<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Book Reviews: <i>Eragon</i>, <i>Eldest</i></title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:24:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Fabian Johnson</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/10/02/235222.php#comment-302007</link>
<description>alright, here is the deal. I&#039;m in the middle of writing a fantasy novel that involves dragons also. I went to watch the movie Eragon and I was mildly impressed. From what I hear what their budget was like I think they did a very good job. Anyways, I bought the book eragon and Eldest. Mostly because i wanted to be sure that I hadn&#039;t blatantly copied anything so I wont be sued. I think that both books are good, but they definetly don&#039;t live up to the hype. It&#039;s basically one cliche after the next. If you do like the idea of dragon riders, I highly suggest you purchase an The Dragon Riders of Pern series as well as Eragon. Be on the look out for me in the coming months if you&#039;re hungering for something fresh with an original story line.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">302007@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:24:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kanjisheik</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/10/02/235222.php#comment-41411</link>
<description>Well, I felt that Eragon was just an ordinary book. Understandable, cos Paolini was just a teen. All that hype dint do him any good, in my opinion. On the other hand, Eldest seemed to better and it was like he had found his voice. I am waiting for the third part. Hope it will be worth the wait.

I watched the movie of Eragon and was totally disappointed. It was a dud, IMHO. Waste of money, totally. I guess we should hold Rowling responsible for creating this mania of convertiong fantasy novels into movies! :~)  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41411@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:04:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by nandhu</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/10/02/235222.php#comment-23918</link>
<description>ya the book does borrow heavily from LOTR. but dont all books on fantasy and magic?
i look forward to the movie too. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23918@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:13:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Krithiga</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/10/02/235222.php#comment-23917</link>
<description>Well, I only read Eragon because I fell for the &quot;author is a fifteen year old&quot; part. I thought it&#039;d be refreshingly new and earthy, but it failed. And I couldn&#039;t help but keep thinking, (even while reading) how heavily it borrows from &#039;The Lord of the Rings&#039;. Chose to skip Eldest, hence. But am keen on watching the movie because of &quot;that wonderful actor.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23917@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:09:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>