesh? Can't they see the obvious?"

This was the exact mindset the white man had when he was the colonial master. The white man's burden - his duty to civilize the world, led him to conquer continents, wage wars, and kill millions in the process, all in the name of that single belief, that he was ordained by certain higher power to instill such institutions in uncivilized world. Some leaders in Britain (including Churchill) were opposed to granting independence to India because they believed Indians were better off with British Empire. They could not imagine nor believe Indians would be able to rule themselves.

Churchill, speaking to an audience in London in 1930, claimed that if the British left the Indian sub-continent, then "an army of white janissaries, officered if necessary from Germany, will be hired to secure the armed ascendancy of the Hindu".

Few months later, he said, "to abandon India to the rule of the Brahmins would be an act of cruel and wicked negligence". According to him, "India will fall back quite rapidly through the centuries into the barbarism and privations of the Middle Ages".

Speaking in 1931, Churchill said:
"At present the Government of India is responsible to the British Parliament. To transfer that responsibility to this highly artificial and restricted oligarchy of Indian politicians would be a retrograde act. It would be a shameful act. It would be an act of cowardice, desertion and dishonour. It would bring grave material evils, both upon India and Great Britain."

Indians echo such similar sentiments now when asked about Independence to Kashmir. "How are you going to guarantee the rights of all sects? How are you going to guarantee rights of women? Will this country not go Islamic the Taliban way? How will they survive as a nation?"

The contemporary American imperialism is based on the notion that 'what is good for America is good for the world'. Once a major chunk of population and administration believe in this notion, it becomes easy to manipulate its people to do anything sinister, including waging a war in the name of promoting those American values in foreign lands. No wonder, George Bush II had popular support before invasion of Iraq since it was supposedly 'Operation Enduring Freedom', designed to liberate the oppressed people and install 'American style' democracy there. Now we see the Iraqis fighting these forced values vehemently and vociferously, blowing themselves up in the process. Most Indians grow up believing 'what is good for an Indian' should be good for Kashmiri as well. If need be, we would like to hold that population at gunpoint to instill our values into them. We don't realize that such forceful shoving of values make those populations choke on them; they reject them by vomiting it out.

What most of these Indians fail to understand is that the notion of 'what is good' is different for different people. A Danish jail cell may provide all amenities, including TV, daily food, good clothing and work, but an Indian would rather live in a slum in Delhi to be free. Freedom! That single word that spawned so many struggles of mankind, including our glorious Independence Movement in which we wanted to define it according to our terms, and yet we are now defining it for others, making it paradoxical.

I maintain most of my blogs at sujai blog. E=mc^2.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Sumanth
URL
October 14, 2006
04:11 AM

Indians do not give a damn about what others think about them. Thats includes Kashmiris.

Indians are just interested in getting back their past glory in the world. There was a time Indians influenced Persia, Afganistan, Far East and even China. It happened in the dimensions of culture, religion and economics. In last 2000 years, a lot of Indians settled in Egypt and Arab countries (like Yemen) as well just the way they settled in Far east.

So, Indian interests are exactly similar to interests of many Islamic nations. The goals of both are to become hegemonies without bothering about what happens to others and other cultures.

Might is right. Full stop.

I do not think any of the Islamic countries give a damn about other's sentiments. The same is true for Indians, Chinese and Americans.

Everybody is in same boat.

All statements about who loves whom and who hates who are secondary. All nation states are oppressive whether they are Islamic, Hindu, Christian or Democratics or autocratic.

What is happening in Kashmir is also happening all over India. Kashmiris can crib and other Indians have no choice. Small children and mentally ill are put in jail without trial for decades and no one even bothers about it. There are thousands of such examples all over India. But, similar incidents in Kashmir get into the reports on human rights.

Make Kashmir an independent nation state. It will also become like any other nation state. Its a big Animal Farm. Its easy to dream, be an idealist and be intolerant.

But, the greatest strength is in acceptance without compromise.

Indian will become an even bigger hegemony in near future with its relative increasing economic power compared to its neighbours.

So, its not a very wise idea for anyone to create enemies (who are big and powerful). Its not at all wise idea to also fight battle with many enemies simultaneously (just the way Hitler did).

In must say, Indians and Chinese are two of the most shrewd cultures in this world. These feminine nations may look weak, tolerant, abused and cornered. But, their resilience and preseverence can crush highly focused, logical and disciplined masculine cultures. They can also pit one against the other without getting involved. Often, the opponents may not even understand where the hell the misery is coming from. Both the countries with 2 billion and growing everywhere (in the world) in the dimensions of culture, religion, practices and trade create massive juggernaut even though they may seem like opponents.

#2
bd
October 14, 2006
08:37 AM

Sujai

I found it amusing that you managed to create a monolitic block of indians and another monolithic block of kashmiri's, and then constructed this argument around it. You may want to go a bit granular to see the trees from the wood (if you excuse the pun! ))

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/3305)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!