<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Desicritics Comments on Law and Justice: When Will These Atrocities Against Women End?</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/</link>
<description>Superior South Asian bloggers on Culture, Media, Politics, Sport, Business, and Technology.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:41:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>BC custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by anon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22294</link>
<description>Sanjay...(after all that)..

....and your point was ..??</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22294@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:41:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sap</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22255</link>
<description>There are so many men, women, and childern, victims of an ill thought law 498A, langushing in Indian Jails. This law has been grossly misused. A mere statement of the victim&#039;s ex wife (in vengence, greed, jealously, blackmail) is enough to land the whole family into the hell. Women not alway a victim. You are probably out of the touch with reality. 
Your statements in the article that &quot;We have failed miserably as parents. Either we drive our children to suicide or murder. &quot; speaks for yourself.[EDITED - UNWARRANTED SUPPOSITION AND PERSONAL ATTACK]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22255@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:02:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22232</link>
<description>Likewise-same about you. Get work done and stop making infinite inferences about me again and again

Let me help summarise according to you for the last time and after that get going. :

1)I am a woman 
2) I enjoy alimony
3)I speard hatred
4) I am saddist
5) and all the other bad things

NOw get work done . You have 6 days to produce the defamation letter that you all guys threatened about.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22232@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:52:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hardy</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22214</link>
<description>Reporter... You are a woman sitting on pretty side of law, enjoying a huge alimony or may be a decent salary from those women organizations who employ you for spreading hatred and bias in society.You are witl all public sympathy of being weaker sex and abla naries....But for us
We have to fight against corruption, bias in judicial and political system, make aware the society about nuiances like you and the actual ground facts and have to earn on our own in this tough world not only to support families but to earn enough to pay alimonies to parasites like you...

You must be a sadist of the year to laugh at people who are trying to raise their voice against what is uncomprehensible even under the law of natural justice.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22214@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 05:11:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22207</link>
<description>Save Indian Farters....gosh it stinks. GAS . No guts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22207@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22206</link>
<description>I want to see a a legal paperwork of defamation suit on Mumbai Mirror within 6 days as challenged or we all will think SIF is only GAS. 
BTW any article on mumbai mirrir does not stay for more than 24 hrs. But the author is still there. The journalist&#039;s name was Jigan Vora. Let us see.

You all were also going to ban Provoked -what happened? :(</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22206@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:30:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22205</link>
<description>Instead....give answer to # 88.
6days left. What was that section you threatened and beat your chest on...yes 500. Have the guts. Let us see the power of SIF. 
Or is SIF gas , only talk  and no action? :(</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22205@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:26:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22204</link>
<description>You are giving old stinking news. IF I give old news of cneturies of women rapred, killed this site will be flooded.

Give today&#039;s news if you have the guts.

For each old article you present I will give 20 articles of the same date as yours ...have th guts.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22204@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:25:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22188</link>
<description>Google murder: Anurag was jealous of wife’s success:

LUCKNOW: Divya Saxena alias Deepti Anurag had just started spreading her wings when her journey was cut short by her husband of five years, Anurag Johari. Anurag surfed Google to figure out a ‘safe’ method of killing her and then beat her to death with a baseball bat on November 18, 2005. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22188@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:14:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SAMUDREY</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22134</link>
<description>Here is the SUMMARY.

All buffoons in media and bureacracy/politicians are using statistics of &quot;crime against women&quot;, which is &#039;cases filed at police station&quot; under women harrassment (ipc 498a)

Women harrassment in India, IPC 498a is filed by a ORAL complaint from anyone from girl side. Complaint is NON-BAILABLE (like TADA/POTA/RAPE).
police actually have been looking for IPC 498a women to register cases against husbands, VERY mcuh BOOTY involved. Highest compared to any other cases can beef them money. This CASES/statistics are running largest social business in India, ever had about a decade back.

Now, to continue largest funds INDIA receiving from developed countries for welfare of women since last several decades, lies on showing women atrocities stats to such countries. SO, IPC 498A CONTINUES, SIMPLE COMPLAINT PUTS EVERYONE IN JAIL CONTINUES, NCW CAMPAIGN CONTINUES, MILLION($)- DONATIONS/FUNDS CONTINUES, CORRUPTION CONTINUES. 

Student feminists &amp; patriarchical men or common ppl who normally do not research/investigate into this social science critic in-depth, keep thinking &quot;atrocities on women&quot;. 

Any country with poor economic conditions certainly have atrocities on WEAK person regardless of women or men. so rape/molestation/abduction continues. BUT why they are 10% of all crime cases against women. why harrassment/dowry cases are 90% of criminal atrocities cases against women. Has any one thought about it? particularly the shortminded Indian MEDIA analysts. why atrocities against women is dangerous after only marriage (90%) and why not before marriage? Are elder ppl and husbands that dangerous people compared to molesters/rapists we have in society to attack women before marriage?? 

THIS IS THE GAME OF 498A &quot;ORAL COMPLAINT&quot;/POLICE-JUDICIARY-MUFTA. SAME GOES AS STATISTICS ON WHICH IDIOT POLITICIANS AND NON-SPECIALIST FOOLS ARE SHOUTING TO IMPROVE THE SITUATION OF WOMEN ONLY AFTER MARRIAGE AND JOINING WITH NCW BLINDLY TO FURTHER DESIGN USELESS LAWS/TIME TO THE SOCIETY. 

MITIGATION OF SPECIALISTS MINDS IS WHAT CAUSING INDIA A GREAT DEAL.

IPC 498A IS THE LARGEST BUSINESS WITH WHICH JUDICIARY, POLICE CAN MAKE PRIVATE/PERSONAL MONEY. ALSO THE LARGEST BUSINESS WHERE VENGENCE OF DEFENCE IS LEAST UPON THESE ELEMENTS BY VICTIM COMPARED TO KILLERS/RAPISTS/BURGLARS. 

IPC 498A IS THE LARGEST EXPENDITURE OF TAXPAYERS INTO DUSTBIN.

ONE WHOEVER UNDERSTANDS THIS SOCIAL SCIENCE GAME KNOWS ABOUT WHAT THESE BASTARDS ARE PLAYING FOR THE CATASTOPHRE OF ONCE GREAT INDIA. UNDOUBTEDLY WE ARE HEADING TOWARDS FURTHER CATASTROPHE.

AS LONG AS SEX-STARVED INNOCENT MEN CAN&#039;T APPLY HIS BRAIN, THIS SITUATION CONTINUES.

REGDS
SAMUDREY</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22134@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:04:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bharati</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22127</link>
<description>
When a father is able to stop a child from being killed by petitioning to president 

When a father unfortunately was not allowed to save a girl child from being aborted becuause fathers are given no legal rights to prevent foeticide which happens without their knowledge

When a Father stops a late term abortion inspite of knowing fully well the child will have birth defect and despite huge pressure from in-laws to abort

Dowry laws cases are threatened or filed becuase somewhere fundamental right to abort expected are felt to be violated   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22127@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:14:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by anon</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22120</link>
<description>Where are those questions when some dumb SIF asked and he was told not once but twice not to ask individual case related questions?

Smart you never put that here? Coz you know DC critics make a critical analysis of it.

Also the power of feminists was to walk - out. Calk walk is it.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22120@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:37:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sumanth</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22095</link>
<description>Feminists back out:
-------------------

SIF took on Ground level Feminists in a seminar on Dowry Prohibition officers in Bangalore on Saturday at Judicial Academy.

The sessions were chaired by DIG(Police) and several judges of High Court.

SIF&#039;s flag flew high as the Feminists got snubbed for asking stupid questions.


SIF: Can dowry prohibition officer do a settlement by telling the husband to pay 20 lacs, 30 lacs?

Chair: The dowry prohibition officers must not do settlements. That is not their duty. They must not lower their dignity.


Feminist asks: Why men are allowed by courts to apply for divorce?

Chair: Madam, this is the fundamenal human rights of every citizen. We do not give someone divorce just on baseless ground. Evidences are necessay to get divorce and it takes time. Women are also allowed to apply for divorce.

Another Feminist asks: Men are getting anticipatory bail when a dowry case is filed? Why?

Chair: The anticipatory bails are given by a senior judge after evaluating all the arguments and evidences. That is the law.

Feminist: Dowry Prohibition officer must consult Women&#039;s Organisations.

SIF(Bharati):(Immediately) I urge the Dowry Prohibition officers to be Gender Neutral and they must consult both women&#039;s and Men&#039;s organisations.

Chair: Suggestion is accepted.

SIF: If a case is proven to be false, can section 211 of IPC be applied automatically to punish the people filing false cases?

Chair: If there are enough evidences of false cases, Section 211 against the false complainants will be allowed.

Bottomline:
===========
Men&#039;s organisations are no longer politically incorrect in Bangalore. Feminists will not have cake walks from now onwards.
-----------
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22095@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:37:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Another Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22090</link>
<description>Even whne supreme court of india had given the hang to death to three women, some reporter prefers to hide that.

Some women can go any extend to hide thier own crime and some reporters can go any extand to save thier skin.


 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22090@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:54:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22085</link>
<description>May I intervene and say soemthing.

I dont know if these woman burning their children is a true story but if it is then its horrible. Even God will not forgive them. No. 
Having said that the life of a human being should be more impt than going by genders.

But there are also many ruthless fathers who abandon their babies because they have birth defects. These fathers will burn in HELL. Their own child in one form or the other will get back at them. Even hell will be ashamed to have such ruthless coward greedy fathers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22085@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:43:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bharati</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22081</link>
<description>And so many women are being allowed to get scott free after drving their husbands sucide.
Look in the IPCs women have an exemption from being tried in many classes of case. 

Preeti still please explain why you want to disagree with WHO sucide statistics ( use rate not absolute figures )  which conclusively proves that 23000 women are driving their husbands to sucide . ( after all the only difference between a married man and unmarried man is a wife ) . Your link does not explain .It only tries to claim that 40% of men facing 498a commit sucide as claim by SIf .SIF doe not claim that .All SIF syass that 498a is one of the ways byt which wifes drive these 23000 men to sucide 

Many of the so called bride burnings are psycopathic women who burn their children first and then burn their children .How can we ever expect to have sympathy for women who burn their children.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22081@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:17:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22077</link>
<description>The above cases are the ones where the criminals are already convicted. They all got a fair trial. 

Over the months I have read...give statistics etc, so here are some real cases. 

No doubt that some mulish humanbeings  who are spoilt sports will say that the judgement was biased etc. Let them.

Not only in our country but in our neighbouring country women have no rights at all. I pity them. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22077@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:45:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22076</link>
<description>Father gets 12 years&#039; RI for raping daughter

A local court at Banai has sentenced a man to 12 years rigorous imprisonment for raping his own daughter. 
Rajendra Panigrahi, sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate at Banai, convicted the man for committing the crime in village Saradhapur.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22076@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:40:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter-from pakistan</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22075</link>
<description>Pak girl raped for &#039;acquiring education&#039; 


ISLAMABAD: After Mukhtaran Mai, a case of Mumtaz 

Mai has come to light in rural Pakistan, where women become victims of tribal warfare, family feuds or quite simply, male violence. 

The News International on Saturday reported the case of one Mumtaz Mai and her daughter, Ghazala Shaheen Bathi, who were abducted, held in captivity and gang-raped for 12 days because daughter Ghazala dared to become educated. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22075@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:37:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Reporter</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22074</link>
<description>HC convicts freed man for burning wife:

NEW DELHI: Overturning a 25-year-old judgment, the high court has convicted a man for burning his wife to death in 1983. 

From a careful analysis of the material on record, we found that the trial court erred in rejecting the victim&#039;s statements made to the doctor, the investigating officer and the SDM, prior to her death,&quot;observed the judges. 

Justice is finally served</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22074@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:28:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sreedhar</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22051</link>
<description>[edited - no personal attacks please]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22051@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:33:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Victim Husband</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22019</link>
<description>Indian Men should stop Marrying Indian Women! They need to stop doing anything for their Country who sponsers and becomes an accomplise in the Crime and Injustice done to Men! Indian Men should change their Nationality, cause their country cannot provide them justice.

Men Go Marry Foreign Ladies if you love your life and the rest of your Family.

Men change your Nationality!! If India cannot provide you Justice then why be its Citizen?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22019@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:49:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by null</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22017</link>
<description>Looks like Indian husband is wnning the game...he will keep posting the trash and finally the sc editors are tired of deleting his trash.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22017@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:34:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by null</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-22005</link>
<description>**** stands for love. No kidding...I meant it</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22005@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:46:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Preeti</title>
<link>http://desicritics.org/2006/03/12/134422.php#comment-21829</link>
<description>Are you reading? read carefuly. read between the lines. :)


See ...when links are produced of newspapers, they are called media frogs

When posts of DC authors are produced they are called Nimhans

I cant find genuine data from SIF sites now ...  ;(

Therefore prior to all this I said in # 44. Stats can be rigged to reach a desired conclusion and proven too. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21829@desicritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:47:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>