<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Writer's Block & The Unconscious</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:49:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by erotik</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-359250</link>
<description>Dies ist ein großer Ort. Ich möchte hier noch einmal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">359250@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:49:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MSchannon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13424</link>
<description>temporal, I never guessed you were this clever to write such a complex code nor balaji or aaman for deciphering it so quickly.

me, i&#039;m still lost.

In Jameson Veritas</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13424@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:54:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13406</link>
<description>The Via Agra Code, which reminds me of a cartoon I saw advertising the Da Vinci Code in Jullundur - It read &quot;Vinci Da Code&quot;, a joke perhaps lost in translation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13406@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:39:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by balaji</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13395</link>
<description>i see the message clearly delivered thru da code.

vakya - sentence/ collection of words in sanskrit

vyaghra - tiger - sanskrit again

via agra - destination - through the symbol of love (tajmahal).

it means write a poem &#039;containing&#039; passion symbolizing love! or what ever taj stands for!

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13395@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:31:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13394</link>
<description>writers of the world wiagara!

poets of the world wiagara

© t

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13394@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:14:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MSchannon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13393</link>
<description>Hmmm.   Fortunately, the concept of today&#039;s unconscious is very different from Freud&#039;s--otherwise, the world would be full of very frustrated writers...or very happy sex maniacs.

In Jamesons Veritas</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13393@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:07:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kashyap</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13387</link>
<description>According to Frued all creative endevours are sublimations of sex drives. So whenever you hit a writer&#039;s block stop having sex or take a viagra and then write.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13387@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:34:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MSchannon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13374</link>
<description>So that&#039;s what a McGuffin is!  Thanks!  I use them all the time and never knew.  Owe you one.

and wasn&#039;t Khayyam writing about life rather than writing?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13374@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:03:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13373</link>
<description>Mark:

those were two different comments:)

the khayyam was on writing:

&lt;i&gt;The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it

	-- Omar Khayyam&lt;/i&gt;

the mcguffin was  on your opening gambit:)

Main Entry: McGuffin Part of Speech: noun Definition: in film, a plot device that has no specific meaning or purpose other than to advance the story; any situation that motivates the action of a film either artificially or substantively; also written &lt;I&gt;MacGuffin&lt;/I&gt;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13373@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:43:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MSchannon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13371</link>
<description>Aaman, I think people define writer&#039;s block in very personal ways--but I don&#039;t think you write better or worse because of it.  I used to describe it as &quot;my rhetoric machine&#039;s empty and needs to be refilled.&quot;  For me, it&#039;s usually an annoyance that dosn&#039;t last very long--for others, it can go on for months or even years.

Kush:  the category was &quot;the act of writing.&quot;  I like to think of it as &quot;the commandment to write.&quot;

And temporal--

&lt;b&gt;was it omar khayyam? the moving finger ....

re: the opening gambit...mcguffin;)&lt;/b&gt;

you lost me, sir.  I should know what a mcguffin is, but temporarily brain dead.

In Jameson Veritas
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13371@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:24:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by temporal</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13370</link>
<description>Mark:

i have not experienced a block yet...so cannot relate to your experiences... interesting observations re: conscious and unconscious acts of writing...

was it omar khayyam? &lt;I&gt;the moving finger ....&lt;/I&gt;


re: the opening gambit...mcguffin;)
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13370@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:58:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kush</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13358</link>
<description>&quot;The act of writing&quot; or LAW of writing?...
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13358@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/06/14/034137.php#comment-13352</link>
<description>Is writing better after emerging from a block? Is it necessary to the act of writing?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13352@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 03:45:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>